12.07.2015 Views

2012-13 Government Mid-year Financial Projections Statement

2012-13 Government Mid-year Financial Projections Statement

2012-13 Government Mid-year Financial Projections Statement

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>2012</strong>-<strong>13</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Mid</strong>-<strong>year</strong> <strong>Financial</strong> <strong>Projections</strong> <strong>Statement</strong>In addition, the Review reports a longer run aspiration of an equal per capita distributionof GST grants, which would substantially improve Western Australia’s funding share(beyond the current forward estimates period).The Review contains additional findings and recommendations on the interaction betweenState mining royalties (on iron ore and coal) and the Commonwealth’s Minerals ResourceRent Tax (MRRT), including a ‘proposal’ to further penalise States (through the GSTdistribution process) that increase royalties. This poses another downside risk to theState’s revenues (also, see below in relation to infrastructure funding).Even on a ‘no methodology change’ basis, the accuracy of GST relativity projections isaffected by, inter alia, the complexity of the CGC’s methods, uncertainty surroundingprojected own-source revenue growth in Western Australia and other States, and theCGC’s response to new issues (e.g. data availability and suitability) that emerge overtime.Commonwealth <strong>Government</strong> Payments for Specific PurposesEstimated payments for specific purposes total $4,898 million in <strong>2012</strong>-<strong>13</strong>. This includesNational Specific Purpose Payments, National Partnership payments, National HealthReform funding and payments to Western Australia from Commonwealth own-purposeexpenses.The forward estimates of payments for specific purposes, and associated impacts on Statespending, also have a significant margin of uncertainty, reflecting:the potential for Commonwealth policy changes, including possible new NationalPartnerships and greater intrusion by the Commonwealth into the delivery of Stateservices;that some National Partnership payments are contingent on the State’s performanceand may require the State to match Commonwealth funding;that National Partnership agreements continue to impose inflexible input controls andonerous reporting requirements, which may limit the State’s autonomy and ability tooptimise the management of resources and improve service outcomes;in some cases, the need for the States to compete for national pools of funding, and toprovide matching funding;the uncertainty over whether National Partnership agreements expiring during theforward estimates will be renewed or replaced. It is estimated that, for NationalPartnership agreements that expire during the forward estimates period, comparedwith <strong>2012</strong>-<strong>13</strong> Western Australia will receive around $100 million less in 20<strong>13</strong>-14,around $800 million less in 2014-15 and around $900 million less annually thereafter.The extent to which these losses are offset by new or continued National Partnershipagreements remains uncertain at this time; andparameter uncertainties (such as timing and indexation for inflation and wagesgrowth).34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!