Footnote 8

More documents

Recommendations

Info

COUNT 28B (Recovery of Emission Credits for the Benefit of the Estates)..................................................352COUNT 28C (Transfer of Lien to the Estate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352COUNT 29(Disallowance of Claims Under Bankruptcy Code Section502(d)) ............................................352D. COUNTS 30 - 36 (Against BT/Deutsche Bank Defendants) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 353COUNT 30(Avoidance of Valhalla Setoff as a Postpetition Transaction)..................................................353COUNT 31 (Recovery of Avoided Postpetition Transfers) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357COUNT 32COUNT 33COUNT 34COUNT 35COUNT 36(Avoidance of the BT/Deutsche Bank Preferential Transfers)..................................................357(Avoidance of the BT/Deutsche Bank 548 Transfers asFraudulent Transfers).................................359(Avoidance of the BT/Deutsche Bank 544 Transfers UnderSection 544 of the Bankruptcy Code and Applicable StateFraudulent Conveyance or Fraudulent Transfer Law) . . . . . . . . 361(Recovery of the BT/Deutsche Bank Preferential Transfers,the BT/Deutsche Bank 548 Transfers, and the BT/DeutscheBank 544 Transfers)..................................366(Disallowance of Claims Under Bankruptcy Code Section502(d)) ............................................367E. COUNTS 37 - 41 (Against CIBC Defendants) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367COUNT 37 (Avoidance of the CIBC Preferential Transfers) . . . . . . . . . . . . 367COUNT 38COUNT 39(Avoidance of the CIBC 548 Transfers as FraudulentTransfers) ..........................................368(Avoidance of the CIBC 544 Transfers Under Section 544 ofthe Bankruptcy Code and Applicable State FraudulentConveyance or Fraudulent Transfer Law) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 368COUNT 40 (Recovery of the CIBC 544 Transfers) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373COUNT 41(Disallowance of Claims Under Bankruptcy Code Section502(d)) ............................................373604041v1/007457-x-
F. COUNTS 42 - 44 (Against Merrill Lynch Defendants) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373COUNT 42(Avoidance of the Merrill Lynch 544 Transfers Under Section544 of the Bankruptcy Code and Applicable State FraudulentConveyance or Fraudulent Transfer Law) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373COUNT 43 (Recovery of the Merrill Lynch 544 Transfers) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375COUNT 44(Disallowance of Claims Under Bankruptcy Code Section502(d)) ............................................375G. COUNTS 45 - 49 (Against CSFB Defendants) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 376COUNT 45 (Avoidance of the CSFB Preferential Transfers) . . . . . . . . . . . . 376COUNT 46COUNT 47(Avoidance of the CSFB 548 Transfers as FraudulentTransfers) ..........................................377(Avoidance of the CSFB 544 Transfers Under Section 544 ofthe Bankruptcy Code and Applicable State FraudulentConveyance or Fraudulent Transfer Law) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 379COUNT 47A (Unjust Enrichment) .................................381COUNT 47B (Turnover of Property of the Estate) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 383COUNT 48 (Recovery of the CSFB Preferential Transfers, the CSFB 548Transfers and the CSFB 544 Transfers) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 384COUNT 49(Disallowance of Claims Under Bankruptcy Code Section502(d)) ............................................384H. COUNTS 50 - 54 (Against Toronto Dominion Defendants) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 385COUNT 50 (Avoidance of the Toronto Dominion Preferential Transfers . . 385COUNT 51COUNT 52COUNT 53(Avoidance of the Toronto Dominion 548 Transfers asFraudulent Transfers).................................386(Avoidance of the Toronto Dominion 544 Transfers UnderSection 544 of the Bankruptcy Code and Applicable StateFraudulent Conveyance or Fraudulent Transfer Law) . . . . . . . . 389(Recovery of Avoided Transfers Related to the TorontoDominion Preferential Transfers, the Toronto Dominion 544Transfers and the Toronto Dominion 544 Transfers) . . . . . . . . 393604041v1/007457-xi-
Page 1 and 2: ENRON CORP., et al.Reorganized Debt
Page 3 and 4: DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANYDELAWARE
Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTSPageI. NATURE OF T
Page 7 and 8: d. The Insiders engaged in a scheme
Page 9 and 10: (d) Barclays’ improper appropriat
Page 11 and 12: (a) LJM1 and the Rhythms Hedging tr
Page 13: COUNT 17COUNT 18(Avoidance of the C
Page 17 and 18: COUNT 67(Recovery of the Challenged
Page 19 and 20: Steele ............................
