pdf - Protestant Reformed Churches in America
pdf - Protestant Reformed Churches in America
pdf - Protestant Reformed Churches in America
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
did not identify Thomas Bradward<strong>in</strong>e's theology as the object oftheir attack. Oberman demonstrates conclusively thatBradward<strong>in</strong>e's contemporary and fellow Mertonian, ThomasBuck<strong>in</strong>gham, attacked the theology of The Cause ofGod <strong>in</strong> hisQuestiones. The subtitle reads:Questions treated by Thomas Buck<strong>in</strong>gham. late Chancellor ofExeter Cathedral, show<strong>in</strong>g that there is a Catholic middle coursebetween the errors ofPe/agius, Cicero andScotus and that eternalpredest<strong>in</strong>ation, preord<strong>in</strong>ation andprevo/ution are consistent withfreedom ofwill and human merit. 2~At certa<strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>ts Buck<strong>in</strong>gham even takes the words ofBradward<strong>in</strong>e from The Cause ofGod but adds the word "non"' totake the opposite position from Bradward<strong>in</strong>e. 26 A contemporary(Thomas ofCracow) claims that Buck<strong>in</strong>gham taught for a time <strong>in</strong>Paris and there "made a name for himself as a critic ofBradward<strong>in</strong>e."21John Baconthorp (d. 1348), <strong>in</strong> his Commentary on theSententiae, did attempt to set forth Bradward<strong>in</strong>e's mean<strong>in</strong>g, and <strong>in</strong>a sense therefore defended Bradward<strong>in</strong>e. The trouble was that hedid not capture the true mean<strong>in</strong>g of Bradward<strong>in</strong>e, nor was heuncritical of his theology.2RAnother contemporary reaction to Bradward<strong>in</strong>e is found <strong>in</strong>John Rod<strong>in</strong>gton, particularly <strong>in</strong> his Quodlibet de Conscientia.Bradward<strong>in</strong>e's <strong>in</strong>fluence is seen <strong>in</strong> that Rod<strong>in</strong>gton does hold topredest<strong>in</strong>ation, but <strong>in</strong> effect denies the sovereignty of God andaJIows that man can merit eternal life without grace. It is especially<strong>in</strong> the area of merit and man's will that Rod<strong>in</strong>gton was react<strong>in</strong>gaga<strong>in</strong>st Bradward<strong>in</strong>e's theology.29The controversy did not die out immediately. Uthred ofBolden (d. 1397), a memberofthe Benedict<strong>in</strong>e Order, writes ofthe25. Oberman, Archbishop Bradward<strong>in</strong>e, p. 190.26. Oberman, Archbishop Bradward<strong>in</strong>e, pp. 192-193.27. Oberman, Archbishop Bradward<strong>in</strong>e, p. 189.28. Oberman, Archbishop Bradward<strong>in</strong>e, pp. 194-195.29. Oberman. Archbishop Bradward<strong>in</strong>e, pp. 196-198.22 PRTJ