12.07.2015 Views

MIL-HDBK-502 - Barringer and Associates, Inc.

MIL-HDBK-502 - Barringer and Associates, Inc.

MIL-HDBK-502 - Barringer and Associates, Inc.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>MIL</strong>-<strong>HDBK</strong>-<strong>502</strong>: ACQUISITIONALOGISTICSbe adequately defined in Section B <strong>and</strong> the specification. SOWs or SOOsare usually prepared using the Work Breakdown Structure described in<strong>MIL</strong>-<strong>HDBK</strong>-881. Prior to acquisition reform, a SOW was written in a veryprescriptive, task-oriented manner. Now under acquisition reform, thephilosophy is for a SOW to be stated in performance terms (objectives orrequirements) as much as possible. Other approaches are also beingconsidered in upper levels within the Office of the Secretary of Defense.These include issuing government-developed draft SOWs for contractorsto respond to, or just providing a system specification or OperationalRequirements Document without a SOW being utilized at all. Whateverapproaches are deemed appropriate, it is apparent that the old way ofwriting SOWs will no longer suffice.Statement of WorkThe statement of work is the contractual vehicle for expressing whatperformance objectives or requirements a contractor must meet <strong>and</strong> the workthe contractor is to perform. It is the keystone of the request for proposal(RFP), the offerors' proposals, <strong>and</strong> the resulting contract. The statement ofwork may be incorporated directly into Section C or it may be included as anattachment to the contract <strong>and</strong> listed in Section J.The clarity of the statement of work has a direct effect on efficient contractadministration because it defines the scope of work to be performed.Ambiguous statements of work, or statements of work with unduly restrictiverequirements, result in unsatisfactory performance, delays, disputes, <strong>and</strong> highercosts.During proposal evaluation <strong>and</strong> source selection, the statement of work playsa significant role. Failure to adequately describe the scope of work often resultsin needless delays <strong>and</strong> extra administration effort during the source selectionprocess. The ability to clearly define the desired performance objectives orrequirements of the end product in a clear, precise manner often affects thetype of contract which will be selected. A well-defined product can often beacquired with a fixed-price contract; a product that cannot be defined preciselyis usually acquired using a cost reimbursement contract.After contract award, the statement of work becomes the st<strong>and</strong>ard formeasuring contractor performance. As the effort progresses, both thegovernment <strong>and</strong> the contractor constantly refer to the statement of work todetermine their respective rights <strong>and</strong> obligations with regard to the contract.When a question arises concerning an apparent change in a performancerequirement or an increase in the scope of work to be performed, the statementof work is the baseline document that must be used to resolve the issue.Language in the statement of work that defines the limits of the contractor'seffort is of critical importance. If the limits are poorly established, it is difficult8-8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!