preced<strong>in</strong>g GXT results on HR peak. Good correlation (ICC= 0.94; 95%CI 0.86-0.98) and agreement(p=0.7) for HR peakexists between SMBT and the preced<strong>in</strong>g GXT. These results might serve as<strong>in</strong>dicative for a gold standard accord<strong>in</strong>g to Midgley et al. [18, 19]. Midgley et al. reviewed availableliterature regard<strong>in</strong>g the verification phase follow<strong>in</strong>g a graded exercise test. In the present study,speed dur<strong>in</strong>g the verification phase was 0.2 or 0.3 km/h higher than speed dur<strong>in</strong>g the lastcompleted stage, as <strong>in</strong> persons <strong>with</strong> SIMD only an <strong>in</strong>crease of speed of 0.2 or 0.3 km/h is feasible[12]. This is considered an acceptable <strong>in</strong>crease of speed, because Midgley et al [19] stated that‘the verification phase should <strong>in</strong>corporate a workload higher than that atta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>crementalphase to conform to the orig<strong>in</strong>al concept of VO2max’. Furthermore, they <strong>in</strong>dicated that the meandifference <strong>in</strong> HR peakbetween the test and the SMBT should be maximal 1.9 beats/m<strong>in</strong>ute (SD 1.7)[19]. The results of our study show a mean difference of 1 beat/m<strong>in</strong>ute and a standard deviationof 1, which is <strong>with</strong><strong>in</strong> the limits drawn by Midgley [19]. The atta<strong>in</strong>ed performance levels thus werereached us<strong>in</strong>g maximal effort. When looked at the <strong>in</strong>dividual level, eleven persons met thecriterion of a maximal performance on the GXT, whereas four persons did not meet this criterion.The actual and estimated HR peakshow low correlation. This could <strong>in</strong>dicate that the equationdeveloped by Fernhall et al. [13] is not applicable to our sample of participants. In the Fernhallstudy, 144 of the 276 participants had mild ID [13]. Similar to the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of Kittredge et al. [34]we found the HR peakto be significantly lower than the estimated HR peak[34], suggest<strong>in</strong>g that theformula’s constant (β=0.56 <strong>in</strong> the Fernhall equation) should be corrected and take a higher valuefor people <strong>with</strong> SIMD. Hence, a recommendation for future research is to adjust the equation forestimat<strong>in</strong>g HR peakfor <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>with</strong> SIMD, enabl<strong>in</strong>g a valid calculation of the estimated HR peak,which is crucial <strong>in</strong> assess<strong>in</strong>g whether target heart rate has been reached for this specific group ofparticpants.S<strong>in</strong>ce both HR peakand atta<strong>in</strong>ed levels are significantly higher <strong>in</strong> the treadmill test than <strong>in</strong> theover ground test, the treadmill test is valid for measur<strong>in</strong>g maximal exercise capacity <strong>in</strong> people<strong>with</strong> SIMD and GMFCS-I. Environmental factors may expla<strong>in</strong> the test results of the GXT protocolas performed on the treadmill [35]. The constra<strong>in</strong>ts-led approach limits the degrees of freedomdur<strong>in</strong>g test<strong>in</strong>g [35], result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a more restrictive test situation. The <strong>physical</strong> constra<strong>in</strong>ts of thetreadmill, the sound of the runn<strong>in</strong>g walk<strong>in</strong>g belt, the side bars and the <strong>in</strong>structor stand<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>dthe participant all may stimulate the participant to cont<strong>in</strong>ue walk<strong>in</strong>g.Furthermore, issues of motivation, stress and the ability to understand test directions shouldbe considered when <strong>in</strong>terpret<strong>in</strong>g test results [36]. For people <strong>with</strong> SIMD motivation for <strong>physical</strong>activity is low [36] and extr<strong>in</strong>sic encouragement and rewards often dictate activity performance[37]. This pattern of behavior is also evident <strong>in</strong> our study. All but one participant neededencouragement, fourteen dur<strong>in</strong>g both test sessions and eleven dur<strong>in</strong>g one of the test sessions.Moreover, unfamiliar situations caused stress <strong>in</strong> several participants. R<strong>in</strong>tala et al. reviewedthe familiarization process <strong>in</strong> cardiorespiratory <strong>fitness</strong> test<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> persons <strong>with</strong> mild to moderate<strong>in</strong>tellectual disabilities, recommend<strong>in</strong>g a familiarization protocol [21]. In our study the protocolconsisted of walk<strong>in</strong>g the treadmill at least