XVIII Congress of the Italian Society for Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research, Rome, Sept. 30-Oct. 3, <strong>2004</strong>183different combinations of reagent/instrument used.Data are classified as: A if they are between ±1 Z-score, B if between ±2 Z-score, C if between ±3 Z-score and D if above/below 3 Z-score or outliers. Participantsare immediately contacted if results arepersistently (3 consecutive exercises) above the fixedacceptable limits (± 1 Z-score). Elaboration of datafrom 1990 to 2003 shows that labs with consistentparticipation have consistent and statisticallyimprovement in performance. In 2003 80% of allparticipant labs showed results in class A. Data alsosuggest that labs with more experience with proficiencytesting have lower rate of unacceptableresults and that this rate tends to decrease with eachyear of experience. These conclusions support thefindings of other researchers who have documentedthe benefits of inter-laboratory comparison programsand proficiency testing.PO-174ISAM: INTERNATIONAL STUDY OF ANTICOAGULATIONMANAGEMENT. THE ITALIAN EXPERIENCEPengo V, 1 Adriani C, 1 Alatri A, 2 Antonucci E, 3Baudo F, 4 Caimi TM, 4 Cauli C, 5 Lopatriello S, 6Malato A, 7 Ma<strong>no</strong>tti C, 8 Marongiu F, 5 Negrini C, 6Poli D, 3 Siragusa S, 7 Tassoni MI, 8 Testa S, 2 Attinà G 91Dip. di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Sezione diCardiologia, Ospedale di Padova; 2 Centro Emostasie Trombosi, Istituti Ospedalieri, Cremona; 3 Dip. delCuore e dei Vasi, Unità di Malattie Aterotrombotiche,Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Careggi,Florence; 4 Strutt. Compl. di Ematologia, OspedaleNiguarda-Cà granda-Mila<strong>no</strong>; 5 Cattedra di MedicinaInterna, Policlinico Universitario di Monserrato,Università di Cagliari; 6 PBE Consulting S.r.L, Mila<strong>no</strong>;7Cattedra di Ematologia dell'Università di Palermo;8Centro Emostasi, Ospedale Maggiore di Parma;9Eco<strong>no</strong>mic Affairs, AstraZeneca Italia; ItalyObjectives. ISAM, a multicenter, observational, retrospective,cross-sectional study, aimed at describingthe anticoagulation treatment monitoring onpatients with chronic <strong>no</strong>n-valvular atrial fibrillation(CNVAF) for stroke prophylaxis (follow-up: Jan-Dec2002); and estimating the direct and indirect costsassociated with Oral Anticoagulation Therapy (OAT)according to the Italian National Health System perspective.Methods. 7 out of 8 AntiCoagulation Clinics(ACCs), selected to represent the whole Italianterritory, enrolled 23 randomized patients withCNVAF. Results. The total number of patients was177: 102 were males and 75 females (mean age 72years); 90% was affected by chronic Atrial Fibrillationand 10% by paroxysmal. 77% received warfarinand 23% ace<strong>no</strong>cumarol. Only 18% had <strong>no</strong> risk factors,64% had hypertension, 12% diabetes, 32% previousthromboembolic events, 24% coronary arterydisease and 12% congestive heart failure. Everypatient had on average 19 INR tests per year (meanfrequency: every 20 days); 40% of total tests (3168)required dosage changes and 73% were in the recommendedrange (2.0-3.0) anyway. Quality of OATmonitoring, according to Rosendaal's method, was:67.9% of time was spent in the range 2.0-3.0, 21%below and 10% above this range. Total cost perpatient per year was 943 : 745 ¤ direct costs and198 ¤ indirect ones (productivity loss by patients ortheir caregivers). Medical costs, 525 ¤, included OA Tdrug (5%), INR tests (18%) monitoring visits (44%)and admissions (33%). Non-medical costs (transportation)amounted to 220 . Conclusions. Patientsin ACC management could obtain good level of INRcontrol: Time in Target Range 67.9%, comparablewith other literature findings. ISAM is a first attemptto measured the resource consumption generated bythe monitoring system (ACCs) associated with a goodlevel of control, and whose costs include drugs, INRtests and monitoring visits, which are the majorcomponents of such costs.haematologica vol. <strong>89</strong>(suppl. n. 8):september <strong>2004</strong>
