13.07.2015 Views

pdf - Protestant Reformed Churches in America

pdf - Protestant Reformed Churches in America

pdf - Protestant Reformed Churches in America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

to Bradward<strong>in</strong>e as oneof"two pre-em<strong>in</strong>ent doctors ofourorder,"37Oberman warns that the question of"<strong>in</strong>fluence" is a most difficultone, well nigh impossible to substantiate unless the <strong>in</strong>dividualpersonally describes the <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>in</strong> his writ<strong>in</strong>gs. Thus, whilealmost all agree that Wyclif was <strong>in</strong>fluenced by Bradward<strong>in</strong>e,op<strong>in</strong>ions differ as to the extent and nature.One major problem <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g possible <strong>in</strong>fluence ofoneman on a later is the fact that a theologian's writ<strong>in</strong>gs are greatlyaffected by the issues of the day. Oberman notes what whileWyclif was only one generation younger than Bradward<strong>in</strong>e, "<strong>in</strong>that very period new problems were raised and new developmentstook place, which were ofsuch great significance for the history ofChristian thought, that <strong>in</strong> reality the distance between Bradward<strong>in</strong>eand Wiclifis considerably greaterthan that between Wiclifand theReformation."3R The issues ofWyclif's day <strong>in</strong>volved the doctr<strong>in</strong>esofthe church, Scripture, and the Lord's Supper, ofwhich little ornoth<strong>in</strong>g is found <strong>in</strong> Bradward<strong>in</strong>e's The Cause ofGod.While that is admittedly true, it is also a fact that Wyclif'sdoctr<strong>in</strong>e ofthe church was greatly determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the doctr<strong>in</strong>e ofpredest<strong>in</strong>ation, which <strong>in</strong> turn ledhim to differwith the hierarchicalview ofthe church ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed by medieval theologians. This is acrucial po<strong>in</strong>t, because Wyclif, and later Hus, would def<strong>in</strong>e thechurch <strong>in</strong> terms ofthe elect members rather than the magisterium- the clergy. The doctr<strong>in</strong>e of sovereign predest<strong>in</strong>ation is thefoundation of that position. In addition, Wyclif shared the profoundreverence for the Scriptures possessed by Bradward<strong>in</strong>e. Nodoubt also, Wyclif's high regard for August<strong>in</strong>e was fostered byBradward<strong>in</strong>e. All this would lead one to conclude that God did useBradward<strong>in</strong>e to teachWyclif.Oberman's skepticism on the question of Bradward<strong>in</strong>e's<strong>in</strong>fluence on the Reformation is justified. Still, he notes thesimilarities <strong>in</strong> that, for example, Bradward<strong>in</strong>e, Wyclif, and Luther37. De Dom<strong>in</strong>o don<strong>in</strong>o, (ed. R. L. Poole, 1890), I, p. 115, quoted byOberman, Archbishop Bradward<strong>in</strong>e, p. 198. The other doctor referred tois Richard FitzRalph, Archbishop of Armagh.38. Oberman, Archbishop Bradward<strong>in</strong>e, p. 202.26 PRTJ

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!