IntroductionIt is important to ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>sight <strong>in</strong>to the <strong>physical</strong> activity levels of persons <strong>with</strong> profound <strong>in</strong>tellectual,visual, and severe motor disabilities (profound <strong>in</strong>tellectual and multiple disabilities, PIMD).<strong>Persons</strong> <strong>with</strong> PIMD risk low levels of <strong>physical</strong> activity [1, 2] and the associated negative effectson health. Physical activity improves both mental health, <strong>physical</strong> health, <strong>physical</strong> <strong>fitness</strong> [3], andparticipation <strong>in</strong> daily life [4]. Physical activity is def<strong>in</strong>ed as any bodily movement produced byskeletal muscles that results <strong>in</strong> energy expenditure [5]. However, for a substantial ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>physical</strong><strong>fitness</strong>, the ACSM guidel<strong>in</strong>es state that <strong>physical</strong> activity has to be performed 5 days a week for atleast 30 m<strong>in</strong>utes a day <strong>with</strong> an <strong>in</strong>tensity of more than 55 % of the heart rate reserve [6].<strong>Persons</strong> <strong>with</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellectual disabilities are often not sufficiently active to achieve benefits<strong>in</strong> health or improve <strong>fitness</strong> levels [2, 7, 8]. Additionally, <strong>physical</strong> <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>in</strong> persons <strong>with</strong> a visualdisability is poorer than <strong>in</strong> persons <strong>with</strong>out disabilities [9, 10, 11], and persons <strong>with</strong> both severe<strong>in</strong>tellectual and visual disabilities have a high chance of experienc<strong>in</strong>g a variety of limitations <strong>in</strong>daily function<strong>in</strong>g such as <strong>in</strong>activity, <strong>in</strong>secure movement and little <strong>in</strong>itiative [12]. However, research<strong>in</strong>to the <strong>physical</strong> activity levels <strong>in</strong> persons <strong>with</strong> PIMD is limited and knowledge on the topic is scarce.Due to severe multiple disabilities, <strong>physical</strong> activity levels of persons <strong>with</strong> PIMD are difficultto reliably quantify [13]. These persons often also suffer from sensory <strong>in</strong>tegration problems [14],and <strong>in</strong>adequacies <strong>in</strong> perception and motor-reproduction [15, 16]. Furthermore, co-morbidity,such as cerebral palsy, is more frequent <strong>in</strong> those <strong>with</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellectual disabilities than <strong>in</strong> the generalpopulation [17]. As a result, persons <strong>with</strong> PIMD have generally very limited mobility, use awheelchair [18], and have a Gross Motor Function Classification System level IV and V (GMFCS)[19]. Consequently, normal tests, such as the usage of walk<strong>in</strong>g, are not applicable for persons<strong>with</strong> PIMD [13]. Moreover, the presumed low levels of activity <strong>in</strong> persons <strong>with</strong> such profounddisabilities are often not accurately presented by relatively <strong>in</strong>sensitive measurement devices, likeactivity monitors [13]. In addition, there are no exist<strong>in</strong>g algorithms for predict<strong>in</strong>g activity energyexpenditure of persons <strong>with</strong> PIMD.Physical activity studies often use a comb<strong>in</strong>ation of assessment methods [20, 21] <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gheart rate monitor<strong>in</strong>g, which is an objective method [22], comb<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>with</strong> direct observation,which is a criterion method [22]. Heart rate monitor<strong>in</strong>g may be used as an <strong>in</strong>dicator of activitylevels when assum<strong>in</strong>g a relationship between activity <strong>in</strong>tensity and heart rate [23, 24]. Heart ratemonitor<strong>in</strong>g appears to be sufficiently valid to use <strong>in</strong> creat<strong>in</strong>g broad <strong>physical</strong> activity categories(e.g. highly active, somewhat active, sedentary) [25]. As stated before, only heart rates of morethan 55% of the heart rate reserve may ga<strong>in</strong> profit for <strong>physical</strong> <strong>fitness</strong>, if obta<strong>in</strong>ed dur<strong>in</strong>g 5 days<strong>in</strong> a week [6]. Thus, heart rate monitor<strong>in</strong>g may tell us if we can actually <strong>in</strong>crease the persons’<strong>fitness</strong>.However, the correct method of dat<strong>in</strong>g heart rate patterns of <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>with</strong> PIMD aswell as the correlation between heart rate monitor<strong>in</strong>g and activity levels for this specific grouphave so far not been subject to research. What is more, also the <strong>in</strong>fluence of covariates such asgender and age on the heart rate patterns of <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>with</strong> PIMD is unknown. For persons <strong>with</strong>and <strong>with</strong>out disabilities, <strong>physical</strong> activity is gender related [18]. Heart rate is related to age [26],gender and activity [27]. As persons <strong>with</strong> PIMD often suffer from co-morbidity such as motordisability, spasticity and sensory disabilities, it seems useful to exam<strong>in</strong>e the <strong>in</strong>fluence of thesecovariates on heart rate height as well.Chapter 8 | 123
