12.07.2015 Views

Deliverable D 1.3 RESULTS OF META-ANALYSIS ... - cast-eu.org

Deliverable D 1.3 RESULTS OF META-ANALYSIS ... - cast-eu.org

Deliverable D 1.3 RESULTS OF META-ANALYSIS ... - cast-eu.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Campaigns and awareness raising strategies in traffic safety — <strong>Deliverable</strong> D-1.1campaigns of the future. Most of the effects given in this report weregenerated using a random effects model after accounting for publication bias.Table 7.19 Four possible estimates of the overall campaign effect on accidents. Each overalleffect is based on n individual effects (excluding any artificial effects generated by trim-andfill).OutcomemeasureModelAccount forpublicationbias?effect(%)95%confidenceintervalSignificant?(p < 0.05)fixed effects no - 10 (- 11 -10) yesaccidents(n = 118)random effects- 13 (-16; -9) yesfixed effect yes, generate -7 (- 8, -6) Yes26 effects torandom effects compensate -6 (-10;-1) yes7.3.1 SUMMARYAn example of the use of meta-analysis to generate en estimate of the overalleffects of campaigns on road accidents is given. An effect is a change inaccident counts (or percentage behaviour) occurring before and during / aftera campaign. Each effect is expressed as an odds ratio from which the naturallogarithm (ln) is taken. The ln odds ratio is then weighted according to thenumber of people or counts observed in the study. Individual weighted ln oddsratios are then summed and the sum divided by the sum of individual weightsto give an overall effect. The population of effects is checked for publicationbias and homogeneity in order to ensure that the overall effect is notoverestimated.70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!