- Page 1 and 2: 3PrefaceThe research presented in t
- Page 3 and 4: 5Table of contentsPART 1 ..........
- Page 5: 7Summary/abstractThe work reported
- Page 9 and 10: 11main concerns. The implementation
- Page 12 and 13: 14Similarly it can be difficult to
- Page 14 and 15: 16project management and the comple
- Page 16 and 17: 18Norway. 4 To my knowledge, this i
- Page 18 and 19: 20also are important sources. 6 Oth
- Page 20 and 21: 22variety of sources. Furthermore,
- Page 22 and 23: 24ends with the final decision to a
- Page 24 and 25: set up to achieve a specified goal
- Page 26 and 27: 28of the reduction lists is to keep
- Page 28 and 29: 30In paper 10, Magnussen (2009b) pr
- Page 30 and 31: 32Stage 2: Data structuring and ref
- Page 32 and 33: 34agreements on the fractional dist
- Page 34 and 35: 36Overall issues with sub-categorie
- Page 36 and 37: experience, has been collected and
- Page 38 and 39: 40consultants prior to the decision
- Page 40 and 41: 42ReferencesBerg, Peder, Knut Ander
- Page 42 and 43: 44Olsson, Nils O. E., and Ole M. Ma
- Page 44 and 45: 46———. 2002. St.prp. nr. 1 (2
- Page 46 and 47: Part 2 Research papers48
- Page 48 and 49: EURAM 2005 Responsible Management i
- Page 50 and 51: elsewhere. Another issue is of cour
- Page 52 and 53: these adjustments make budgets more
- Page 54 and 55: This includes performing a complete
- Page 56 and 57:
The key performance measures used i
- Page 58 and 59:
establish relevant objectives. Rele
- Page 60 and 61:
Paper 2Magnussen, Ole M., and Nils
- Page 62 and 63:
282 O.M. Magnussen, N.O.E. Olsson /
- Page 64 and 65:
284 O.M. Magnussen, N.O.E. Olsson /
- Page 66 and 67:
286 O.M. Magnussen, N.O.E. Olsson /
- Page 68 and 69:
288 O.M. Magnussen, N.O.E. Olsson /
- Page 70 and 71:
Paper accepted for publication byTh
- Page 72 and 73:
growing understanding of the need t
- Page 74 and 75:
future outcomes. In practice, it is
- Page 76 and 77:
static view of projects. A project
- Page 78 and 79:
scope of the conceptual development
- Page 80 and 81:
themselves, since it is assumed to
- Page 82 and 83:
Another aspect of the network appro
- Page 84 and 85:
of project management has to change
- Page 86 and 87:
OUTLINING THE MODEL (THAT WILL BE U
- Page 88 and 89:
course be described in more detail
- Page 90 and 91:
execute the building project was ta
- Page 92 and 93:
shaded. The most important relation
- Page 94 and 95:
of government (identified as the ac
- Page 96 and 97:
AEA - The focal projectB - End user
- Page 98 and 99:
Expertise ontechnicalissuesAEExpert
- Page 100 and 101:
The observation here is interesting
- Page 102 and 103:
usefulness. Instead of analysing th
- Page 104 and 105:
Lundin, Rolf A., and Anders Söderh
- Page 106 and 107:
Paper 4Olsson, Nils O. E., and Ole
- Page 108 and 109:
Reproduced with permission of the c
- Page 110 and 111:
Reproduced with permission of the c
- Page 112 and 113:
Reproduced with permission of the c
- Page 114 and 115:
Reproduced with permission of the c
- Page 125 and 126:
Paper 6Klakegg, Ole Jonny, Terry Wi
- Page 127 and 128:
PAPERSGovernance Frameworks for Pub
- Page 129 and 130:
PAPERSGovernance Frameworks for Pub
- Page 131 and 132:
PAPERSGovernance Frameworks for Pub
- Page 133 and 134:
PAPERSGovernance Frameworks for Pub
- Page 135 and 136:
PAPERSGovernance Frameworks for Pub
- Page 137 and 138:
PAPERSGovernance Frameworks for Pub
- Page 139 and 140:
PAPERSGovernance Frameworks for Pub
- Page 141 and 142:
PAPERSGovernance Frameworks for Pub
- Page 143 and 144:
Practical implications of governanc
- Page 145 and 146:
(within MoD but independent of the
- Page 147 and 148:
cut them off from a prime source of
- Page 149 and 150:
help Statsbygg”. However, there s
- Page 151 and 152:
Paper 8Williams, Terry, Ole Jonny K
- Page 153 and 154:
ARTICLE IN PRESS2 T. Williams et al
- Page 155 and 156:
ARTICLE IN PRESS4 T. Williams et al
- Page 157 and 158:
ARTICLE IN PRESS6 T. Williams et al
- Page 159 and 160:
ARTICLE IN PRESS8 T. Williams et al
- Page 161 and 162:
ARTICLE IN PRESS10 T. Williams et a
- Page 163 and 164:
Paper 9Magnussen, Ole M. 2009. Cost
- Page 165 and 166:
Cost development in quality-assured
- Page 167 and 168:
As reported by Berg, Stene Fon, Kva
- Page 169 and 170:
eports from quality assurers, gover
- Page 171 and 172:
Empirical resultsAs stated above, t
- Page 173 and 174:
of the projects, reliable data for
- Page 175 and 176:
level). Consequently, some of the o
- Page 177 and 178:
The results observed in the 10 comp
- Page 179 and 180:
ReferencesBerg, Peder, Erik A. Sten
- Page 181 and 182:
Paper submitted to the Internationa
- Page 183 and 184:
Ministry of Finance responded to th
- Page 185 and 186:
as project owner. It’s also worth
- Page 187 and 188:
6. What might explain the observed
- Page 189 and 190:
cost estimation method category con
- Page 191 and 192:
contextual information shows the co
- Page 193:
Paper 11Klakegg, Ole Jonny, Terry W