184PostersPostersTHERAPY OF HEMOPHILIAPO-175PHYSICIANS’ AND PHARMACISTS’ PREFERENCES FORHEMOPHILIA TREATMENT EVALUATED BY CONJOINT ANALYSISScalone L,* Monzini MS,* Mantovani LG,*Gringeri A,^ Villa M,° Mannucci PM^ for theCONAN Study Group*Center of Pharmacoeco<strong>no</strong>mics, Department ofPharmacological Sciences, University of Milan,Milan, Italy; ^Angelo Bianchi Bo<strong>no</strong>mi Hemophiliaand Thrombosis Center, Department of InternalMedicine and Dermatology, University of Milan andIRCCS Maggiore Hospital, Milan, Italy; °Laboratoryof Epidemiology, Advanced Biotech<strong>no</strong>logy Institute,National Research Council, Milan, ItalyBackground. Hemophilia care entails the absorptio<strong>no</strong>f huge amounts of human and eco<strong>no</strong>micresources. The treatment of hemophilia involves acomplex interaction between patients, physicians andpolicy-makers. Aim. To evaluate the preferences ofphysicians and pharmacists toward products used forreplacement therapy. Methods. This study investigatespreferences on hemophilia care in 69 physicians and58 pharmacists using conjoint analysis, a techniquefor establishing the relative importance of differentcharacteristics in the provision of a good or service.Attributes and levels were: perceived viral safety (asthat provided by highly purified double inactivationplasma derived versus recombinant concentrates), riskof inhibitor development (1/4, 1/6, 1/10 PUP’s), factorinfusion frequency on prophylaxis (thrice, twice,once a week), pharmaceutical dosage form(lyophilized material or a ready-to-use solution), wayof distribution (home, office pharmacy, hospital) andprice. Results. Excluding pharmaceutical dosage formfor physicians and office pharmacy delivery for pharmacists,all attributes considered tested important torespondents. Physicians showed a strong preferencetoward both outcome variables (viral safety, risk ofdevelopment of inhibitors) and process variables (distribution,infusion frequency) while pharmacistsshowed a strong preference only for outcome variablesand unexpectedly <strong>no</strong>t toward way of distribution.Conclusions. Our study is the first to apply conjointanalysis to establish preferences of physiciansand pharmacists in hemophilia replacement therapy.This study provided evidence of the usefulness of conjointanalysis in plan optimal health care through theelicitation of physicians’ and pharmacists’ preferencesto health care, even in the particular context of hemophiliamanagement.PO-176CLINICAL AND SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICSINFLUENCE PATIENTS’ PREFERENCES TOWARDS HEMOPHILIATREATMENTMantovani LG,* Gringeri A,^ Scalone L,*Monzini MS,* Villa M,° Mannucci PM^ for TheCONAN Study Group*Center of Pharmacoeco<strong>no</strong>mics, Department ofPharmacological Sciences, University of Milan,Milan, Italy; ^Angelo Bianchi Bo<strong>no</strong>mi Hemophiliaand Thrombosis Center, Department of InternalMedicine and Dermatology, University of Milan andIRCCS Maggiore Hospital, Milan, Italy; °Laboratoryof Epidemiology, Advanced Biotech<strong>no</strong>logy Institute,National Research Council, Milan, ItalyBackground. Clinical and sociodemographic characteristicsmight affect patients’ preferences towardshemophilia treatment. Aim. The aim of this work is toevaluate influence of clinical and socio-demographiccharacteristics on the strength of preferencestowards each characteristic. Methods. We analyzeddata originated by CONAN database from 178patients. Patients were asked to make choicesbetween variables of replacement therapy such asperceived viral safety, risk of inhibitor development,infusion frequency on prophylaxis, pharmaceuticaldosage form, way of distribution and price. Results.The value of each characteristic was indicated by itsmonetary value: the monetary value for perceivedviral safety was greater for moderate (2,547€) comparedto severe hemophiliacs (1,810€) and wasgreater for patients in recombinant treatment(2,421€) to plasma derived (1,001€). Compared tomoderate hemophiliacs, severe hemophiliacs placed ahigher value on the decrease in the risk of developinginhibitors (1,033€ vs. 518€) and on the infusion frequency(706€ vs. 144€). The employment statusplayed an important role on monetary values attributedto way of distribution: employed patients placeda higher monetary value to home delivery (1,495 €)and office pharmacy distribution (25<strong>89</strong> €) comparedto self-employed patients (541€ and <strong>89</strong>€, respectively)and to unemployed patients (1,002€ and928€). Conclusions. We demonstrate that clinical andsocio-demographic characteristics influencedpatients’ preferences. One of the practical utilities ofconjoint analysis consist in the capability of targetdifferent group with different characteristics thatconsequently require different therapeutic decisions.This allow to plan optimal hemophilia care.haematologica vol. <strong>89</strong>(suppl. n. 8):september <strong>2004</strong>