13.07.2015 Views

Measuring physical fitness in Persons with Severe/Profound ...

Measuring physical fitness in Persons with Severe/Profound ...

Measuring physical fitness in Persons with Severe/Profound ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

sup<strong>in</strong>e waist circumference was higher than stand<strong>in</strong>g waist circumference. In zero subjects, therewas no difference. The LOA was 5.34 cm (Figure 2.).difference stand<strong>in</strong>g - sup<strong>in</strong>e measured waistcircumference15,0010,000,005,00-5,0060,00 80,00 100,00 120,00mean stand<strong>in</strong>g - sup<strong>in</strong>e measured waist circumferenceFigure 2. Bland and Altman plot of the differences between stand<strong>in</strong>g and sup<strong>in</strong>e waist circumferencemeasurements. The mean difference is 1.48±5.34 (LOA) (-3.86; 6.82).Predict<strong>in</strong>g stand<strong>in</strong>g waist circumferenceA simple l<strong>in</strong>ear regression analysis was performed on stand<strong>in</strong>g waist circumference, sup<strong>in</strong>e waistcircumference, age, BMI, gender, and past pregnancy (Table 2). The normal P-P plots and theplots of the homogeneity of variance residuals showed that there was a normal distribution andhomogeneity of variance of the residuals.46 | Chapter 3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!