The discussion above identifies a number of research challenges facing the agronomicresearch community. The final point relates <strong>to</strong> the overall viewpoints from whichresearchers, resource managers and policy makers operate. These viewpoints need <strong>to</strong> bereconsidered for the innovative agronomic research approaches <strong>to</strong> address food securityconcerns in the face of climate change <strong>to</strong> have maximum effectiveness (Table 1). Suchreconsiderations will both heighten the relevance of agronomic research <strong>to</strong> the broader foodsecurity issues and help deliver more policy-relevant outputs. They are, of course, needed notjust on the part of agronomists, but on the part of all the other sciences and disciplines that arerelevant <strong>to</strong> agricultural research for development.ConclusionsWhile agronomic research alone cannot solve all food security/climate change issues (andhence the balance of investment in research and development for crop production vis a visother aspects of food security needs <strong>to</strong> be assessed), it will nevertheless continue <strong>to</strong> have animportant role <strong>to</strong> play: it both improves understanding of the impacts of climate change oncrop production and helps <strong>to</strong> develop adaptation options; and also – and crucially – itimproves understanding of the consequences of different adaptation options on further climateforcing. This role can further be strengthened if agronomists work alongside other agriculturalscientists <strong>to</strong> develop adaptation options that are not only effective in terms of cropproduction, but are also environmentally and economically robust, at landscape and regionalscales. Agronomists also need <strong>to</strong> work with a wide range of other disciplines, and acrosssec<strong>to</strong>rs of the food industry, <strong>to</strong> develop the necessary new research approaches and paradigms<strong>to</strong> better link research on food production <strong>to</strong> food security issues. Such novel approaches morelikely <strong>to</strong> deliver scientific outputs better suited <strong>to</strong> the information needs of policy makers.34
Paper 3: A <strong>Food</strong> Systems Approach <strong>to</strong> Researching <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Security</strong> and its Interactionswith <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> ChangeAdapted from:Ingram, JSI. A <strong>Food</strong> Systems Approach <strong>to</strong> Researching <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Security</strong> and its Interactionswith <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Environmental</strong> Change. Re-submitted with revisions <strong>to</strong> <strong>Food</strong> <strong>Security</strong>, 3June 2011.<strong>Food</strong> security – a re-emerged <strong>to</strong>pic“The world now produces enough food <strong>to</strong> feed its population. The problem is notsimply technical. It is a political and social problem. It is a problem of access <strong>to</strong>food supplies, of distribution, and of entitlement. Above all it is a problem ofpolitical will.” Boutros Boutros-Ghali, Conference on Overcoming <strong>Global</strong>Hunger, Washing<strong>to</strong>n DC, 30 November 1993 (quoted in Shaw, 2007).<strong>Food</strong> security (or more correctly, food insecurity) has long been associated with ‘developingworld’ issues. <strong>From</strong> the perspective of the industrialised world, it has hence been the purviewof development agencies (e.g. AusAID, 2004; U.S. Government, 2010), rather thangovernment departments and other national agencies concerned with domestic agendas. In theUK, for instance, few – if any – government documents since the Second World War aboutconditions within the UK included ‘food security’ in the title. Recently, however, and largelydriven by the food price ‘spike’ in 2007-08, the notion of food security has rapidly ascendedpolicy, societal and science agendas in countries worldwide, and has been the <strong>to</strong>pic of specialissues of leading scientific journals e.g. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B(Godfray et al., 2010a) and Science (Science, 2010), government reports (e.g. Defra, 2006;EU, 2011; Foresight, 2011) and leading high-circulation media such as the Economist (21November 2009; 24 February 2011). While most attention is directed <strong>to</strong>wards the plight ofmany in the developing world, it is important <strong>to</strong> note that food insecurity occurs in allcountries <strong>to</strong> some extent: in the US, for instance, the problem affects nearly 13 millionhouseholds annually (Wisconsin WIC Program, 2007).Much of the food security debate understandably centres on aspects of food production andthis has long been the subject of major research investment. Increasing production has alwaysbeen an important strategy <strong>to</strong> help alleviate food insecurity, and it still is <strong>to</strong>day. There ishence still a strong sentiment that producing more food will satisfy society’s needs, andtheoretically this is of course the case: produce enough and all will be fed. However, despitethe fact that more than enough food is currently produced per capita <strong>to</strong> adequately feed theglobal population, about 925 million people remained food insecure in 2010 (FAO, 2010).For many, this gap in production vs. need is more related <strong>to</strong> the political economy of35
- Page 1 and 2: From Food Production to Food Securi
- Page 3 and 4: From Food Production to Food Securi
- Page 5 and 6: Table of ContentsAbstract .........