Page 21 and 22: REORGANIZED DEBTORS’ FOURTH AMEND
Page 23 and 24: 3. A second large group of transact
Page 25 and 26: these partnerships secret from Enro
Page 27 and 28: approved the employment of Stephen
Page 29 and 30: managed by a new board of directors
Page 31 and 32: 17. Plaintiff and the affiliated en
Page 33 and 34: headquarters at 270 Park Avenue, 35
Page 35 and 36: Germany. Deutsche Bank AG does busi
Page 37 and 38: 55. Defendant Deutsche Bank, S.A. i
Page 39 and 40: 67. Defendant Merrill Lynch Capital
Page 41 and 42: successor, agent, co-conspirator, c
Page 43 and 44: 10. The RBC Defendants92. Defendant
Page 45 and 46: 107. Not Used.108. Defendant Sphinx
Page 47 and 48: 118. Defendant Enron Sterling Credi
Page 49 and 50: 126A. Each of FleetBoston Financial
Page 51 and 52: eports. In these reports and their
Page 53 and 54: Fastow was fired in late 2001 and E
Page 55 and 56: c. Fastow and Kopper orchestrated (
Page 57 and 58: immediately. As part of his plea ag
Page 59 and 60: 3. How The Scheme Workeda. Enron em
Page 61 and 62: could not trade with others in the
Page 63 and 64: • Funds flow from operations, def
Page 65 and 66:
d. The Insiders engaged in a scheme
Page 67 and 68:
178. Self-interested partnerships -
Page 69 and 70:
specifically, when the relevant tra
Page 71 and 72:
eported the repayment obligation as
Page 73 and 74:
nature of these transactions and/or
Page 75 and 76:
2governs the securitization of fina
Page 77 and 78:
unless independent third parties ma
Page 79 and 80:
211. An actual example: On December
Page 81 and 82:
transactions. The Insiders took the
Page 83 and 84:
LJM2. In doing so, the Insiders rec
Page 85 and 86:
LJM2 (technically, LJM Co-Investmen
Page 87 and 88:
235. From the beginning, Fastow kne
Page 89 and 90:
244. The Southampton transaction ul
Page 91 and 92:
249. By the end of December 1999, f
Page 93 and 94:
threats of no future business or pr
Page 95 and 96:
Fastow’s participation in the LJM
Page 97 and 98:
262. Citigroup’s participation in
Page 99 and 100:
Id. at B-1 (emphasis added).266. Wi
Page 101 and 102:
period, Citigroup completed over 60
Page 103 and 104:
one another and to cause one anothe
Page 105 and 106:
Yosemite IV USD 5/24/01 $775.1 mill
Page 107 and 108:
linked promissory notes to institut
Page 109 and 110:
of which also involved Enron) and o
Page 111 and 112:
and Andersen may have worked togeth
Page 113 and 114:
monetizations became less attractiv
Page 115 and 116:
(3) The minority interest transacti
Page 117 and 118:
CITI-B00393281 (quoted in Exam. III
Page 119 and 120:
issued Irrevocable Letter of Credit
Page 121 and 122:
Citigroup’s own internal descript
Page 123 and 124:
alance sheet. Through Sundance Indu
Page 125 and 126:
[T]he Bacchus transaction was steep
Page 127 and 128:
327. Before the Bacchus transaction
Page 129 and 130:
tier 1 banks.” CITI-SPSI 0036296.
Page 131 and 132:
prepays, two FAS 140s, and one tax
Page 133 and 134:
(1) Chase’s relationship with Enr
Page 135 and 136:
using a proprietary technology. It
Page 137 and 138:
discussion on this about 6 weeks ag
Page 139 and 140:
357. In its complaint against Chase
Page 141 and 142:
it was “purchasing the Natural Ga
Page 143 and 144:
his July 28, 2003 letter to Manhatt
Page 145 and 146:
commodity to JP Morgan Chase) under
Page 147 and 148:
378D. In late November 2001, JPMC d
Page 149 and 150:
Garden State Paper Company, (ii)
Page 151 and 152:
ankruptcy. By the late 1990s, Barcl
Page 153 and 154:
398. The Insiders used Nikita to mo
Page 155 and 156:
agreement but an instrument that wo
Page 157 and 158:
408J. On or about December 7, 2000,
Page 159 and 160:
For example, Colonnade had not been
Page 161 and 162:
420. Upon information and belief, t
Page 163 and 164:
429. On or about October 30, 2001,
Page 165 and 166:
(c)Three million Four Hundred Fifty
Page 167 and 168:
447. Each of the various individual
Page 169 and 170:
that effectively provided Barclays
Page 171 and 172:
464. The Nixon prepay allowed Enron
Page 173 and 174:
All three (Deutsche Bank AG, Banker
Page 175 and 176:
financial statements improperly rep
Page 177 and 178:
customer to report the transaction
Page 179 and 180:
Insiders intended to accomplish the
Page 181 and 182:
497. As part of the transaction, BT
Page 183 and 184:
(3) BT/Deutsche Bank limited its En
Page 185 and 186:
disclosed, “Enron could not have
Page 187 and 188:
511. CIBC knew that in every FAS 14
Page 189 and 190:
understanding of the Insiders’ go
Page 191 and 192:
523. Again, however, before CIBC ag
Page 193 and 194:
able to manipulate and misstate Enr
Page 195 and 196:
achieve accounting objectives, incl
Page 197 and 198:
Complaint in SEC v. Merrill Lynch,
Page 199 and 200:
539. From 1997 through 2001, Merril
Page 201 and 202:
transaction. He also wondered where
Page 203 and 204:
550. Merrill Lynch knew that the 19
Page 205 and 206:
Insiders’ schemes, including its
Page 207 and 208:
(2) LJM1 and LJM2.561. As discussed
Page 209 and 210:
566. CSFB therefore knew the hedge
Page 211 and 212:
proceeds resulting from those share
Page 213 and 214:
(3) The Prepaid Oil Swaps.577. In D
Page 215 and 216:
(4) FAS 140 transactions.(a)Nile583
Page 217 and 218:
or some of the equity investment. C
Page 219 and 220:
equity investment was not at risk.
