Thomas Bradward<strong>in</strong>e<strong>in</strong>g?" But Peter did not f<strong>in</strong>d it convenient to hear him, and cont<strong>in</strong>uedto sleep; and. <strong>in</strong> consequence, the Pelagian heresy, <strong>in</strong> itsgrossest and most <strong>in</strong>jurious forms. prevailed generally over thewhole church <strong>in</strong> the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of the sixteenth century.35Even so, it is worth explor<strong>in</strong>g the possibility that God usedBradward<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> a different way, namely, to assist others later <strong>in</strong>history when God determ<strong>in</strong>ed to reform His church. The first<strong>in</strong>stance of such possible <strong>in</strong>fluence is on John WycHf. Wyclif(c.1329-1384) was a theologian and scholar ofOxford, <strong>in</strong> MertonCollege, as Bradward<strong>in</strong>e had been. Many church historians po<strong>in</strong>ttothe <strong>in</strong>fluence ofBradward<strong>in</strong>e on this laterpre-reformer. Topladyis representative, writ<strong>in</strong>g that Bradward<strong>in</strong>e "was <strong>in</strong> some sense,Dr. Wicliffs spiritual father: for it was the perusal ofBradward<strong>in</strong>e'swrit<strong>in</strong>g, which next to the Holy Scriptures, opened the protoreformer'seyes to discover the genu<strong>in</strong>e doctr<strong>in</strong>e of faith andjustification."36Oberman is more cautious. While not<strong>in</strong>g that Wyclifhimselfreveals that he had a high regard for Bradward<strong>in</strong>e when he refers35 Cunn<strong>in</strong>gham, William. Historical Theologv (Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh: TheBanner of Truth Trust. 1979) vol. 1, pp. 467-477.36 Toplady. Works, p. 106. Lewis Sergent. <strong>in</strong> his work. John Wyclif:Last of/he Schoo/men andfirst ofthe English Reformers (New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1892), p. 69, writes that Bradward<strong>in</strong>e's "teach<strong>in</strong>gcommended itselfnot a little to the men ofhis day, and Wyclifwas deeplyimbued with it.~· He goes so far as to say that "There is clearly a sense<strong>in</strong> which Bradward<strong>in</strong>e was a forerunner ofthe Calv<strong>in</strong>ists. or ratheroftheearly English predest<strong>in</strong>arians.II K. B. McFarlane, John Wycliffe and theBeg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>gs of English Nonconformity (New York: The MacmillanCompany, 1953) ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s that the two precursors to whom Wyclif"wasmost <strong>in</strong>debted [were] Bradward<strong>in</strong>e and FitzRalph" (p.12). He avers that"Wyclifwas <strong>in</strong>debted to the 'Profound Doctor' Thomas Bradward<strong>in</strong>e forhis predest<strong>in</strong>arianism, ... though ... he gave his borrow<strong>in</strong>gs a characteristictwist of his own" (p. 30). Later he says that Wyclif "was anuncompromis<strong>in</strong>g predest<strong>in</strong>arian. He derived his grisly creed from ThomasBradward<strong>in</strong>e ... and-with important differences-from their commonmaster, August<strong>in</strong>e" (po 92).November, 200 I 25
to Bradward<strong>in</strong>e as oneof"two pre-em<strong>in</strong>ent doctors ofourorder,"37Oberman warns that the question of"<strong>in</strong>fluence" is a most difficultone, well nigh impossible to substantiate unless the <strong>in</strong>dividualpersonally describes the <strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>in</strong> his writ<strong>in</strong>gs. Thus, whilealmost all agree that Wyclif was <strong>in</strong>fluenced by Bradward<strong>in</strong>e,op<strong>in</strong>ions differ as to the extent and nature.One major problem <strong>in</strong> identify<strong>in</strong>g possible <strong>in</strong>fluence ofoneman on a later is the fact that a theologian's writ<strong>in</strong>gs are greatlyaffected by the issues of the day. Oberman notes what whileWyclif was only one generation younger than Bradward<strong>in</strong>e, "<strong>in</strong>that very period new problems were raised and new developmentstook place, which were ofsuch great significance for the history ofChristian thought, that <strong>in</strong> reality the distance between Bradward<strong>in</strong>eand Wiclifis considerably greaterthan that between Wiclifand theReformation."3R The issues ofWyclif's day <strong>in</strong>volved the doctr<strong>in</strong>esofthe church, Scripture, and the Lord's Supper, ofwhich little ornoth<strong>in</strong>g is found <strong>in</strong> Bradward<strong>in</strong>e's The Cause ofGod.While that is admittedly true, it is also a fact that Wyclif'sdoctr<strong>in</strong>e ofthe church was greatly determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the doctr<strong>in</strong>e ofpredest<strong>in</strong>ation, which <strong>in</strong> turn ledhim to differwith the hierarchicalview ofthe church ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed by medieval theologians. This is acrucial po<strong>in</strong>t, because Wyclif, and later Hus, would def<strong>in</strong>e thechurch <strong>in</strong> terms ofthe elect members rather than the magisterium- the clergy. The doctr<strong>in</strong>e of sovereign predest<strong>in</strong>ation is thefoundation of that position. In addition, Wyclif shared the profoundreverence for the Scriptures possessed by Bradward<strong>in</strong>e. Nodoubt also, Wyclif's high regard for August<strong>in</strong>e was fostered byBradward<strong>in</strong>e. All this would lead one to conclude that God did useBradward<strong>in</strong>e to teachWyclif.Oberman's skepticism on the question of Bradward<strong>in</strong>e's<strong>in</strong>fluence on the Reformation is justified. Still, he notes thesimilarities <strong>in</strong> that, for example, Bradward<strong>in</strong>e, Wyclif, and Luther37. De Dom<strong>in</strong>o don<strong>in</strong>o, (ed. R. L. Poole, 1890), I, p. 115, quoted byOberman, Archbishop Bradward<strong>in</strong>e, p. 198. The other doctor referred tois Richard FitzRalph, Archbishop of Armagh.38. Oberman, Archbishop Bradward<strong>in</strong>e, p. 202.26 PRTJ
- Page 1 and 2: ProtestantReformedTheologicalJourna
- Page 3 and 4: EDITOR'S NOTESProf. Russell J. Dyks
- Page 5 and 6: For there are many, even l unruly,
- Page 7 and 8: happen to hold unwittingly to some
- Page 9 and 10: tion oftheir false teachings. II Pe
- Page 11 and 12: est, they are very weak, at worst,
- Page 13 and 14: truth~' (see I Tim. 4: 1 - 4). Ever
- Page 15 and 16: Thomas Bradwardine:Forgotten Mediev
- Page 17 and 18: ated grace and uncreated grace. Unc
- Page 19 and 20: Bradwardine faces the question ofth
- Page 21 and 22: the age, namely, that having set fo
- Page 23 and 24: did not identify Thomas Bradwardine
- Page 25: The first is that Bradwardine was a
- Page 29 and 30: Gospels, Acts, and Revelation. Sir
- Page 31 and 32: power of the papacy in Bradwardine'
- Page 33 and 34: The Serious Callof the Gospel -Is t
- Page 35 and 36: elieve th~s proclamation with uprig
- Page 37 and 38: to bring good news with their "fig
- Page 39 and 40: nation, we read of Melchisedek, the
- Page 41 and 42: official activity ofa monarch's her
- Page 43 and 44: 8): "Calling is ofthose elect and r
- Page 45 and 46: ut all his posterity unable to obey
- Page 47 and 48: alone, and He saves whom He will. E
- Page 49 and 50: have moved away from the notion oft
- Page 51 and 52: every member ofthe visible, institu
- Page 53 and 54: fulfilling this calling is their pa
- Page 55 and 56: contingent. Further, Calvin did not
- Page 57 and 58: ofacceptance in terms of merit, ins
- Page 59 and 60: covenant ofgrace and works, or it i
- Page 61 and 62: Spiritual, Suffers Them to DefileTh
- Page 63 and 64: the gospel is preached" (p. 212).In
- Page 65 and 66: "They do not hold that JesusChrist
- Page 67 and 68: II Corinthians 3:6 that "the letter
- Page 69 and 70: is to oppose and to repulsethat sec
- Page 71 and 72: Rightly Divided: Readings inBiblica
- Page 73 and 74: is necessary speaks volumesabout th
- Page 75 and 76: Guilt, Grace and Gratitude,Lectures
- Page 77 and 78:
76ted under the new? If it wererigh
- Page 79 and 80:
er to keep himself holy; forthe Sab
- Page 81 and 82:
there is room for both positionsin
- Page 83 and 84:
Dr. Gannett's eschatologyalso effec
- Page 85 and 86:
that, but man has a corrupt nature(
- Page 87 and 88:
the love of God is "universal"(p. 5
- Page 89 and 90:
ever, throughout the book thereis n