12.07.2015 Views

Bariatric treatments for adult obesity - Institute of Health Economics

Bariatric treatments for adult obesity - Institute of Health Economics

Bariatric treatments for adult obesity - Institute of Health Economics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Partially reported: The study types, as designated by a level <strong>of</strong> evidence hierarchy category, arementioned in the concluding section (includes discussion) or statement <strong>of</strong> the review, but notthe quality <strong>of</strong> the studies.Not reported: The methodological quality <strong>of</strong> the included studies is not mentioned in theconcluding section (includes discussion) or statement <strong>of</strong> the review.Quality subsection 6: Conclusions supported by resultsYes: The conclusions drawn by the authors <strong>of</strong> the review we re supported by theevidence presented in the results section.Unclear: Some, but not all, <strong>of</strong> the conclusions drawn by the authors <strong>of</strong> the reviewwere supported by the evidence presented in the results section.No: The conclusions drawn by the authors <strong>of</strong> the review were not supported bythe evidence presented in the results section.Conflict <strong>of</strong> interest and fundingConflict <strong>of</strong> interestReported: A statement <strong>of</strong> conflict <strong>of</strong> interest (if any) is provided.Partially reported: A conflict <strong>of</strong> interest is mentioned but details are not provided.Not reported: A statement <strong>of</strong> conflict <strong>of</strong> interest (if any) is not provided.Sources <strong>of</strong> fundingReported:Funding sources are mentioned. The review was developed without external funding (<strong>for</strong> example, authors employed by auniversity or volunteered time to produce a Cochrane Review).Partially reported: External funding is mentioned but details are not provided.Not reported: Funding sources are not mentioned.Optional Quality Rating SystemThe quality <strong>of</strong> systematic reviews can be assessed according to how well their methods exclude biasand confounding by examining the search strategy used, how the data extraction, quality assessment<strong>of</strong> the included studies, and data analysis/synthesis were conducted, and whether the conclusions <strong>of</strong>the review match the results. Thus, the quality <strong>of</strong> the review can be rated numerically with respect tothe six quality subsections (grey boxes above), as follows.Good—six criteria met, or five criteria met and one criterion ‘unclear.’Average—one criterion not met, or one criterion not met and one criterion ‘unclear,’ or twocriteria ‘unclear.’Poor—at least two criteria not met.<strong>Bariatric</strong> <strong>treatments</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>adult</strong> <strong>obesity</strong> 118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!