pdf - Protestant Reformed Churches in America
pdf - Protestant Reformed Churches in America
pdf - Protestant Reformed Churches in America
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
to Bradward<strong>in</strong>e as oneof"two pre-em<strong>in</strong>ent doctors ofourorder,"37Oberman warns that the question of"<strong>in</strong>fluence" is a most difficultone, well nigh impossible to substantiate unless the <strong>in</strong>dividualpersonally describes the <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>in</strong> his writ<strong>in</strong>gs. Thus, whilealmost all agree that Wyclif was <strong>in</strong>fluenced by Bradward<strong>in</strong>e,op<strong>in</strong>ions differ as to the extent and nature.One major problem <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g possible <strong>in</strong>fluence ofoneman on a later is the fact that a theologian's writ<strong>in</strong>gs are greatlyaffected by the issues of the day. Oberman notes what whileWyclif was only one generation younger than Bradward<strong>in</strong>e, "<strong>in</strong>that very period new problems were raised and new developmentstook place, which were ofsuch great significance for the history ofChristian thought, that <strong>in</strong> reality the distance between Bradward<strong>in</strong>eand Wiclifis considerably greaterthan that between Wiclifand theReformation."3R The issues ofWyclif's day <strong>in</strong>volved the doctr<strong>in</strong>esofthe church, Scripture, and the Lord's Supper, ofwhich little ornoth<strong>in</strong>g is found <strong>in</strong> Bradward<strong>in</strong>e's The Cause ofGod.While that is admittedly true, it is also a fact that Wyclif'sdoctr<strong>in</strong>e ofthe church was greatly determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the doctr<strong>in</strong>e ofpredest<strong>in</strong>ation, which <strong>in</strong> turn ledhim to differwith the hierarchicalview ofthe church ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed by medieval theologians. This is acrucial po<strong>in</strong>t, because Wyclif, and later Hus, would def<strong>in</strong>e thechurch <strong>in</strong> terms ofthe elect members rather than the magisterium- the clergy. The doctr<strong>in</strong>e of sovereign predest<strong>in</strong>ation is thefoundation of that position. In addition, Wyclif shared the profoundreverence for the Scriptures possessed by Bradward<strong>in</strong>e. Nodoubt also, Wyclif's high regard for August<strong>in</strong>e was fostered byBradward<strong>in</strong>e. All this would lead one to conclude that God did useBradward<strong>in</strong>e to teachWyclif.Oberman's skepticism on the question of Bradward<strong>in</strong>e's<strong>in</strong>fluence on the Reformation is justified. Still, he notes thesimilarities <strong>in</strong> that, for example, Bradward<strong>in</strong>e, Wyclif, and Luther37. De Dom<strong>in</strong>o don<strong>in</strong>o, (ed. R. L. Poole, 1890), I, p. 115, quoted byOberman, Archbishop Bradward<strong>in</strong>e, p. 198. The other doctor referred tois Richard FitzRalph, Archbishop of Armagh.38. Oberman, Archbishop Bradward<strong>in</strong>e, p. 202.26 PRTJ