12.07.2015 Views

Haematologica 2004;89: supplement no. 8 - Supplements ...

Haematologica 2004;89: supplement no. 8 - Supplements ...

Haematologica 2004;89: supplement no. 8 - Supplements ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

92Oral CommunicationsCO-138EVALUATION OF A BLEEDING SCORE FOR THE DIAGNOSISOF TYPE 1 VWDTosetto A,* Castaman G,* Roberti S,* Cappelletti A,*Peake I,° Goodeve A,° Federici AB, + Batlle J,^Meyer D,** Eikenboom J,°° Schneppenheim R, ++Ingerslev J,^^ Vorlova Z,*** Lethagen S,°°° Pasi J, +++Hill F,^^^ Rodeghiero F**San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy; °University ofSheffield, UK; + University of Milan, Italy; ^HospitalTeresa Herrera, Spain; **INSERM, France; °°LeidenUniversity Medical Center, Netherlands; ++ UniversityChildren Hospital, Hamburg, Germany; ^^UniversityHospital Skejby, Denmark; ***Institute of Hematologyand Blood Transfusion, Prague, Czech Republic;°°°University of Lund, Sweden; +++ Leicester RoyalInfirmary, UK; ^^^Birmingham Children Hospital, UKType 1 von Willebrand’s disease (VWD) is the mostprevalent hemorrhagic disorder in the population.Since <strong>no</strong> clinical or laboratory test is sufficiently specificand sensitive for the diag<strong>no</strong>sis of VWD, properclinical assessment is mandatory for the diag<strong>no</strong>sis. Toassess the sensitivity and specificity of a quantitativeclinical evaluation tool for the diag<strong>no</strong>sis of type 1VWD. A standardized bleeding questionnaire was evaluatedin 744 subjects belonging to 154 families witha diag<strong>no</strong>sis of type 1 VWD. The sample comprises 154index cases (IC), 277 affected family members (AFM)and 313 <strong>no</strong>n affected family members (NAFM). Bleedingsymptoms were entered in a database and for eachsubject a bleeding score was automatically generatedby a computer program. The score is the sum of thescore attributed to each bleeding symptom reported bythe individual from birth to the moment of diag<strong>no</strong>sis.For each symptom (e.g, epistaxis, bleeding after toothextaction or surgery, me<strong>no</strong>rrhagia) the score rangefrom 0 (<strong>no</strong> bleeding) to 4 (major bleeding requiringblood transfusion and/or replacement therapy). A-1score was attributed when <strong>no</strong> bleeding symptom wasreported despite at least two tooth extractions, surgeriesor deliveries. The median score was 0 in NAFM,5 in AFM, 9 in IC. A score above 2 identified 77% ofall affected individuals (AFM and IC) and excludes 88%of NAFM. There was a clear biological relationshipbetween the score and VWF:Rco (χ 2 =192.1, p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!