Book 2.indb - US Climate Change Science Program

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The U.S. Climate Change Science ProgramChapter 3TYPICAL JANUARY−MARCH WEATHER ANOMALIESAND ATMOSPHERIC CIRCULATION DURINGMODERATE TO STRONG EL NIÑO AND LA NIÑAClimate Prediction Center/NCEP/NWSFigure 3.2. Schematic maps showing the influence of El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) variability on regionalclimate over North America. Warm episodes (El Niños) result in cooler-wetter conditions from the Southwest tothe Southeast during the winter season. Warm-dry conditions prevail over the same region during cold episodes(La Niñas), also during winter. From http://www.cpc.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/ensocycle/nawinter.shtml.74
Abrupt Climate Changeorbital-time-scale variations were interannualto millennial time-scale variations, many abruptin nature (Mayewski et al., 2004; Viau et al.,2006), arising from variations in solar output,volcanic aerosols, and internally generatedcovariations among the different componentsof the climate system. On longer, or “orbital”time scales, the ice sheets, biogeochemicallydetermined greenhouse gas concentrations, anddust and aerosol loading should be regardedas internal components of the climate system,but over the past 11,000 years, they changedslowly enough relative to other components ofthe climate system, such as the atmosphere andsurface ocean, that they are most appropriatelyconsidered as external controls of regional-scaleclimate variations (Saltzman, 2002).2.1.1 Coupled Ocean-AtmosphereForcing of North AmericanHydrological VariabilityThe standard approach that uses models todemonstrate a link between SSTs and observedclimate variability involves forcing an AtmosphericGeneral Circulation Model (AGCM)with observed SSTs as a lower boundarycondition (see Hoerling et al., 2008 (CCSPSAP 1.3, Box 3.2) for further discussion of thisapproach). Ensembles of simulations are usedwith different initial conditions such that theinternally generated atmospheric weather inthe ensemble members is uncorrelated from onemember to the next and, after averaging overthe ensemble, the part of the model simulationcommon to all—the part that is SST forced—is isolated. The relative importance of SSTanomalies in different ocean basins can beassessed by specifying observed SSTs only insome areas and using climatological SSTs (orSSTs computed with a mixed layer (ML) ocean)elsewhere.Schubert et al. (2004a,b) performed a climatemodel simulation from 1930 to 2004, whichsuggested that both a cold eastern equatorialPacific and a warm subtropical Atlantic werethe underlying forcing for drought over NorthAmerica in the 1930s. Seager et al. (2005b) andHerweijer et al. (2006) performed ensemblesthat covered the entire period of SST observationssince 1856. These studies conclude thatcold eastern equatorial Pacific SST anomaliesin each of the three 19th century droughts, theDust Bowl, and the 1950s drought were theprime forcing factors. Seager (2007) has madethe same case for the 1998–2002 period ofthe current drought, suggesting a supportingrole for warm subtropical Atlantic in forcingdrought in the West. During the 1930sand 1950s droughts, the Atlantic was warm,whereas, the 19th century droughts seem to bemore solely Pacific driven. Results for the DustBowl drought are shown in Figure 3.3, and timeseries of modeled and observed precipitationover the Great Plains are shown in Figure 3.4.Hoerling and Kumar (2003) instead emphasizethe combination of a La Niña-like state and awarm Indo-west Pacific Ocean in forcing the1998–2002 period of the most recent drought.On longer time scales, Huang et al. (2005) haveshown that models forced by tropical PacificSSTs alone can reproduce the North Americanwet spell between the 1976–77 and 1997–98 ElNiños. The Dust Bowl drought was unusual inthat it did not impact the Southwest. Rather, itcaused reduced precipitation and high temperaturesin the northern Rocky Mountain Statesand the western Canadian prairies, a spatialpattern that models generally fail to simulate(Seager et al., 2007b).The SST anomalies prescribed in the climatemodels that result in reductions in precipitationare