twice at regular walk<strong>in</strong>g speed before test<strong>in</strong>g.Participants did not reach their HR peaklevels dur<strong>in</strong>g these practice sessions. Frey et al. describedhow people <strong>with</strong> ID are hardly challenged by their support systems to exert <strong>physical</strong>ly [3]. Dur<strong>in</strong>gdata collection most participants were challenged up to volitional exhaustion [16] for the first time<strong>in</strong> their lives. This may put forward an explanation for the <strong>in</strong>sufficient feasibility of the SMBT. Bylett<strong>in</strong>g future participants practice at a sub-maximal exercise level, the feasibility of the SMBTmay improve. Furthermore, <strong>in</strong> future studies a familiarization protocol should be established <strong>with</strong>Chapter 5 | 83
well def<strong>in</strong>ed criteria for advancement from one familiarization level to the next.S<strong>in</strong>ce people <strong>with</strong> <strong>in</strong>tellectual disabilities tend to have lower motivation for <strong>physical</strong>activity [3, 16], we <strong>in</strong>cluded a motivation score <strong>in</strong>to the testprotocol. An aspect that may have<strong>in</strong>fluenced the motivation scores was that both the test leader and the <strong>in</strong>structor were aware ofthe estimated HR peak. This may have <strong>in</strong>fluenced the encouragement given, and as a consequence,the scored motivation. A significant correlation between observed motivation and HR peakexisteddur<strong>in</strong>g GXT2 for both the <strong>in</strong>structor and the test leader (Table 4). Nonetheless, <strong>in</strong> future studiesthe <strong>in</strong>ter-observer reliability of scored motivation should be assessed as well.Handrail support dur<strong>in</strong>g steady-state treadmill exercise reduces the momentary aerobicdemands [38, 39]. All but one participant held on to the handrail dur<strong>in</strong>g the test procedure. Whenwalk<strong>in</strong>g speed <strong>in</strong>creased some participants leaned more heavily on the handrail which may havehad an <strong>in</strong>fluence on the levels or HR peak[39, 40]. The achieved levels <strong>in</strong> the GXT treadmill mayhave been relatively high as a consequence of lean<strong>in</strong>g on the handrail.A limitation of this study was how to decide when maximal exercise level or volitionalexhaustion was reached. As for now, realiz<strong>in</strong>g the estimated HR peakseems to be the only objectivemeasure of maximal performance, which <strong>in</strong> the present study none of the participants achieved.R<strong>in</strong>tala et al. described volitional exhaustion [16] by signals such as heavy breath<strong>in</strong>g, maximalheart rate, uncoord<strong>in</strong>ated walk<strong>in</strong>g, sweat<strong>in</strong>g or verbal protest, which is too wide a range for a clearand workable measure. In future studies the volitional exhaustion has to be def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> a moreaccurate way.The results of this project could be used to develop an experimental study <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g thetra<strong>in</strong>ability of exercise capacity <strong>in</strong> people <strong>with</strong> SIMD. Treadmill tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g could possibly improvehealth related <strong>physical</strong> <strong>fitness</strong> and thereby health for people <strong>with</strong> multiple disabilities.Further experimental research on tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a population <strong>with</strong> SIMD is recommended.ConclusionThe ma<strong>in</strong> conclusion of our study is that a GXT protocol performed on a treadmill is a feasible,reliable and valid test for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g HR peakand exercise levels for people <strong>with</strong> SIMD andGMFCS-I. For this population, the GXT protocol has better validity for determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g HR peakandmaximal level than the SRT over ground.For future research, we recommend a revision of Fernhall’s equation so as to enable a betterprediction of the HR peakfor people <strong>with</strong> SIMD.Furthermore, future studies should comprise of a familiarization protocol <strong>with</strong> well-def<strong>in</strong>edcriteria so as to reduce the <strong>in</strong>fluence of stress, stemm<strong>in</strong>g from unfamiliarity <strong>with</strong> the testsituation, on the test results. Moreover, volitional exhaustion should be def<strong>in</strong>ed more clearly us<strong>in</strong>gunambiguous variables. F<strong>in</strong>ally, an evaluation of <strong>in</strong>ter-tester reliability of scored motivation shouldbe established.AcknowledgementsThe authors k<strong>in</strong>dly acknowledge and thank the participants for their participation <strong>in</strong> this study,their representatives for giv<strong>in</strong>g permission for this and the <strong>physical</strong> education <strong>in</strong>structors for theireffort. The authors are grateful for the supportive and valuable feedback. The authors have noconflict of <strong>in</strong>terest to declare.84 | Chapter 5
