Book 2.indb - US Climate Change Science Program

More documents

Recommendations

Info

The U.S. Climate Change Science ProgramChapter 3Figure 3.5. Observed temperature (°C) and precipitation (millimeters) anomalies(June 1998–May 2002). Figure from http://www.oar.noaa.gov/spotlite/archive/spot_drought.html.Figure 3.6. Model-simulated temperature (°C) and precipitation (millimeters) anomaliesgiven observed SSTs over the June 1998–May 2002 period. GCM, General CirculationModel. Figure from http://www.oar.noaa.gov/spotlite/archive/spot_drought.html.The Hoerling and Kumar (2003) analysisillustrates how changes in regional climate conditionssuch as slow increases in Indo-Pacific“Warm Pool” SSTs, when exceeding criticalenvironmental thresholds, can lead to abruptshifts in climate regimes (e.g., the anomalousatmospheric circulation patterns), which inturn alter the hydrologic response to naturalvariability. The study points out that the overallpattern of warmth in the Indian and west PacificOceans was both unprecedented and consistentwith greenhouse gas forcing of climate change.Could similar abrupt shifts in climate regimesexplain the persistence of droughts in the past?From a paleoclimatic perspective, simulationsby Shin et al. (2006) using an AtmosphericGeneral Circulation Model (AGCM) witha “slab” ocean, and by Liu et al. (2003) and84
Abrupt Climate ChangeHarrison et al. (2003) with a fully coupledAtmosphere-Ocean General Circulation Model(AOGCM) indicate that a change in the meanstate of tropical Pacific SSTs to more La Niñalikeconditions can explain North Americandrought conditions during the mid-Holocene.An analysis of Medieval hydrology by Seageret al. (2007a) suggests the widespread droughtin North America occurred in response to coldtropical Pacific SSTs and warm subtropicalNorth Atlantic SSTs externally forced by highirradiance and weak volcanic activity (seeMann et al., 2005; Emile-Geay et al., 2007).2.3 Is There Evidence Yet forAnthropogenic Forcing of Drought?Analyses by Karoly et al. (2003) and Nicholls(2004) suggest that 2002 drought and associatedheat waves in Australia were more extremethan the earlier droughts because the impactof the low rainfall was exacerbated by highpotential evaporation. Zhang et al. (2007) havesuggested that large-scale precipitation trendscan be attributed to anthropogenic influences.However, there is no clear evidence to date ofhuman-induced global climate change on NorthAmerican precipitation amounts. The FourthAssessment Report (AR4) of the IPCC (IPCC,2007) presents maps of the trend in precipitationover the period 1901 to 2005 that show mostlyweak moistening over most of North Americaand a weak drying in the Southwest. This isnot very surprising in that both the first twodecades and the last two decades of the 20thcentury were anomalously wet over much ofNorth America (Swetnam and Betancourt,1998; Fye et al., 2003; Seager et al., 2005b;Woodhouse et al., 2005). The wettest decadesbetween the 1976/77 and 1997/98 El Niños mayhave been caused by natural Pacific decadalvariability (Huang et al., 2005). In contrastto the 20th-century record, the southern partsof North America are projected to dry as aconsequence of anthropogenic climate change.After the 1997/98 El Niño, drought has indeedsettled into the West, but since it has gone alongwith a more La Niña-like Pacific Ocean thismakes it difficult to determine if some part ofthe drying is anthropogenic.Trends based on the shorter period of thepost-1950 period show a clear moistening ofNorth America, but this period extends fromthe 1950s drought to the end of the late-20thcentury wet period (or pluvial). The 1950sdrought has been linked to tropical Pacific andAtlantic SSTs and is presumed to have been anaturally occurring event. Further, the trendfrom 1950 to the end of the last century is likelyto have been caused by the multidecadal changefrom a more La Niña-like tropical Pacific before1976 to a more El Niño-like Pacific from 1976to 1998 (Zhang et al., 1997), a transition usuallyknown as the 1976–77 climate or regime shift,which caused wet conditions in the mid-latitudeAmericas (Huang et al., 2005). Again, thischange in Pacific SSTs is generally assumed tohave been a result of natural Pacific variability,and it has been shown that simple models of thetropical Pacific alone can create multidecadalvariations that have this character (Karspeck etal., 2004). The warm phase of tropical Pacificdecadal variability may have ended with the1997/98 El Niño, after which La Niña-like conditionsprevailed until 2002 followed by weakEl Niños and a return to La Niña in 2007. Inthese post-1998 years, drought conditions havealso prevailed across the West as in previousperiods of persistent La Niñas. Consequently, itwould be very premature to state that the recentdrought heralds a period of anthropogenic dryingas opposed to the continuation of naturaldecadal and multidecadal variations. Detailedanalysis of not only precipitation patterns butalso patterns of stationary and transient atmosphericcirculation, water vapor transports, andSSTs may be able to draw a distinction, but thishas not yet been done.A different view is offered by Vecchi et al.