EAKIN, H. 2010. What is Vulnerable? In: INGRAM, J., ERICKSEN, P. & LIVERMAN, D. (eds.)<strong>Food</strong> <strong>Security</strong> and <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Change. London: Earthscan.EASTERLING, W. E., AGRAWAL, P. K., BATIMA, P., BRANDER, K., ERDA, L., HOWDEN, M.,KIRILENKO, A., MORTON, J., SOUSSANA, J.-F., SCHMIDHUBER, J. & TUBIELLO, F.2007. <strong>Food</strong>, Fibre, and Forest Products. In: PARRY, M. L., CANZIANI, O. F.,PALUTIKOF, J. P., VAN DER LINDEN, P. J. & HANSON, C. E. (eds.) Climate Change2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II <strong>to</strong> the FourthAssessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.EDWARDS, J., KLEINSCHMIT, J. & SCHOONOVER, H. 2009. Identifying our Climate“<strong>Food</strong>print”: Assessing and Reducing the <strong>Global</strong> Warming Impacts of <strong>Food</strong> and Agriculturein the U.S.: Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy.ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY. 2010. Chilling Facts: Supermarket RefrigerationScandal Uncovered. Available: http://www.eiainternational.org/cgi/news/news.cgi?t=template&a=499.ERICKSEN, P. J. 2008a. Conceptualizing <strong>Food</strong> Systems for <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Change Research.<strong>Global</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Change, 18, 234-245.ERICKSEN, P. J. 2008b. What is the vulnerability of a food system <strong>to</strong> global environmental change?Ecology and Society, 13.ERICKSEN, P. J., INGRAM, J. S. I. & LIVERMAN, D. M. 2009. <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Security</strong> and <strong>Global</strong><strong>Environmental</strong> Change: Emerging Challenges. <strong>Environmental</strong> Science and Policy, 12, 373-377.ERICKSEN, P. J., STEWART, B., DIXON, J., BARLING, D., LORING, P., ANDERSON, M. &INGRAM, J. 2010a. The Value of a <strong>Food</strong> System Approach. In: INGRAM, J., ERICKSEN,P. & LIVERMAN, D. (eds.) <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Security</strong> and <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Change. London:Earthscan.ERICKSEN, P. J., STEWART, B., ERIKSEN, S., TSCHAKERT, P., SABATES-WHEELER, R.,HANSEN, J. & THORNTON, P. 2010b. Adapting <strong>Food</strong> Systems. In: INGRAM, J.,ERICKSEN, P. & LIVERMAN, D. (eds.) <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Security</strong> and <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Change.London: Earthscan.ESF 2009. European <strong>Food</strong> Systems in a Changing World. ESF-COST Forward Look Report.Strasbourg.EU. 2011. <strong>Food</strong> security under threat: global response needed [Online]. Available:http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=IM-PRESS&reference=20110216IPR13780&format=XML&language=EN [Accessed 17February 2011.EVANS, L. T. 1998. Feeding the Ten Billion, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.EWERT, F., ROUNSEVELL, M. D. A., REGINSTER, I., METZGER, M. G. & LEEMANS, R. 2005.Future scenarios of European agricultural land use. I. Estimating changes in crop productivity.Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 107, 101-116.FAO 1996a. Report of the World <strong>Food</strong> Summit. Rome: FAO.FAO 1996b. Rome Declaration and World <strong>Food</strong> Summit Plan of Action. Rome: FAO.FAO 2003. Trade reforms and food security: conceptualizing the linkages. Rome: FAO.FAO 2008a. Climate change and food security: a framework document. Rome: InterdepartmentalWorking Group on Climate Change of the FAO.FAO. 2008b. <strong>Food</strong> Outlook: 'Falling prices in perspective'. Available:www.fao.org/docrep/011/ai474e/ai474e13.htm [Accessed undated].FAO 2009a. The State of Agricultural Commodity Markets (SACM): High food prices and the foodcrisis - experiences and lessons learned. Rome: FAO.128
