12.07.2015 Views

Literatur zur Tugendethik Bibliography on Virtue ... - Academic Room

Literatur zur Tugendethik Bibliography on Virtue ... - Academic Room

Literatur zur Tugendethik Bibliography on Virtue ... - Academic Room

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1997 [151] Garcia, J. L. A. (1997): Interpers<strong>on</strong>al <strong>Virtue</strong>s. Whose Interests Do They Serve?, Proceedings ofthe American Catholic Philosophical Associati<strong>on</strong> 71, S. 31–60.2005 [152] Gardiner, Stephen M. (2005): Seneca’s Virtuous Moral Rules, in <strong>Virtue</strong> Ethics, Old and New,hrsg. v<strong>on</strong> Stephen M. Gardiner, Ithaca, S. 30–59.2005 [153] Gardiner, Stephen M. (Hrsg.) (2005): <strong>Virtue</strong> Ethics, Old and New, Ithaca.2000 [154] Garrard, Eve (2000): Slote <strong>on</strong> <strong>Virtue</strong>, Analysis 60, S. 280–84.1997 [155] Gauthier, Jeffrey A. (1997): Schiller’s Critique of Kant’s Moral Psychology: Rec<strong>on</strong>cilingPractical Reas<strong>on</strong> and an Ethics of <strong>Virtue</strong>, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27, S. 513–544.1977 [156] Geach, Peter (1977): The <strong>Virtue</strong>s, Cambridge.1998 [157] Gert, Bernard (1998): Morality. Its Nature and Justificati<strong>on</strong>, New York, S. 277–309 (“<strong>Virtue</strong>sand Vices”).1985 [158] Gewirth, Alan (1985): Rights and <strong>Virtue</strong>s, Review of Metaphysics 38, S. 739–62.2005 [159] Gill, Christopher (Hrsg.) (2005): <strong>Virtue</strong>, Norms, and Objectivity. Issues in Ancient and ModernEthics, Oxford.2008 [160] Goldie, Peter (2008): <strong>Virtue</strong>s of Art and Human Well-Being, Proceedings of the AristotelianSociety Supplementary Volume 82, S. 179–95. 422008 [161] Gowans, Christopher W. (2008): <strong>Virtue</strong> and Nature, Social Philosophy and Policy 25, S. 28–55.2011 [162] Gowans, Christopher W. (2011): <strong>Virtue</strong> Ethics and Moral Relativism, in A Compani<strong>on</strong> to Relativism,hrsg. v<strong>on</strong> Steven D. Hales, Oxford, S. 391–410.1999 [163] Graeser, Andreas (1999): Philosophie und Ethik, Düsseldorf, S. 144–49.2004 [164] Graham, Gord<strong>on</strong> (2004): Eight Theories of Ethics, L<strong>on</strong>d<strong>on</strong>, S. 53–70 (“Naturalism and <strong>Virtue</strong>Theory”).1994 [165] Greenspan, Patricia S. (1994): Guilt and <strong>Virtue</strong>, Journal of Philosophy 91, S. 57–70. 434243“What is the point of art, and why does it matter to us human beings? The answer that I will give in thispaper, following <strong>on</strong> from an earlier paper <strong>on</strong> the same subject, is that art matters because our being activelyengaged with art, either in its producti<strong>on</strong> or in its appreciati<strong>on</strong>, is part of what it is to live well. The focus inthe paper will be <strong>on</strong> the dispositi<strong>on</strong>s—the virtues of art producti<strong>on</strong> and of art appreciati<strong>on</strong>—that arenecessary for this kind of active engagement with art. To begin with, I will argue that these dispositi<strong>on</strong>sreally are virtues and not mere skills. Then I will show how the virtues of art, and their exercise in artisticactivity, interweave with the other kinds of virtue which are exercised in ethical and c<strong>on</strong>templative activity.And finally, I will argue that artistic activity affords, in a special way, a certain kind of emoti<strong>on</strong>al sharingthat binds us together with other human beings.”“Feelings of guilt have a role to play in moral philosophy as a link between the ethics of virtue and duty.They allow for a noti<strong>on</strong> of imperfect virtue as something still achievable despite serious moral lapses in thepast. They also would seem to be required by perfect virtue in resp<strong>on</strong>se to a moral dilemma. The defense ofguilt in a case of dilemma has implicati<strong>on</strong>s for virtue ethics insofar as it yields a distincti<strong>on</strong> between anagent’s character and his record of moral acti<strong>on</strong>--and an asymmetrical justificatory treatment of guilt versusother-directed variants of emoti<strong>on</strong>al blame.”18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!