Furthermore, practical experience learns that as a consequence of co-morbidity, the skillsof persons <strong>with</strong> PIMD vary greatly. Moreover, Vlaskamp et al. [28] found days <strong>in</strong> the PIMD activitycentres to be highly structured, <strong>with</strong> each activity tak<strong>in</strong>g place at the same time and day. Thesef<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs suggest the possibility of a relation between heart rate patterns and subgroups plus timeof day.The purpose of this study, therefore, was fourfold: firstly, to determ<strong>in</strong>e the activity levels ofpersons <strong>with</strong> PIMD based on heart rate patterns when compared to ACSM guidel<strong>in</strong>es of healthy<strong>physical</strong> activity; secondly, to analyze heart rate patterns accord<strong>in</strong>g to group differences, days,time of day and to establish adherent classification <strong>in</strong> heart rate height and patterns; thirdly, todeterm<strong>in</strong>e the relation between heart rate patterns and observed level of activity <strong>in</strong> persons <strong>with</strong>PIMD; and, fourthly, to exam<strong>in</strong>e the <strong>in</strong>fluence of covariates such as gender, age, and common comorbidity(motor disabilities, spasticity and sensory disabilities) on heart rate patterns.Materials and methodsParticipantsThe target population of our study comprises of persons <strong>with</strong> PIMD, characterized by severeor profound <strong>in</strong>tellectual disability <strong>in</strong>dicated by an <strong>in</strong>telligence quotient under 40 po<strong>in</strong>ts. Theparticipants have a developmental level lower than six years (International Association for theScientific Study of Intellectual Disabilities, IASSID) [29], and are thus severely limited <strong>in</strong> self-care,cont<strong>in</strong>ence, communication, and mobility [30].All participants were recruited from a Dutch residential care facility, which houses 200persons <strong>with</strong> severe or profound <strong>in</strong>tellectual and visual disabilities. The <strong>in</strong>clusion criteria were:presence of severe or profound <strong>in</strong>tellectual disability, visual disability, and motor disability <strong>with</strong>GMFCS level IV or V [19]. For 48 persons, representatives were requested to give a writtenpermission for participation <strong>in</strong> this study, of which 30 were obta<strong>in</strong>ed. Both a physician specialised<strong>in</strong> mental disabilities and a behaviour scholar screened the participants for our exclusion criteria,be<strong>in</strong>g severe psychological problems or somatic diseases def<strong>in</strong>ed as chronic diseases and/ordiseases that do not resolve <strong>in</strong> the short term.Four persons were excluded from the study because they showed one of these problems ordiseases. The exclusion criteria at the time of the measurements were: general illness or fever;tak<strong>in</strong>g antibiotics; worsen<strong>in</strong>g of asthma, epilepsy (recent <strong>in</strong>sult or epileptic fits), fresh wound(s)/bruise(s), or other factors caus<strong>in</strong>g pa<strong>in</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g movement; or stress due to the subject’s behaviorjust before the measurement dates. Two persons were excluded because they presented one ofthese signals. Figure 1 presents the sampl<strong>in</strong>g scheme of persons <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the study.124 | Chapter 8
- Page 2 and 3:
Measuring physical fitnessin person
- Page 4:
Rijksuniversiteit GroningenMeasurin
- Page 10 and 11:
Chapter 1IntroductionChapter 1 | 9
- Page 12 and 13:
overweight [15]. This prevalence is
- Page 14 and 15:
Theoretical framework of the studyI
- Page 16 and 17:
Components of physical fitnessThe a
- Page 18 and 19:
Therefore, a study is put forward w
- Page 20 and 21:
2002;40:436-444.19 Temple VA, Frey
- Page 22 and 23:
Chapter 2Feasibility and reliabilit
- Page 24 and 25:
IntroductionPhysical fitness and he
- Page 26 and 27:
GMFCS was presented to the investig
- Page 28 and 29:
Body weightTo determine the body we
- Page 30 and 31:
Table 1 Results of Wilcoxon rank te
- Page 32 and 33:
Calculation of heightThe mean (SD)
- Page 34 and 35:
DiscussionThe results of our study
- Page 36 and 37:
References1 Bouchard C, Shepard RJ,
- Page 38 and 39:
37 Rimmer J, Kelly LE, Rosentswieg
- Page 40 and 41:
Chapter 3Measuring waist circumfere
- Page 42 and 43:
IntroductionChildren and adults wit
- Page 44 and 45:
participants. These calculations as
- Page 46 and 47:
Data analysisThe data were analyzed
- Page 48:
Table 2. Simple regression analysis
- Page 54 and 55:
Chapter 4Feasibility and reliabilit
- Page 56 and 57:
IntroductionPeople with intellectua
- Page 58 and 59:
Eighty representatives gave permiss
- Page 60 and 61:
3) The measurement procedure: The m
- Page 62 and 63:
and whether motivation influenced t
- Page 64 and 65:
Table 3. Mean peak heart rate achie
- Page 66 and 67:
AcknowledgementsThis research was f
- Page 68 and 69:
21 Hopkins WG, Gaeta H, Thomas AC,
- Page 70 and 71:
Chapter 5Psychometric quality of a
- Page 72 and 73:
IntroductionIntellectual disability
- Page 74 and 75: Exclusion criteria were mental or p
- Page 76 and 77: participant had fulfilled the task.
