Review Article:The Recent Bondage ofJohn Calv<strong>in</strong>:A Critique ofPeter A. Lillback'sThe B<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g ofGodDavid J. EngelsmaThe B<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of God: Calv<strong>in</strong>'s Role <strong>in</strong> the Development ofCovenant Theology, by Peter A. Lillback. Grand Rapids: Baker,200 1. Pp. 331. $24.99 (paper).This is an unconv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g treatment of a worthwhile subject:the doctr<strong>in</strong>e ofthe covenant <strong>in</strong> John Calv<strong>in</strong>. It is a disturb<strong>in</strong>g book:Calv<strong>in</strong> is made to teach the doctr<strong>in</strong>e ofjustification by faith andworks.This much can be said favorably. Lillback demonstrates thatCalv<strong>in</strong> was a covenant theologian <strong>in</strong> the sense that the covenantwas "an <strong>in</strong>tegral feature ofCalv<strong>in</strong>'s theology" (p. 137). Also, asthe title <strong>in</strong>dicates, Lillback discovers that Calv<strong>in</strong> viewed thecovenant as a bond. It is remarkable that of late Presbyterian and<strong>Reformed</strong> theologians are describ<strong>in</strong>g the covenant between Godand His people <strong>in</strong> terms of fellowship, a bond, and a relationshipoflove. Little is heard ofthe covenant as contract, or agreement,or arrangement of promise and demand, which used to be theprevail<strong>in</strong>g position. But the theologians do not expla<strong>in</strong> why theyNovember, 200 I 47
have moved away from the notion ofthe covenant as contract to theconception of the covenant as bond of fellowship.Regardless that one shies away from describ<strong>in</strong>g the rich,liv<strong>in</strong>g covenant relation between God and His people as a contract,his doctr<strong>in</strong>e of the covenant may still be that ofa cold, bus<strong>in</strong>esslikebarga<strong>in</strong> between God and men. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Lillback, suchwas the theology of John Calv<strong>in</strong>. Lillback is determ<strong>in</strong>ed to showthat for Calv<strong>in</strong> the covenant is a conditional, breakable relationbetween God and every Israelite <strong>in</strong> the Old Testament and betweenGod and every memberofthe visible, <strong>in</strong>stituted church <strong>in</strong> the NewTestament. God makes His covenant with all alike. But thecovenant is conditional. Whether it cont<strong>in</strong>ues with a person,whether it will bestow its bless<strong>in</strong>gs upon this person, and whetherit will br<strong>in</strong>g the person to heavenly life and glory depend squarelyupon certa<strong>in</strong> works that the person himseIfmust do. These worksare faith and obedience. [fthe person with whom the covenant ismade fails to fulfill the condition, the covenant with him is broken,and he perishes.Calv<strong>in</strong> taught a "bilateral, mutual, conditional, and breakablecovenant" (p. 175). [n the theology of Calv<strong>in</strong>, "the covenant ismutual, conditional and potentially breakable" (p. 264).[f this was, <strong>in</strong> fact, Calv<strong>in</strong>'s doctr<strong>in</strong>e, he overthrew <strong>in</strong> hiscovenant theology everyth<strong>in</strong>g that he taught <strong>in</strong> his doctr<strong>in</strong>e ofsalvation. Calv<strong>in</strong>'s soteriology was the gospel of God's efficaciousdeliverance of totally depraved s<strong>in</strong>ners by grace alone.Grace is particular, <strong>in</strong> Calv<strong>in</strong>'s thought, <strong>in</strong>asmuch as it has itssource <strong>in</strong> and is <strong>in</strong>fallibly directed by election. And this election,accompanied by an equally eternal and sovereign reprobation, isunconditional.A doctr<strong>in</strong>e ofa general, conditional, breakable covenant overthrowsthe gospel ofsalvation by particular, unconditional, irresistiblegrace s<strong>in</strong>ce the covenant concerns grace and the salvation thatgrace gives. The very name ofthe covenant is "covenant ofgrace."Even such an ardent advocate ofa conditional, breakable covenantas Peter Lillback acknowledges that the covenant is grace-sav<strong>in</strong>ggrace-to those with whom the covenant is made; that the bless<strong>in</strong>gsbestowed by the covenant are the bless<strong>in</strong>gs ofrighteousness, holi-48 PRTJ
- Page 1 and 2: ProtestantReformedTheologicalJourna
- Page 3 and 4: EDITOR'S NOTESProf. Russell J. Dyks
- Page 5 and 6: For there are many, even l unruly,
- Page 7 and 8: happen to hold unwittingly to some
- Page 9 and 10: tion oftheir false teachings. II Pe
- Page 11 and 12: est, they are very weak, at worst,
- Page 13 and 14: truth~' (see I Tim. 4: 1 - 4). Ever
- Page 15 and 16: Thomas Bradwardine:Forgotten Mediev
- Page 17 and 18: ated grace and uncreated grace. Unc
- Page 19 and 20: Bradwardine faces the question ofth
- Page 21 and 22: the age, namely, that having set fo
- Page 23 and 24: did not identify Thomas Bradwardine
- Page 25 and 26: The first is that Bradwardine was a
- Page 27 and 28: to Bradwardine as oneof"two pre-emi
- Page 29 and 30: Gospels, Acts, and Revelation. Sir
- Page 31 and 32: power of the papacy in Bradwardine'
- Page 33 and 34: The Serious Callof the Gospel -Is t
- Page 35 and 36: elieve th~s proclamation with uprig
- Page 37 and 38: to bring good news with their "fig
- Page 39 and 40: nation, we read of Melchisedek, the
- Page 41 and 42: official activity ofa monarch's her
- Page 43 and 44: 8): "Calling is ofthose elect and r
- Page 45 and 46: ut all his posterity unable to obey
- Page 47: alone, and He saves whom He will. E
- Page 51 and 52: every member ofthe visible, institu
- Page 53 and 54: fulfilling this calling is their pa
- Page 55 and 56: contingent. Further, Calvin did not
- Page 57 and 58: ofacceptance in terms of merit, ins
- Page 59 and 60: covenant ofgrace and works, or it i
- Page 61 and 62: Spiritual, Suffers Them to DefileTh
- Page 63 and 64: the gospel is preached" (p. 212).In
- Page 65 and 66: "They do not hold that JesusChrist
- Page 67 and 68: II Corinthians 3:6 that "the letter
- Page 69 and 70: is to oppose and to repulsethat sec
- Page 71 and 72: Rightly Divided: Readings inBiblica
- Page 73 and 74: is necessary speaks volumesabout th
- Page 75 and 76: Guilt, Grace and Gratitude,Lectures
- Page 77 and 78: 76ted under the new? If it wererigh
- Page 79 and 80: er to keep himself holy; forthe Sab
- Page 81 and 82: there is room for both positionsin
- Page 83 and 84: Dr. Gannett's eschatologyalso effec
- Page 85 and 86: that, but man has a corrupt nature(
- Page 87 and 88: the love of God is "universal"(p. 5
- Page 89 and 90: ever, throughout the book thereis n