small, no more than a fraction of adegree Celsius. These changes are an orderof magnitude smaller than the SST anomaliesassociated with interannual El Niño/SouthernOscillation (ENSO) events or Holocene SSTvariations related to insolation (incoming solarradiation) variations (~0.50 °C; Liu et al., 2003,2004). It is the persistence of the SST anomaliesand associated moisture deficits that createserious drought conditions. In the Pacific, theSST anomalies presumably arise naturally fromENSO-like dynamics on time scales of a year toa decade (Newman et al., 2003). The warm SSTanomalies in the Atlantic that occurred in the1930s and 1950s (and in between), and usuallyreferred to as part of an Atlantic MultidecadalOscillation (AMO; Kushnir, 1994; Enfield etal., 2001), are of unknown origin. Kushnir(1994), Sutton and Hodson (2005), and Knightet al. (2005) have linked them to changes inthe Meridional Overturning Circulation (seeChapter 4), which implies that a strongeroverturning and a warmer North Atlantic Ocean75
Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTSAuthor Team for th
Page 8 and 9:
The U.S. Climate Change Science Pro
Page 10 and 11:
PREFACEReport Motivation and Guidan
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 21 and 22:
1CHAPTERAbrupt Climate ChangeIntrod
Page 23 and 24:
Abrupt Climate Change-35Arctic temp
Page 25 and 26:
Abrupt Climate ChangeFigure 1.2. Po
Page 27 and 28:
Abrupt Climate Changewell below sea
Page 29 and 30:
Abrupt Climate Changeheterogeneous
Page 31 and 32:
Abrupt Climate Changeapart from dro
Page 33 and 34:
Abrupt Climate Change6. Abrupt Chan
Page 35 and 36: Abrupt Climate Changeintermediate c
Page 37 and 38: Abrupt Climate Changeper square met
Page 39: Abrupt Climate Changeis the norther
Page 42 and 43: The U.S. Climate Change Science Pro
Page 44: The U.S. Climate Change Science Pro
Page 47 and 48: Abrupt Climate ChangeRegardless how
Page 49 and 50: Abrupt Climate Changecentrations, a
Page 51 and 52: Abrupt Climate ChangeBox 2.1. Glaci
Page 53 and 54: Abrupt Climate Changetime. Degree-d
Page 55 and 56: Abrupt Climate Changetion, and accu
Page 57 and 58: Abrupt Climate ChangeBox 2.2. Mass
Page 59 and 60: Abrupt Climate Changeof the glacier
Page 61 and 62: Abrupt Climate ChangeFigure 2.6. Ra
Page 63 and 64: Abrupt Climate Changewater) or, mor
Page 65 and 66: Abrupt Climate ChangeFigure 2.7. Re
Page 67 and 68: Abrupt Climate Changeresults in a l
Page 69 and 70: Abrupt Climate Changeis not providi
Page 71 and 72: Abrupt Climate Changemeasurements c
Page 73 and 74: Abrupt Climate Changemore than 10,0
Page 75 and 76: Abrupt Climate Changeocean models h
Page 77 and 78: Abrupt Climate Changeto atmosphere-
Page 79 and 80: 3CHAPTERHydrological Variability an
Page 81 and 82: Abrupt Climate Change• The integr
Page 83 and 84: Abrupt Climate Changethe soil (King
Page 85: Abrupt Climate Changeon (Kaplan et
Page 89 and 90: Abrupt Climate ChangeFigure 3.4. (t
Page 91 and 92: Abrupt Climate Changemodels forced
Page 93 and 94: Abrupt Climate ChangeBox 3.2. Waves
Page 95 and 96: Abrupt Climate Changebecause (1) th
Page 97 and 98: Abrupt Climate ChangeHarrison et al
Page 99 and 100: Abrupt Climate Changethat even the
Page 101 and 102: Abrupt Climate Changethat seen afte
Page 103 and 104: Abrupt Climate Changeentire period
Page 105 and 106: Abrupt Climate Changelong-lived gre
Page 107 and 108: Abrupt Climate Changeplanetary-scal
Page 109 and 110: Abrupt Climate ChangeBox 3.3. Paleo
Page 111 and 112: Abrupt Climate Changerelated to the
Page 113 and 114: Abrupt Climate Changeinto the North
Page 115 and 116: Abrupt Climate ChangeThe summertime
Page 117 and 118: Abrupt Climate Change(Anderson et a
Page 119 and 120: Abrupt Climate ChangeHere the model
Page 121 and 122: Abrupt Climate Changetropical tropo
Page 123 and 124: Abrupt Climate Changefunctions; Koc
Page 125 and 126: Abrupt Climate Changechanges than t
Page 127: Abrupt Climate Changeboundary condi
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
202REFERENCESChapter 1 ReferencesAl
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258:
U.S. Climate Change Science Program
show all

Book 2.indb - US Climate Change Science Program

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?