- Page 2 and 3:
Measuring physical fitnessin person
- Page 4:
Rijksuniversiteit GroningenMeasurin
- Page 10 and 11:
Chapter 1IntroductionChapter 1 | 9
- Page 12 and 13:
overweight [15]. This prevalence is
- Page 14 and 15:
Theoretical framework of the studyI
- Page 16 and 17:
Components of physical fitnessThe a
- Page 18 and 19:
Therefore, a study is put forward w
- Page 20 and 21:
2002;40:436-444.19 Temple VA, Frey
- Page 22 and 23:
Chapter 2Feasibility and reliabilit
- Page 24 and 25:
IntroductionPhysical fitness and he
- Page 26 and 27:
GMFCS was presented to the investig
- Page 28 and 29:
Body weightTo determine the body we
- Page 30 and 31:
Table 1 Results of Wilcoxon rank te
- Page 32 and 33:
Calculation of heightThe mean (SD)
- Page 34 and 35: DiscussionThe results of our study
- Page 36 and 37: References1 Bouchard C, Shepard RJ,
- Page 38 and 39: 37 Rimmer J, Kelly LE, Rosentswieg
- Page 40 and 41: Chapter 3Measuring waist circumfere
- Page 42 and 43: IntroductionChildren and adults wit
- Page 44 and 45: participants. These calculations as
- Page 46 and 47: Data analysisThe data were analyzed
- Page 48: Table 2. Simple regression analysis
- Page 54 and 55: Chapter 4Feasibility and reliabilit
- Page 56 and 57: IntroductionPeople with intellectua
- Page 58 and 59: Eighty representatives gave permiss
- Page 60 and 61: 3) The measurement procedure: The m
- Page 62 and 63: and whether motivation influenced t
- Page 64 and 65: Table 3. Mean peak heart rate achie
- Page 66 and 67: AcknowledgementsThis research was f
- Page 68 and 69: 21 Hopkins WG, Gaeta H, Thomas AC,
- Page 70 and 71: Chapter 5Psychometric quality of a
- Page 72 and 73: IntroductionIntellectual disability
- Page 74 and 75: Exclusion criteria were mental or p
- Page 76 and 77: participant had fulfilled the task.
- Page 78 and 79: Table 2. Descriptive results peak h
- Page 80 and 81: Table 3. Test-retest reliability of
- Page 82 and 83: Table 4. Correlation scored motivat
- Page 86 and 87: References1 Schalock R, Brown I, Br
- Page 88 and 89: 37 Stanish HI, Temple VA, Frey GC.
- Page 90 and 91: Chapter 6Feasibility and reliabilit
- Page 92 and 93: IntroductionLocomotor skills in peo
- Page 94 and 95: this study was to evaluate the feas
- Page 96 and 97: obtained from the legal representat
- Page 98 and 99: Modified Berg Balance Scale scoresI
- Page 100 and 101: Modified Berg Balance Scale scoresT
- Page 102 and 103: References1 Van Erkelens-Zwets JHJ
- Page 104 and 105: 39 Dorai-Raj S. Binomial Confidence
- Page 106 and 107: Chapter 7Feasibility, test-retest r
- Page 108 and 109: IntroductionPersons with profound i
- Page 110 and 111: DesignThe muscle tone and spasticit
- Page 112 and 113: Interrater reliabilityFirstly, to d
- Page 114 and 115: Table 3. Summary of the statistical
- Page 116 and 117: Table 6. Summary of the statistical
- Page 118 and 119: RecommendationsThe feasibility of c
- Page 120 and 121: 18 Gielen EJJM. Is spasticiteit te
- Page 122 and 123: Chapter 8Heart Rate Pattern as an I
- Page 124 and 125: IntroductionIt is important to gain
- Page 126 and 127: 48 persons18 persons lacked permiss
- Page 128 and 129: Furthermore, the mean and the range
- Page 130 and 131: Table 3. Day-to-day outline of the
- Page 132 and 133: Relation between heart rate pattern
- Page 134 and 135:
patterns in this study we can concl
- Page 136 and 137:
References1 Emerson E. Underweight,
- Page 138 and 139:
38 Multilevel Models Project (2004)
- Page 140 and 141:
Chapter 9General DiscussionChapter
- Page 142 and 143:
on this. To sum up, testing in pers
- Page 144 and 145:
for future research it is recommend
- Page 146 and 147:
studies. Randomized Controlled Tria
- Page 148 and 149:
of these individuals require more?
- Page 150 and 151:
19 Lahtinen U, Rintala P, Malin A.
- Page 152 and 153:
SummarySummary | 151
- Page 154 and 155:
problems in both locomotor skills a
- Page 156 and 157:
subjects are to be applied to perso
- Page 158 and 159:
may be an indicator of activity lev
- Page 160 and 161:
SamenvattingSamenvatting | 159
- Page 162 and 163:
InleidingVoldoende bewegen en fithe
- Page 164 and 165:
verstandelijk niveau en bepaalde mo
- Page 166 and 167:
Hieruit bleek, dat de motivatie van
- Page 168 and 169:
Verder is duidelijk geworden dat me
- Page 170 and 171:
DankwoordDankwoord | 169
- Page 172 and 173:
De leden van de leescommissie, prof
- Page 174 and 175:
Judith van der Boom, dank je wel vo
- Page 176 and 177:
Dankwoord | 175
- Page 178 and 179:
Curriculum vitaeCurriculum vitae |
- Page 180:
Curriculum vitae | 179