03.12.2012 Views

A Multidisciplinary Research Journal - Devanga Arts College

A Multidisciplinary Research Journal - Devanga Arts College

A Multidisciplinary Research Journal - Devanga Arts College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

than chop” (BH 225-26). When Rennie hears of chopping women, she thinks of “cook books”<br />

(BH 216) and meat.<br />

Male aggression and female passivity is suggested by Atwood’s epigraph to Bodily<br />

Harm, which is a quotation from John Berger’s Ways of Seeing. The epigraph states that a<br />

man’s presence suggests what he is capable of doing to others, whereas a woman’s presence<br />

suggests what can and cannot be done to her. Thus, in a patriarchal sexist society, man occupies<br />

the subject position and woman the object position. Jocasta, a feminist activist, directs Rennie’s<br />

thoughts towards taking up women’s issues through her writings. Jocasta says: “it would be a<br />

great idea if all the men were changed into women and all the women were changed into men for<br />

a week. Then they would each know to treat the other ones when they got changed back […]”<br />

(BH 156). Rennie takes up writing as a serious occupation. She works for ‘Pandora’, a woman<br />

oriented magazine and ‘Visor’ – a male oriented magazine which helps her to analyse the male<br />

and female points of view. Rennie writes an article entitled “Burned out”, which discusses the<br />

failure of women’s movement.<br />

Bodily Harm can be considered to be an anti- pornography treatise as Atwood exposes<br />

the perverse and debased notions of sex, propagated thorough pornographic representations. In<br />

writing this novel, Atwood seems to have been influenced by some anti-pornography feminist<br />

works like Andrea Dworkin’s Pornography: Men possessing Women (1979), Susan griffin’s<br />

Pornography and Silence: Culture’s revenge against nature (1981) and Laura lederer’s collection<br />

of essays entitled ‘Take back the night: Women on Pornography (1980). Rennie is commissioned<br />

to write about pornography as an art form from a woman’s angle, for Visor. The editor wants to<br />

publish this article, not for raising the social consciousness against it, but to provide “a sort of<br />

fun” (BH 207). This takes Rennie to the studio of a male-porn artist named Frank who justifies<br />

his craft saying that, “Art is for contemplation, what art does is, it takes what society deals out<br />

and makes it visible” (BH 208). She sees life sized mannequin tables and chairs depicting<br />

women in demeaning postures: “One of the chairs was a woman on her knees, her back arched,<br />

her wrists tied to her thighs. The ropes and arms were the arms of the chair, her bum was the<br />

seat”. (BH 209)<br />

Rennies’ assignment takes her to Toronto policemen’s pornography museum where she<br />

visualizes the male fantasies of domination over women. She sees the film clips of a woman<br />

copulating with a dog, a woman with a pig, a woman with a donkey, woman being strangled or

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!