13.07.2015 Views

[tel-00726959, v1] Caractériser le milieu interstellaire ... - HAL - INRIA

[tel-00726959, v1] Caractériser le milieu interstellaire ... - HAL - INRIA

[tel-00726959, v1] Caractériser le milieu interstellaire ... - HAL - INRIA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

J. Pety and N. Rodríguez-Fernández: Revisiting the theory of interferometric wide-field synthesisTab<strong>le</strong> 4. Minimum sizes of the dirty beam images to get an imagefidelity or a dynamic range greater than a given value.Minimum fidelityaθ alias /θ fwhmor dynamic range ( f b = 0) b ( f b = 0.0625) ( f b = 0.1)10 2 2.2 2.2 2.210 3 3.5 3.7 6.610 4 8.4 13.4 13.710 5 19.8 >20.0 >20.0Notes. (a) The image sizes are expressed in units of the primary beamfull width at half maxium. (b) The computation is done for 3 differentratios of the secondary-to-primary diameters (i.e. f b , the antenna blockagefactors). The values are derived from the modeling of the antennapower patterns shown in Fig. 3.<strong>tel</strong>-<strong>00726959</strong>, version 1 - 31 Aug 2012fidelity of interferometric imaging at (sub)-millimeter wave<strong>le</strong>ngthswill be limited to a few hundred. In this case, V ∼(α p ,α s ) aliasing can be to<strong>le</strong>rated when the amplitude of B is <strong>le</strong>ssthan a fraction of the inverse of the maximum instrumentalfidelity;2. the maximum instrumental fidelity is much greater than theimage fidelity, as can be the case at centimeter wave<strong>le</strong>ngths.In this case, V ∼(α p , α s ) aliasing can only be to<strong>le</strong>rated whenthe amplitude of B is <strong>le</strong>ss than a fraction of the inverse of thedynamic range of the image.The criterion derived in each case gives a typical image size(θ alias ), which can be converted into the desired u p sampling rate.To be more quantitative, Fig. 3 models the normalized antennapower patterns of an antenna illuminated by a Gaussian beamof 12.5 dB edge taper and with a given blockage factor (ratio ofthe secondary-to-primary diameters). The top panel presents anideal case without secondary miror, whi<strong>le</strong> the midd<strong>le</strong> and bottompanels present simp<strong>le</strong> models of the ALMA and PdBI antennas.The largest angular sizes at which the power patterns are<strong>le</strong>ss than a given value, P 0 , is a first-order estimate of θ alias /2toget a fidelity or dynamic range higher than 1/P 0 .Tab<strong>le</strong>4 givesthe values of θ alias /θ fwhm as a function of the searched fidelityor dynamic range. This condition is sufficient but not necessary.Indeed, the aliasing properties also depend on the brightness distributionof the source.4.2.3. The u sampling rate of I dirty (u)We have no garantee that the sky outside the targeted field ofview is devoid of signal, so the only way to ensure a given dynamicrange inside the targeted field of view is to choose theimage size large enough so that the aliasing of potential outsidesources is negligib<strong>le</strong>. This means that the dirty image size mustbe equal to the field-of-view size plus the to<strong>le</strong>rab<strong>le</strong> aliasing sizeθ image = θ field + θ alias . (55)The conjugate uv distance and associated uv sampling then ared image =d fieldand ∂u = d image· (56)1 + d fieldn sampd alias4.2.4. The u ′ and u ′′ sampling rates of D(u ′ ,u ′′ )Fig.The u ′′ axis must thus be samp<strong>le</strong>d at the same rate as the seconddimension of the definition space of S , i.e., as u s .Moreover,u ′ has in this equation a behavior (u ′ = u p + u ′′s ) similar to3. Simp<strong>le</strong> models of the antenna power patterns as a function ofthe sky ang<strong>le</strong> in units of half the primary beam FWHM (θ fwhm ). Inthe 3 cases shown, the illumination is Gaussian with an edge taperof 12.5 dB but 3 different ratios of the secondary-to-primary diameters(i.e. f b , the antenna blockage factors) are considered (see e.g.Goldsmith 1998, Chap. 6). The midd<strong>le</strong> and bottom panels respectivelymodel ALMA and PdBI antennas. The red lines define the minimumangular sizes for which the antenna power pattern is <strong>le</strong>ss than a givenfraction.u (=u p + u s ). It must thus have the same sampling behavior as u.This sampling rate (∂u ′ = d image /n samp ) is quite high. Some deconvolutionmethods (see below) allow us to relax this samplingrate.4.3. Absence of gridding “correction”Imaging of sing<strong>le</strong>-field observations goes through the followingsteps: 1) convolution by a gridding kernel; 2) regular resampling;3) fast Fourier transform; and 4) gridding “correction”. The socal<strong>le</strong>dgridding “correction” is a division of the dirty beam anddirty image by the Fourier transform of the gridding kernel usedin the initial convolution. This step is mandatory when imagingsing<strong>le</strong>-field observations to keep the image-plane measurementequation as a simp<strong>le</strong> convolution equation (see e.g. Sramek &Schwab 1989). When imaging wide-field observations, as proposedhere, the Fourier transform along the α s dimension, followedby the shift-and-average operation, freeze the convolutionkernel into the dirty beam of the wide-field measurement equation.This is why the gridding “correction” step is irre<strong>le</strong>vant here.Page 9 of 21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!