12.07.2015 Views

Book 2.indb - US Climate Change Science Program

Book 2.indb - US Climate Change Science Program

Book 2.indb - US Climate Change Science Program

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Abrupt <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>Change</strong>Water table depth determines both the fractionof the wetland soil or peat that is anaerobicand the distance from this zone of methaneproduction to the atmosphere (i.e., the lengthof the oxidation zone) and is often the singlemost important factor controlling emissions(Bubier et al., 1995; Waddington et al., 1996;MacDonald et al., 1998). The strong sensitivityof CH 4 emissions to water table positionsuggests that changing hydrology of northernwetlands under climate change could drive largeshifts in associated methane emissions.Vegetation type controls plant litter tissuequality/decomposability, methanogen substrateinput by root exudation (e.g., Kingand Reeburgh, 2002), and the potential forplant-mediated transport of methane to theatmosphere (e.g., King et al., 1998; Joabsson andChristensen, 2001). Substrate type and quality,generally related to quantity of root exudationand to vegetation litter quality and degree ofdecomposition, can directly affect potentialmethane production. Vegetation productivitycontrols the amount of organic matter availablefor decomposition.In wetland ecosystems, when the water tableis near the surface and substantial methaneemissions occur, the remaining controlling factorsrise in relevance. Christensen et al. (2003)find that temperature and microbial substrateavailability together explain almost 100% ofthe variations in mean annual CH 4 emissionsacross a range of sites across Greenland,Iceland, Scandinavia, and Siberia. Bubier et al.(1995) find a similarly strong dependence onsoil temperature at a northern peatland complexin Canada. The observed strong relationshipbetween CH 4 emissions and soil temperaturereflects the exponential increase in microbialactivity as soil temperatures warm. The strongwarming expected across the northern highlatitudes is likely to be a positive feedback onmethane emissions.The presence or absence of permafrost canalso have a direct influence on CH 4 emissions.Across the northern high latitudes, permafrostfeatures such as ice wedges, ice lenses,thermokarst, and ice heaving determine thesurface microtopography. Small variations insurface topography have a strong bearing onplant community structure and evolution as wellas soil hydrologic and nutritional conditions(Jorgenson et al., 2001, 2006), all of whichare controlling factors for methane emission.Projections of future methane emission arehampered by the difficulty of modeling landscapeand watershed hydrology well enoughat large scales to realistically represent smallchanges in wetland water table depth.Mean CH 4 flux (mg/m 2 /d) Mean CH 4 flux (mg/m 2 /d)10001001014 6 8 10 12 14 16Mean temp at water table (C)Methane vs. water table100010010Methane vs. temperature1-100 0 100 200 300 400 500Height above mean water table (mm)Figure 5.13. Relationships between water table height,temperature, and methane emissions for northern wetlandsfrom Bubier et al. (1995). Abbreviations: mg/m 2 /d, milligrams persquare meter per day; mm, millimeters; C, degrees Celsius.195

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!