FAO 2009b. The State of <strong>Food</strong> Insecurity in the World (SOFI): Economic crises - impacts and lessonslearned. Rome: FAO.FAO 2010. The State of <strong>Food</strong> Insecurity in the World (SOFI): Addressing food insecurity inprotracted crises. Rome.FAOSTAT 2006. FAOSTAT Data.FISCHER, G., SHAH, M., TUBIELLO, F. N. & VAN VELHUIZEN, H. 2005. Socio-economic andclimate change impacts on agriculture: an integrated assessment, 1990-2080. PhilosophicalTransactions of the Royal Society Biological Sciences, 360, 2067-2083.FISCHER, G., SHAH, M., VAN VELTHUIZEN, H. & NACHTERGAELE, F. O. 2001. <strong>Global</strong> AgroecologicalAssessment for Agriculture in the 21st Century. Laxenburg, Austria: InternationalInstitute for Applied Systems Analysis.FLEGAL, K. M., CARROLL, M. D., OGDEN, C. L. & CURTIN, L. R. 2010. Prevalence and Trendsin Obesity Among US Adults, 1999-2008. JAMA: The Journal of the American MedicalAssociation, 303, 235-241.FOOD CLIMATE RESEARCH NETWORK. 2011. http://www.fcrn.org.uk/ [Online]. [Accessed 3March 2011.FORESIGHT 2011. The Future of <strong>Food</strong> and Farming. Final Project Report. London: The GovernmentOffice for Science.FUHRER, J. 2003. Agroecosystem responses <strong>to</strong> combinations of elevated CO 2 , ozone, and globalclimate change. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. , 97, 1-20.FUHRER, J. 2006. Agricultural systems: sensitivity <strong>to</strong> climate change. CAB reviews: perspectives inagriculture, veterinary science, nutrition and natural resources 1.G8. 2009. Responsible Leadership for a Sustainable Future, accessed on line 7 February 2011.GECAFS 2005. Science Plan and Implementation Strategy. In: INGRAM, J. S. I., GREGORY, P. J.& BRKLACICH, M. (eds.) Earth System Science Partnership (IGBP, IHDP, WCRP,DIVERSITAS) Report No. 2. Wallingford.GECAFS 2006a. GECAFS Southern Africa Science Plan and Implementation Strategy. GECAFSReport No. 3. Oxford.GECAFS 2006b. A Set of Pro<strong>to</strong>type Caribbean Scenarios for Research on <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong>Change and Regional <strong>Food</strong> Systems. Wallingford: GECAFS.GECAFS 2007. GECAFS Caribbean Science Plan and Implementation Strategy. GECAFS Report No.4. Oxford.GECAFS 2008. GECAFS Indo-Gangetic Plain Science Plan and Implementation Strategy. GECAFSReport No. 5. Oxford.GIBBONS, M., LIMOGES, C., NOWOTNY, H., SCHWARTZMAN, S., SCOTT, P. & TROW, M.1994. The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research incontemporary societies, London, Sage.GIBSON, B. 2003a. Beyond two communities. In: LIN, V. & GIBSON, B. (eds.) Evidence-basedHealth Policy. Problems and Possibilities. Oxford University Press.GIBSON, B. 2003b. <strong>From</strong> transfer <strong>to</strong> transformation: rethinking the relationship between research andpolicy. PhD, Australian National University.GIBSON, C. C., OSTROM, E. & AHN, T. K. 2000. The concept of scale and the human dimensionsof global change: a survey. Ecological Economics, 32, 217-239.GILLER, K. E., LEEUWIS, C., ANDERSSON, J. A., ANDRIESSE, W., BROUWER, A., FROST,P., HEBINCK, P., HEITKÖNIG, I., VAN ITTERSUM, M. K., KONING, N., RUBEN, R.,SLINGERLAND, M., UDO, H., VELDKAMP, T., VAN DE VIJVER, C., VAN WIJK, M. T.& WINDMEIJER, P. 2008. Competing claims on natural resources: What role for science?Ecology and Society, 13.129
- Page 1 and 2:
From Food Production to Food Securi
- Page 3 and 4:
From Food Production to Food Securi
- Page 5 and 6:
Table of ContentsAbstract .........
