From Food Production to Food Security - Global Environmental ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

het gebied van beheer hebben betrekking op de locatie en concentratie van macht en de rolvan marketing en veranderend consumentengedrag ten aanzien van dieet en verspilling medein relatie tot de groeiende omgevingsagenda.De betrokkenheid van een groot aantal categorieën groepen van geïnteresseerden enbelanghebbenden (bijvoorbeeld onderzoekers, beleidsinstanties, de maatschappelijkeorganisaties, het bedrijfsleven en financiers) is vereist in alle fases van dergelijke studies. Datkan de transactiekosten voor alle partijen verhogen, maar door de verschijning van meerintermediaire organisaties worden die kosten verminderd en de kloof tussen beleid enwetenschap geslecht. Die organisaties spelen daarmee een sleutelrol bij de formulering vande onderzoeks- en de beleidsagenda.Een laatste punt betreft de noodzaak om t.b.v. voedselzekerheidsonderzoek de juisteinstitutionele organisaties te hebben.. De behoefte aan een verenigend institutioneelraamwerk wordt vooral gevoeld bij de integratie van GEC studies met andervoedselzekerheidsonderzoek. Dat is een pleidooi en rechtvaardiging voor éénmultidisciplinair GEC programma met een beheers- en beleidsstructuur die wordt bepaalddoor de vragen uit de samenleving. Indien er niet zo’n structuur komt, zal dit de ontwikkelingen implementatie van een interdisciplinaire onderzoeksagenda afremmen en demogelijkheden om nieuwe kennis volgens “Mode 2 research” afremmen.Deze samenvatting, ondersteund door de papers die in dit proefschrift zijn opgenomen,vragen om een meer holistische onderzoeksagenda en bepleiten een meer geïntegreerde wegvoorwaarts.150
AcknowledgmentsThe research presented in this Thesis draws on work conducted over many years. During thistime, I have had the great good fortune to be able to interact with a very large number ofresearchers, policymakers, development specialists, farmers and other resource managers,business people and donors, in many countries. These interactions have been fundamental tothe way my thinking has developed, and I am indebted to all those with whom I havecollaborated.I would also like to thank especially a number of key individuals, without whose help,encouragement and friendship the work presented in this Thesis would not have come about:Mike Swift, Bernard Tinker, Peter Gregory and Diana Liverman, for their inspirationalleadership, advice and direction; Mike Brklacich, Polly Ericksen, Thomas Henrichs andMonika Zurek, for their great help in developing, testing and refining many of the ideas andmethods discussed in this Thesis; Anita Ghosh, for her skill and diligence in helping toprepare for publication much of the work presented in this Thesis; and Rudy Rabbinge, forencouraging me to undertake this Thesis, and for his supervision and guidance during itspreparation.Finally, I would like to acknowledge the UK’s Natural Environment Research Council,without whose uninterrupted core support over many years the work would not have beenpossible; and many other UK and international donors, for providing research funding.This Thesis is a contribution to the Earth System Science Partnership’s Joint Project ‘GlobalEnvironmental Change and Food Systems’.151
Page 1 and 2:
From Food Production to Food Securi
Page 3 and 4:
Page 5 and 6:
Table of ContentsAbstract .........
Page 7 and 8:
Paper 6: Undertaking Research at th
Page 9:
AbstractFood security is a conditio
Page 12 and 13:
2010 about 925 million people had t
Page 14 and 15:
water) are used, and reduce negativ
Page 16 and 17:
While the flow of the argument abou
Page 18 and 19:
determine interactions along and be
Page 20 and 21:
Paper 3: A Food Systems Approach to
Page 23:
Page 26 and 27:
concerns and are now issues that mu
Page 28 and 29:
the relationships between GEC and f
Page 30 and 31:
Theme 2 aims to understand how comm
Page 32 and 33:
GEC and the Food System of the Indo
Page 34 and 35:
Paper 2: The role of agronomic rese
Page 36 and 37:
These advances have resulted from a
Page 38 and 39:
Crop selection to determine mechani
Page 40 and 41:
Agronomic science is central to imp
Page 42 and 43:
Agronomic research in relation to f
Page 44 and 45:
The discussion above identifies a n
Page 46 and 47:
interventions and political inertia
Page 48 and 49:
While research on producing food ha
Page 50 and 51:
Box 1 Food system Activities and fo
Page 52 and 53:
In addition to broadening the debat
Page 54 and 55:
options. Examples already seen rang
Page 56 and 57:
Figure 3 Outcomes for 10 variables
Page 58 and 59:
Figure 4 Nine ‘planetary boundari
Page 60 and 61:
Figure 5 Environmental change, food
Page 62 and 63:
Table 1: Indicative analysis of the
Page 65:
Page 68 and 69:
Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the Eur
Page 70 and 71:
Parry et al., 2005). Conducting foo
Page 72 and 73:
is provided in the ESF/COST Forward
Page 74 and 75:
Paper 5: Engaging Stakeholders at t
Page 76 and 77:
into actions (strategies, policies,
Page 78 and 79:
Box 2 Engaging with stakeholders in
Page 80 and 81:
Box 3 Setting the research agenda f
Page 82 and 83:
Third, and of considerable practica
Page 84 and 85:
Figure 2: Organizing and understand
Page 86 and 87:
organizations made up of numerous n
Page 88 and 89:
Elements of good practice in stakeh
Page 90 and 91:
Finally, it is worth noting that fo
Page 92 and 93:
development (Lee, 1999; Gunderson a
Page 94 and 95:
Box 7 The GECAFS stakeholder survey
Page 96 and 97:
‘break down’ what might be a hi
Page 98 and 99:
Paper 6: Undertaking Research at th
Page 100 and 101:
agriculture in many parts of the wo
Page 102 and 103:
gaps. The presence of a strong tech
Page 104 and 105:
an average of two years to coalesce
Page 106 and 107:
Institute for Meteorology and Hydro
Page 108 and 109:
Identifying case study sitesResearc
Page 110 and 111: can both benefit from and contribut
Page 112 and 113: Box 5 Mapping stakeholder interests
Page 114 and 115: Holding planning meetings in locati
Page 116 and 117: This reorientation of the debate fr
Page 118 and 119: Importance of this type of research
Page 120 and 121: Integrating the food system concept
Page 122 and 123: awareness of the GEC issues within
Page 124 and 125: pollutants were then introduced as
Page 126 and 127: communities operating in food syste
Page 128 and 129: Improving input-use efficiency acro
Page 130 and 131: governance focuses on the range of
Page 132 and 133: Developing research agendas in supp
Page 134 and 135: The renewed approach to interdiscip
Page 136 and 137: BIELAK, A., HOLMES, J., SAVGÅRD, J
Page 138 and 139: EAKIN, H. 2010. What is Vulnerable?
Page 140 and 141: GODFRAY, H. C. J., BEDDINGTON, J. R
Page 142 and 143: INGRAM, J. S. I. & FERNANDES, E. C.
Page 144 and 145: LYUTSE, S. 2010. The One Billion To
Page 146 and 147: RAYNER, S. & MALONE, E. L. 1998. Hu
Page 148 and 149: UNDP 2006. The 2006 Human Developme
Page 150 and 151: activities “from plough to plate
Page 152 and 153: contribution to the science agenda:
Page 154 and 155: urgently needed, and - given the gr
Page 156 and 157: GECAFS plannenmakerij stelde vast d
Page 158 and 159: ieder hun eigen groep van betrokken
Page 162: Curriculum VitaeFollowing a BSc in
show all

From Food Production to Food Security - Global Environmental ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?