13.07.2015 Views

pdf - Protestant Reformed Churches in America

pdf - Protestant Reformed Churches in America

pdf - Protestant Reformed Churches in America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Review ArticleA few pages later, Lillback analyzes Calv<strong>in</strong>'s doctr<strong>in</strong>e ofthecovenant as teach<strong>in</strong>g that "an <strong>in</strong>dissoluble bond exists betweenChrist and the elect" (p. 180).In the chapter, "Covenant, Predest<strong>in</strong>ation, and Hypocrisy <strong>in</strong>Calv<strong>in</strong>'8Theology," Lillback makes an extraord<strong>in</strong>arily significantquotation from Calv<strong>in</strong>'s commentary on Jeremiah 22:29, 30: "Weare taught that God is ever so consistent with himself, that hiscovenant, which he has made with Christ and with all his members,neverfails" (p. 213). The quotation shows that Calv<strong>in</strong> held that thecovenant is made with Christ as the head of the covenant and,therefore, with "his members," that is, the elect; that the covenant"never fails," that is, cannot be broken, <strong>in</strong> the sense ofnullified, bythose with whom it is made; and that this firm and last<strong>in</strong>g characterofthe covenant is due to God's be<strong>in</strong>g '~consistent with himself,"that is, His be<strong>in</strong>g the faithful, unchangeable God.Lillback himselfis forced to acknowledge that Calv<strong>in</strong> taughtan unconditional, unbreakable covenant "from God's vantagepo<strong>in</strong>t": "The covenant from God's vantage po<strong>in</strong>t is absolutelyunconditional. God's absolute goodness means that He cannotdeny His promises to His people:' "Yet, <strong>in</strong> another sense:'Lillback quickly adds, ~~that is from man's vantage po<strong>in</strong>t, thecovenant is conditional" (p. 169).When, a few pages later, Lillback comes to summarizeCalv<strong>in</strong>'s doctr<strong>in</strong>e ofthe covenant, he describes it, exclusively, asa "bilateral, mutual. conditional, and breakable covenant" (p.175). Man's '~vantagepo<strong>in</strong>t" has evidently won out. There is noteven a word about "God's vantage po<strong>in</strong>t." This is not surpris<strong>in</strong>g.When theologians play with the contradiction, "God saves men,but men also save themselves." the false gospel of man's sav<strong>in</strong>ghimself always drives out the gospel ofsalvation by grace alone.Contribut<strong>in</strong>g to Lillback's analysis of Calv<strong>in</strong>'s doctr<strong>in</strong>e ofthe covenant is Lillback's confusion of "mutual" with "conditional."Because Calv<strong>in</strong> taught that the covenant is "mutual,"Lillback concludes that for Calv<strong>in</strong> the covenant is conditional.When Calv<strong>in</strong> taught that the covenant is mutual, he meant that thecovenant makes demands upon God's covenant people. In thecovenant, they are called to love, fear, serve, and obey God. TheirNovember, 2001 51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!