Page 221 and 222:
App. L. at 22-23 n.81). In his resp
Page 223 and 224:
CSFB colleague two days before givi
Page 225 and 226:
Dominion’s return on Enron-relate
Page 227 and 228:
IV, App. G at 7 & n.23. In addition
Page 229 and 230:
Payments went in a complete circle
Page 231 and 232:
Dominion prepays - as cash flow fro
Page 233 and 234:
619. Toronto Dominion also knew it
Page 235 and 236:
that, as a limited partner in LJM1,
Page 237 and 238:
etween 1997 and 2001, and, as of No
Page 239 and 240:
at 45. In addition to the direct an
Page 241 and 242:
these restrictions, a 39% discount
Page 243 and 244:
een held in LJM1, and RBS’s total
Page 245 and 246:
substantially assisted the Insiders
Page 247 and 248:
RBS compromised by letting the Insi
Page 249 and 250:
easons.” RBS 3141116 (quoted in E
Page 251 and 252:
manipulation” in Enron’s financ
Page 253 and 254:
saw their experiences with Enron-re
Page 255 and 256:
Exam. at 102-03. RBC knew the Insid
Page 257 and 258:
thing. However, we cannot in the do
Page 259 and 260:
earn higher fees, then selling the
Page 261 and 262:
investment that was not at risk and
Page 263 and 264:
transactions in which Merrill Lynch
Page 265 and 266:
TransferorObligorInitialTransferee
Page 267 and 268:
716. On or within one year before t
Page 269 and 270:
717. The transfers identified in th
Page 271 and 272:
TransferorObligorInitial Transferee
Page 273 and 274:
TransferorEnron orENAEnronEnronEnro
Page 275 and 276:
TransferorEnron orENAEnron orENAEnr
Page 277 and 278:
742. By reason of the foregoing fac
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281 and 282:
TransferorEnron or ENAor ENGMEnron
Page 283 and 284:
Page 285 and 286:
765. Upon information and belief, w
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
789. Each of the Chase Preferential
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
796. Although certain of the Chase
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
Page 313 and 314:
Page 315 and 316:
Page 317 and 318:
transfers; were engaged in business
Page 319 and 320:
823. The payments characterized as
Page 321 and 322:
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
Page 329 and 330:
Page 331 and 332:
Page 333 and 334:
840. The Chase 548 Purported Margin
Page 335 and 336:
Page 337 and 338:
Page 339 and 340:
Page 341 and 342:
Page 343 and 344:
Page 345 and 346:
Page 347 and 348:
transactions (“Prepay Obligations
Page 349 and 350:
COUNT 15(Avoidance of the Chase Pre
Page 351 and 352:
871. Enron and/or ENA received less
Page 353 and 354:
Code, those transfers are pled alte
Page 355 and 356:
Page 357 and 358:
902. The Barclays Preferential Tran
Page 359 and 360:
of the security interest that is th
Page 361 and 362:
Page 363 and 364:
921. To the extent that any of the
Page 365 and 366:
Barclays Bank on or about November
Page 367 and 368:
COUNT 25(Avoidance of Unauthorized
Page 369 and 370:
940L. By the Barclays Improper Appr
Page 371 and 372:
949. Pursuant to section 553(b) of
Page 373 and 374:
Page 375 and 376:
the parties could, under certain co
Page 377 and 378:
Page 379 and 380:
y reference.COUNT 33(Avoidance of t
Page 381 and 382:
996. Each of the BT/Deutsche Bank 5
Page 383 and 384:
Transferor Obligor TransfereeEnron
Page 385 and 386:
Transferor Obligor TransfereeEnron
Page 387 and 388:
COUNT 36(Disallowance of Claims Und
Page 389 and 390:
TransferorEnron orENA or ACFIObligo
Page 391 and 392:
TransferorObligorInitialTransfereeo
Page 393 and 394:
COUNT 40(Recovery of the CIBC 544 T
