12.07.2015 Views

Bariatric treatments for adult obesity - Institute of Health Economics

Bariatric treatments for adult obesity - Institute of Health Economics

Bariatric treatments for adult obesity - Institute of Health Economics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table T.F.3-6: Conclusions from the systematic reviews/HTAsSRs/HTAsConclusionDietary therapy/physical exerciseGalani & Schneider, 2007 56Shaw et al., 2006 57Curioni & Lourenco,2005 58Behavioural therapyShaw et al., 2005 15PharmacotherapyJohansson et al., 2009 59Padwal et al., 2004 20Li et al., 2005 60SurgeryKlarenbach et al., 2010 38Colquitt et al., 2009 62Multiple strategiesTsai, 2009 64Life style interventions were efficacious in the mid- to long-term prevention and treatment <strong>of</strong> <strong>obesity</strong> leading to a significant reduction in body weightand cardiovascular risk factors.Exercise is an effective weight loss intervention, particularly when combined with dietary interventions. Exercise is also an effective intervention <strong>for</strong>improving a range <strong>of</strong> secondary outcomes even when weight loss does not occur. No long-term morbidity and mortality benefits were associated withexercise. Exercise was shown to positively impact the intermediate outcomes commonly associated with cardiovascular disease.Adding exercise to diet produced greater weight loss than diet alone in overweight and obese individuals immediate after the intervention period andafter one-year follow-up, but did not produce better long-term maintenance <strong>of</strong> the lost weight.People who are overweight or obese benefit from psychological intervention, particularly behavioural and cognitive-behavioural strategies, to enhanceweight reduction. Psychological interventions are extremely useful when combined with dietary and exercise strategies. Other psychological interventionsare less rigorously useful <strong>for</strong> their efficacy as weight loss <strong>treatments</strong>.Available weight loss drugs differ markedly regarding risk <strong>of</strong> discontinuation due to adverse events, as well as differing in the underlying causes <strong>of</strong> theseevents. Given the large number <strong>of</strong> patients eligible <strong>for</strong> treatment, the low number needed <strong>for</strong> harm <strong>for</strong> rimonabant is a concern.Internal validity <strong>of</strong> studies was limited by high attrition rates. Orlistat, sibutramine, and rimonabant in trials <strong>of</strong> one year or longer are modestly effectivein reducing weight, and have differing effects on cardiovascular risk and adverse effects pr<strong>of</strong>iles.Sibutramine, orlistat, phentermine, diethylpropion (probably), bupropion, fluoxetine, and topiramate all promote weight loss when given along withrecommendations <strong>for</strong> diet. Sibutramine and orlistat are the two most-studied drugs. The amount <strong>of</strong> extra weight loss attributable to these medications ismodest (less than 5 kg at one year), but this amount still may be clinically significant.Although data from large, adequately powered, long-term RCTs are lacking, bariatric surgery seems to be more effective than standard care <strong>for</strong> thetreatment <strong>of</strong> severe <strong>obesity</strong> in <strong>adult</strong>s.Procedures that are mainly diversionary (e.g., BPD) result in the greatest amounts <strong>of</strong> weight loss, hybrid procedures (e.g., RYGB) are <strong>of</strong> intermediateeffectiveness, and restrictive procedures (e.g., AGB) result in the least amounts <strong>of</strong> weight loss. RYGB and AGB tended to lead to trade-<strong>of</strong>fs between therisk <strong>of</strong> adverse events and the need <strong>for</strong> procedure conversion or reversals. The evidence base was limited <strong>for</strong> sleeve gastrectomy.Surgery is more effective than conventional management. Certain procedures produce greater weight loss, but data are limited. The evidence on safety iseven less clear. Due to limited evidence and the poor quality <strong>of</strong> the trials, caution is required when interpreting comparative safety and effectiveness.Current evidence does not support the use <strong>of</strong> low-intensity to moderate-intensity physician counseling <strong>for</strong> <strong>obesity</strong>, by itself, to achieve clinicallymeaningful weight loss. Available data do not indicate how best to incorporate PCPs into more intensive approaches <strong>for</strong> achieving this goal. PCPcounseling, plus pharmacotherapy, or intensive counseling (from a dietitian or nurse), plus meal replacements may help patients achieve this goal.<strong>Bariatric</strong> <strong>treatments</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>adult</strong> <strong>obesity</strong> 149

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!