- Page 78 and 79: Table 2. Descriptive results peak h
- Page 80 and 81: Table 3. Test-retest reliability of
- Page 82 and 83: Table 4. Correlation scored motivat
- Page 84 and 85: preceding GXT results on HR peak. G
- Page 86 and 87: References1 Schalock R, Brown I, Br
- Page 88 and 89: 37 Stanish HI, Temple VA, Frey GC.
- Page 90 and 91: Chapter 6Feasibility and reliabilit
- Page 92 and 93: IntroductionLocomotor skills in peo
- Page 94 and 95: this study was to evaluate the feas
- Page 96 and 97: obtained from the legal representat
- Page 98 and 99: Modified Berg Balance Scale scoresI
- Page 100 and 101: Modified Berg Balance Scale scoresT
- Page 102 and 103: References1 Van Erkelens-Zwets JHJ
- Page 104 and 105: 39 Dorai-Raj S. Binomial Confidence
- Page 106 and 107: Chapter 7Feasibility, test-retest r
- Page 108 and 109: IntroductionPersons with profound i
- Page 110 and 111: DesignThe muscle tone and spasticit
- Page 112 and 113: Interrater reliabilityFirstly, to d
- Page 114 and 115: Table 3. Summary of the statistical
- Page 116 and 117: Table 6. Summary of the statistical
- Page 118 and 119: RecommendationsThe feasibility of c
- Page 120 and 121: 18 Gielen EJJM. Is spasticiteit te
- Page 122 and 123: Chapter 8Heart Rate Pattern as an I
- Page 126 and 127: 48 persons18 persons lacked permiss
- Page 128 and 129: Furthermore, the mean and the range
- Page 130 and 131: Table 3. Day-to-day outline of the
- Page 132 and 133: Relation between heart rate pattern
- Page 134 and 135: patterns in this study we can concl
- Page 136 and 137: References1 Emerson E. Underweight,
- Page 138 and 139: 38 Multilevel Models Project (2004)
- Page 140 and 141: Chapter 9General DiscussionChapter
- Page 142 and 143: on this. To sum up, testing in pers
- Page 144 and 145: for future research it is recommend
- Page 146 and 147: studies. Randomized Controlled Tria
- Page 148 and 149: of these individuals require more?
- Page 150 and 151: 19 Lahtinen U, Rintala P, Malin A.
- Page 152 and 153: SummarySummary | 151
- Page 154 and 155: problems in both locomotor skills a
- Page 156 and 157: subjects are to be applied to perso
- Page 158 and 159: may be an indicator of activity lev
- Page 160 and 161: SamenvattingSamenvatting | 159
- Page 162 and 163: InleidingVoldoende bewegen en fithe
- Page 164 and 165: verstandelijk niveau en bepaalde mo
- Page 166 and 167: Hieruit bleek, dat de motivatie van
- Page 168 and 169: Verder is duidelijk geworden dat me
- Page 170 and 171: DankwoordDankwoord | 169
- Page 172 and 173: De leden van de leescommissie, prof
- Page 174 and 175:
Judith van der Boom, dank je wel vo
- Page 176 and 177:
Dankwoord | 175
- Page 178 and 179:
Curriculum vitaeCurriculum vitae |
- Page 180:
Curriculum vitae | 179