Page 395 and 396:
elieved that they would incur, debt
Page 397 and 398:
1068. The CSFB Preferential Transfe
Page 399 and 400:
1082. Each of the CSFB 548 Transfer
Page 401 and 402:
1095. Each of the CSFB 544 Transfer
Page 403 and 404:
and (b) that CSFB, Pyramid I and/or
Page 405 and 406:
H. COUNTS 50 - 54(Against Toronto D
Page 407 and 408:
Transferor ObligorInitialTransferee
Page 409 and 410:
COUNT 52(Avoidance of the Toronto D
Page 411 and 412:
TransferorEnron or ENAEnron or ENAE
Page 413 and 414:
1135. Upon and information and beli
Page 415 and 416:
TransferorObligorInitialTransferee
Page 417 and 418:
1167. The transfers identified in t
Page 419 and 420:
J. COUNTS 60 - 64(Against RBC Defen
Page 421 and 422:
Page 423 and 424:
1227. The Challenged Transaction Ob
Page 425 and 426:
1232. The Challenged Transaction Ob
Page 427 and 428:
Page 429 and 430:
1242. The Intentional Fraudulent Tr
Page 431 and 432:
1250. The Intentional Fraudulent Co
Page 433 and 434:
Plaintiff’s creditors and conferr
Page 435 and 436:
1265. Plaintiff cannot at this time
Page 437 and 438:
Transferor Defendant continued to h
Page 439 and 440:
communications with investors the I
Page 441 and 442:
1273. As a direct and proximate res
Page 443 and 444:
information about the company’s c
Page 445 and 446:
1287. Insider Causey did not disclo
Page 447 and 448:
1299. Insider Fastow did not disclo
Page 449 and 450:
1310. Insiders Fastow and McMahon d
Page 451 and 452:
June 20011322. The Insiders did not
Page 453 and 454:
Committee meeting on December 13, 1
Page 455 and 456:
Page 457 and 458:
Chase IX Prepay1356. The Insiders d
Page 459 and 460:
Chase XI Prepay1367. The Insiders d
Page 461 and 462:
meetings in and around the time of
Page 463 and 464:
transaction (including a meeting on
Page 465 and 466:
Page 467 and 468:
Page 469 and 470:
despite the fact that the transacti
Page 471 and 472:
Page 473 and 474:
Page 475 and 476:
Page 477 and 478:
the time of the transaction (includ
Page 479 and 480:
1478. The Insiders did not disclose
Page 481 and 482:
time of the transaction (including
Page 483 and 484:
Committee meeting, at the August 1,
Page 485 and 486:
1520. Insider McMahon did not discl
Page 487 and 488:
1999, or the verbal insurances they
Page 489 and 490:
(3) employing transactions with the
Page 491 and 492:
(b)On or about September 17, 1999,
Page 493 and 494:
(a)On or about November 24, 2000, S
Page 495 and 496:
JP Morgan Chase1546. In connection
Page 497 and 498:
1549. In connection with the Chase
Page 499 and 500:
(a)On or about September 13, 2001,
Page 501 and 502:
(a)On or about September 20, 2001,
Page 503 and 504:
(e)In order to fraudulently meet Ar
Page 505 and 506:
(b)On or about March 27, 1997, Thom
Page 507 and 508:
(c)On or about December 29, 1998, R
Page 509 and 510:
(a)On or about December 15, 1998, S
Page 511 and 512:
1578. In connection with the Specte
Page 513 and 514:
(o)On or about March 2, 2001, Rober
Page 515 and 516:
(c)On or about December 8, 2000, Ja
Page 517 and 518:
(a)On or about December 12, 1998, V
Page 519 and 520:
(c)On or about December 13, 1999, D
Page 521 and 522:
(f)On or about November 12, 1999, D
Page 523 and 524:
(i)On or about March 1, 2001, Goss
Page 525 and 526:
1596. Enron’s injuries as describ
Page 527 and 528:
that were financially involved with
Page 529 and 530:
(b) that CSFB, Pyramid I and/or Sph
Page 531:
ENRON CORP., et al.,Reorganized Deb
show all

Footnote 8

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?