- Page 7 and 8:
Paper 6: Undertaking Research at th
- Page 9:
AbstractFood security is a conditio
- Page 12 and 13:
2010 about 925 million people had t
- Page 14 and 15:
water) are used, and reduce negativ
- Page 16 and 17:
While the flow of the argument abou
- Page 18 and 19:
determine interactions along and be
- Page 20 and 21:
Paper 3: A Food Systems Approach to
- Page 23:
From Food Production to Food Securi
- Page 26 and 27:
concerns and are now issues that mu
- Page 28 and 29:
the relationships between GEC and f
- Page 30 and 31:
Theme 2 aims to understand how comm
- Page 32 and 33:
GEC and the Food System of the Indo
- Page 34 and 35:
Paper 2: The role of agronomic rese
- Page 36 and 37:
These advances have resulted from a
- Page 38 and 39:
Crop selection to determine mechani
- Page 40 and 41:
Agronomic science is central to imp
- Page 42 and 43:
Agronomic research in relation to f
- Page 44 and 45:
The discussion above identifies a n
- Page 46 and 47:
interventions and political inertia
- Page 48 and 49:
While research on producing food ha
- Page 50 and 51:
Box 1 Food system Activities and fo
- Page 52 and 53:
In addition to broadening the debat
- Page 54 and 55:
options. Examples already seen rang
- Page 56 and 57:
Figure 3 Outcomes for 10 variables
- Page 58 and 59:
Figure 4 Nine ‘planetary boundari
- Page 60 and 61:
Figure 5 Environmental change, food
- Page 62 and 63:
Table 1: Indicative analysis of the
- Page 65:
From Food Production to Food Securi
- Page 68 and 69:
Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Eur
- Page 70 and 71:
Parry et al., 2005). Conducting foo
- Page 72 and 73:
is provided in the ESF/COST Forward
- Page 74 and 75:
Paper 5: Engaging Stakeholders at t
- Page 76 and 77:
into actions (strategies, policies,
- Page 78 and 79:
Box 2 Engaging with stakeholders in
- Page 80 and 81:
Box 3 Setting the research agenda f
- Page 82 and 83:
Third, and of considerable practica
- Page 84 and 85:
Figure 2: Organizing and understand
- Page 86 and 87:
organizations made up of numerous n
- Page 88 and 89: Elements of good practice in stakeh
- Page 90 and 91: Finally, it is worth noting that fo
- Page 92 and 93: development (Lee, 1999; Gunderson a
- Page 94 and 95: Box 7 The GECAFS stakeholder survey
- Page 96 and 97: ‘break down’ what might be a hi
- Page 98 and 99: Paper 6: Undertaking Research at th
- Page 100 and 101: agriculture in many parts of the wo
- Page 102 and 103: gaps. The presence of a strong tech
- Page 104 and 105: an average of two years to coalesce
- Page 106 and 107: Institute for Meteorology and Hydro
- Page 108 and 109: Identifying case study sitesResearc
- Page 110 and 111: can both benefit from and contribut
- Page 112 and 113: Box 5 Mapping stakeholder interests
- Page 114 and 115: Holding planning meetings in locati
- Page 116 and 117: This reorientation of the debate fr
- Page 118 and 119: Importance of this type of research
- Page 120 and 121: Integrating the food system concept
- Page 122 and 123: awareness of the GEC issues within
- Page 124 and 125: pollutants were then introduced as
- Page 126 and 127: communities operating in food syste
- Page 128 and 129: Improving input-use efficiency acro
- Page 130 and 131: governance focuses on the range of
- Page 132 and 133: Developing research agendas in supp
- Page 134 and 135: The renewed approach to interdiscip
- Page 136 and 137: BIELAK, A., HOLMES, J., SAVGÅRD, J
- Page 140 and 141: GODFRAY, H. C. J., BEDDINGTON, J. R
- Page 142 and 143: INGRAM, J. S. I. & FERNANDES, E. C.
- Page 144 and 145: LYUTSE, S. 2010. The One Billion To
- Page 146 and 147: RAYNER, S. & MALONE, E. L. 1998. Hu
- Page 148 and 149: UNDP 2006. The 2006 Human Developme
- Page 150 and 151: activities “from plough to plate
- Page 152 and 153: contribution to the science agenda:
- Page 154 and 155: urgently needed, and - given the gr
- Page 156 and 157: GECAFS plannenmakerij stelde vast d
- Page 158 and 159: ieder hun eigen groep van betrokken
- Page 160 and 161: het gebied van beheer hebben betrek
- Page 162: Curriculum VitaeFollowing a BSc in