- Page 7 and 8: Paper 6: Undertaking Research at th
- Page 9: AbstractFood security is a conditio
- Page 12 and 13: 2010 about 925 million people had t
- Page 14 and 15: water) are used, and reduce negativ
- Page 16 and 17: While the flow of the argument abou
- Page 18 and 19: determine interactions along and be
- Page 20 and 21: Paper 3: A Food Systems Approach to
- Page 23: From Food Production to Food Securi
- Page 26 and 27: concerns and are now issues that mu
- Page 28 and 29: the relationships between GEC and f
- Page 30 and 31: Theme 2 aims to understand how comm
- Page 32 and 33: GEC and the Food System of the Indo
- Page 34 and 35: Paper 2: The role of agronomic rese
- Page 36 and 37: These advances have resulted from a
- Page 38 and 39: Crop selection to determine mechani
- Page 40 and 41: Agronomic science is central to imp
- Page 42 and 43: Agronomic research in relation to f
- Page 46 and 47: interventions and political inertia
- Page 48 and 49: While research on producing food ha
- Page 50 and 51: Box 1 Food system Activities and fo
- Page 52 and 53: In addition to broadening the debat
- Page 54 and 55: options. Examples already seen rang
- Page 56 and 57: Figure 3 Outcomes for 10 variables
- Page 58 and 59: Figure 4 Nine ‘planetary boundari
- Page 60 and 61: Figure 5 Environmental change, food
- Page 62 and 63: Table 1: Indicative analysis of the
- Page 65: From Food Production to Food Securi
- Page 68 and 69: Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Eur
- Page 70 and 71: Parry et al., 2005). Conducting foo
- Page 72 and 73: is provided in the ESF/COST Forward
- Page 74 and 75: Paper 5: Engaging Stakeholders at t
- Page 76 and 77: into actions (strategies, policies,
- Page 78 and 79: Box 2 Engaging with stakeholders in
- Page 80 and 81: Box 3 Setting the research agenda f
- Page 82 and 83: Third, and of considerable practica
- Page 84 and 85: Figure 2: Organizing and understand
- Page 86 and 87: organizations made up of numerous n
- Page 88 and 89: Elements of good practice in stakeh
- Page 90 and 91: Finally, it is worth noting that fo
- Page 92 and 93: development (Lee, 1999; Gunderson a
- Page 94 and 95:
Box 7 The GECAFS stakeholder survey
- Page 96 and 97:
‘break down’ what might be a hi
- Page 98 and 99:
Paper 6: Undertaking Research at th
- Page 100 and 101:
agriculture in many parts of the wo
- Page 102 and 103:
gaps. The presence of a strong tech
- Page 104 and 105:
an average of two years to coalesce
- Page 106 and 107:
Institute for Meteorology and Hydro
- Page 108 and 109:
Identifying case study sitesResearc
- Page 110 and 111:
can both benefit from and contribut
- Page 112 and 113:
Box 5 Mapping stakeholder interests
- Page 114 and 115:
Holding planning meetings in locati
- Page 116 and 117:
This reorientation of the debate fr
- Page 118 and 119:
Importance of this type of research
- Page 120 and 121:
Integrating the food system concept
- Page 122 and 123:
awareness of the GEC issues within
- Page 124 and 125:
pollutants were then introduced as
- Page 126 and 127:
communities operating in food syste
- Page 128 and 129:
Improving input-use efficiency acro
- Page 130 and 131:
governance focuses on the range of
- Page 132 and 133:
Developing research agendas in supp
- Page 134 and 135:
The renewed approach to interdiscip
- Page 136 and 137:
BIELAK, A., HOLMES, J., SAVGÅRD, J
- Page 138 and 139:
EAKIN, H. 2010. What is Vulnerable?
- Page 140 and 141:
GODFRAY, H. C. J., BEDDINGTON, J. R
- Page 142 and 143:
INGRAM, J. S. I. & FERNANDES, E. C.
- Page 144 and 145:
LYUTSE, S. 2010. The One Billion To
- Page 146 and 147:
RAYNER, S. & MALONE, E. L. 1998. Hu
- Page 148 and 149:
UNDP 2006. The 2006 Human Developme
- Page 150 and 151:
activities “from plough to plate
- Page 152 and 153:
contribution to the science agenda:
- Page 154 and 155:
urgently needed, and - given the gr
- Page 156 and 157:
GECAFS plannenmakerij stelde vast d
- Page 158 and 159:
ieder hun eigen groep van betrokken
- Page 160 and 161:
het gebied van beheer hebben betrek
- Page 162:
Curriculum VitaeFollowing a BSc in