12.07.2015 Views

Book 2.indb - US Climate Change Science Program

Book 2.indb - US Climate Change Science Program

Book 2.indb - US Climate Change Science Program

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Abrupt <strong>Climate</strong> <strong>Change</strong>Snowcover5, 6, 7–12, 13–10, 11+–16+1, 2, 3, 4+ 8, 9 +14, 15<strong>Climate</strong>warming+ +CO 2, SHPhysiologyenzymes, stomatesBAStructurecomposition,vegetation shiftsPermafrostwarming, meltingEDisturbancefire, insectsLand uselogging, drainage,reindeer herdingCDPhysicalfeedbacksMediatingprocessesBiotic controlPhysiological feedbacks:Physical feedbacks:(1) Higher decomposition: CO 2(2) Reduced transpiration: SH(3) Drought stress: CO 2(4) PF melting: CH 4(5) Longer production period: CO 2(6) NPP response to N min: CO Mechanisms:2(7) NPP response to T: CO 2Structural feedbacks:(8) Shrub expansion: A(9) Treeline advance: A , CO 2(10) Forest degradation: A but CO 2, SH(11) Light to dark taiga: A but CO 2, SH(12) More deciduous forest: A , SH(13) Fire/treeline retreat: A(14) Reduced heat sink: SH(15) Watershed drainage: SH(16) Earlier snowmelt: AA: albedoSH: sensible heat fluxCO 2, CH 4: atmospheric concentrationFigure 5.15. Terrestrial responses towarming in the Arctic that influence theclimate system. Responses of permafroston the left are coupled with functional(physiological) and structural bioticresponses on the right either directly(arrows B and D) or through mediatingprocesses of disturbance and land use (arrowsC and E). Functional and structuralbiotic responses are also coupled (arrowA). Physical responses will generally resultin positive feedbacks. In general, functionalresponses of terrestrial ecosystems actas either positive or negative feedbacks tothe climate system. In contrast, most ofthe structural responses to warming areambiguous because they result in bothpositive and negative feedbacks to theclimate system. Abbreviation: NPP, netprimary production. Figure adapted fromMcGuire et al. (2006).combination with wetland expansion drivenby a positive P–E trend predicted by the model.About 80% of the increase was due to enhancedflux rates, and 20% due to expanded wetlandarea or duration of inundation. The predicted increasein the atmospheric methane burden was1,000 Tg, ~20% of the current total, equivalentto an increase of ~430 ppb, assuming a methanelifetime of 8.9 years. Utilizing a similar approachbut with different climate and emissionmodels, Gedney et al. (2004) project that globalwetland emissions (including rice paddies) willroughly double, despite a slight reduction inwetland area. The northern wetland methaneemissions, in particular, increase by 100% (44to 84 Tg CH 4 yr –1 ) in response to increasingsoil temperatures and in spite of a simulated10% reduction in northern wetland areal extent.Using a more process-based ecosystem model,which includes parameterizations for methaneproduction and emission, Zhuang et al. (2007)model a doubling of methane emissions over the21st century in Alaska, once again primarilyin response to the soil temperature influenceon methanogenesis, and secondarily to anincrease in net primary productivity of Alaskanecosystems. These factors outweigh a negativecontribution to methane emissions related to asimulated drop in the water table. It is importantto note that these models simulate only199

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!