(2006), who used sea level pressure (SLP) datato show a weakening of the along-Equatoreast-to-west SLP gradient from the late-19thcentury to the current one. The rapid weakeningof this gradient during the 1976–77 climate shiftcontributes to this trend. Vecchi et al. (2006)showed that coupled climate model simulationsof the 20th century forced by changes in CO 2 ,solar irradiance, and other factors also exhibita weakening of the SLP gradient—a weakerWalker Circulation—which could be takento mean that the 1976–77 shift, and associatedwetting of North America, contained ananthropogenic component. However, as notedin the previous paragraph, it would be verypremature to state that the post-1998 period85
Page 5 and 6:
TABLE OF CONTENTSAuthor Team for th
Page 8 and 9:
The U.S. Climate Change Science Pro
Page 10 and 11:
PREFACEReport Motivation and Guidan
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 21 and 22:
1CHAPTERAbrupt Climate ChangeIntrod
Page 23 and 24:
Abrupt Climate Change-35Arctic temp
Page 25 and 26:
Abrupt Climate ChangeFigure 1.2. Po
Page 27 and 28:
Abrupt Climate Changewell below sea
Page 29 and 30:
Abrupt Climate Changeheterogeneous
Page 31 and 32:
Abrupt Climate Changeapart from dro
Page 33 and 34:
Abrupt Climate Change6. Abrupt Chan
Page 35 and 36:
Abrupt Climate Changeintermediate c
Page 37 and 38:
Abrupt Climate Changeper square met
Page 39:
Abrupt Climate Changeis the norther
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44:
Page 47 and 48: Abrupt Climate ChangeRegardless how
Page 49 and 50: Abrupt Climate Changecentrations, a
Page 51 and 52: Abrupt Climate ChangeBox 2.1. Glaci
Page 53 and 54: Abrupt Climate Changetime. Degree-d
Page 55 and 56: Abrupt Climate Changetion, and accu
Page 57 and 58: Abrupt Climate ChangeBox 2.2. Mass
Page 59 and 60: Abrupt Climate Changeof the glacier
Page 61 and 62: Abrupt Climate ChangeFigure 2.6. Ra
Page 63 and 64: Abrupt Climate Changewater) or, mor
Page 65 and 66: Abrupt Climate ChangeFigure 2.7. Re
Page 67 and 68: Abrupt Climate Changeresults in a l
Page 69 and 70: Abrupt Climate Changeis not providi
Page 71 and 72: Abrupt Climate Changemeasurements c
Page 73 and 74: Abrupt Climate Changemore than 10,0
Page 75 and 76: Abrupt Climate Changeocean models h
Page 77 and 78: Abrupt Climate Changeto atmosphere-
Page 79 and 80: 3CHAPTERHydrological Variability an
Page 81 and 82: Abrupt Climate Change• The integr
Page 83 and 84: Abrupt Climate Changethe soil (King
Page 85 and 86: Abrupt Climate Changeon (Kaplan et
Page 87 and 88: Abrupt Climate Changeorbital-time-s
Page 89 and 90: Abrupt Climate ChangeFigure 3.4. (t
Page 91 and 92: Abrupt Climate Changemodels forced
Page 93 and 94: Abrupt Climate ChangeBox 3.2. Waves
Page 95: Abrupt Climate Changebecause (1) th
Page 99 and 100: Abrupt Climate Changethat even the
Page 101 and 102: Abrupt Climate Changethat seen afte
Page 103 and 104: Abrupt Climate Changeentire period
Page 105 and 106: Abrupt Climate Changelong-lived gre
Page 107 and 108: Abrupt Climate Changeplanetary-scal
Page 109 and 110: Abrupt Climate ChangeBox 3.3. Paleo
Page 111 and 112: Abrupt Climate Changerelated to the
Page 113 and 114: Abrupt Climate Changeinto the North
Page 115 and 116: Abrupt Climate ChangeThe summertime
Page 117 and 118: Abrupt Climate Change(Anderson et a
Page 119 and 120: Abrupt Climate ChangeHere the model
Page 121 and 122: Abrupt Climate Changetropical tropo
Page 123 and 124: Abrupt Climate Changefunctions; Koc
Page 125 and 126: Abrupt Climate Changechanges than t
Page 127: Abrupt Climate Changeboundary condi
Page 130 and 131: The U.S. Climate Change Science Pro
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Page 156 and 157:
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Page 170 and 171:
Page 172 and 173:
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
202REFERENCESChapter 1 ReferencesAl
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258:
U.S. Climate Change Science Program
show all

Book 2.indb - US Climate Change Science Program

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?