academic freedom.2) As l<strong>on</strong>g as <strong>the</strong>re is a process in place to assure that faculty authored textbooks are evaluated by an impartialcommittee <strong>of</strong> qualified c<strong>on</strong>tent experts, <strong>the</strong>re should be no prohibiti<strong>on</strong> against <strong>the</strong> adopti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> those texts for class.• One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> omissi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study was to examine <strong>the</strong> lower cost publishing alternatives as way <strong>of</strong> reducingcosts. One such alternatives would be to eliminate "hardback" books and <strong>on</strong>ly use paperback books moving to amore genertic look for <strong>the</strong> books. Using less expensive paper products to print <strong>the</strong> books <strong>on</strong> would also provide areducti<strong>on</strong> in publishing costs. Moving toward books that might not be resold (because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir cheap costs) butwould be recycled for <strong>the</strong>ir material c<strong>on</strong>tent would help put <strong>the</strong> emphasis <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> informati<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> book not itsappearance. The idea <strong>of</strong> using such expensive materials for books that for <strong>the</strong> most part do not become part <strong>of</strong> anindividuals reference library is simply wasteful and expensive. We are better <strong>of</strong>f to at least <strong>of</strong>fer <strong>the</strong>se "plainwrapper" books as an alternative to <strong>the</strong> high cost flashy <strong>on</strong>es to see what students prefer.• <strong>Textbook</strong> life can also be extended by producing updates as supplemental pamphlets with new informati<strong>on</strong> tocurrent editi<strong>on</strong>s, ra<strong>the</strong>r than publishing a whole new textbook.Virginia's law about faculty not being able to benefit financially from <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> a textbook is also reas<strong>on</strong>able.Not necessarily textbook related, but ano<strong>the</strong>r cost-savings to students might be realized by unbundling <strong>the</strong>research arms <strong>of</strong> universities from <strong>the</strong>ir teaching functi<strong>on</strong>. If university research is assumed to produce ec<strong>on</strong>omicbenefit, let <strong>the</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it <strong>of</strong> that research directly provide <strong>the</strong> income for c<strong>on</strong>tinuing research, or return that pr<strong>of</strong>it to <strong>the</strong>taxpayers who funded it in <strong>the</strong> first place. Mandate that student tuiti<strong>on</strong> and fees <strong>on</strong>ly pay for <strong>the</strong> teaching functi<strong>on</strong>and those fee-based activities in which a student CHOOSES to participate.• I manage a community college bookstore. I've never dealt with renting books but have talked with o<strong>the</strong>rmanagers who have d<strong>on</strong>e so. They say it is a lose, lose, situati<strong>on</strong>. My <strong>on</strong>ly thought is from dealing with studentsrenting calculators. It was also a lose, lose, situati<strong>on</strong> as many calculators never returned. If a student chose tocome back to school at a later date and I had <strong>the</strong>ir name <strong>on</strong> hold, <strong>the</strong> rent it would have cost <strong>the</strong>m to catch up from<strong>the</strong> time <strong>the</strong>y decided not to bring it back, was overwhelming and would have kept <strong>the</strong>m out <strong>of</strong> school.Ano<strong>the</strong>r thought is that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> loss taken when a new editi<strong>on</strong> comes into play, making <strong>the</strong> old <strong>on</strong>e obsolete and withno value whatsoever. A manager buys books based <strong>on</strong> history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> class. If history shows average enrollment <strong>of</strong>20, <strong>the</strong> books are bought and <strong>on</strong>ly 10 are rented, you've lost m<strong>on</strong>ey. So, you lose m<strong>on</strong>ey <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> 10 sitting <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>shelf, plus any that are not returned.I d<strong>on</strong>'t see it as a feasible or a quality educati<strong>on</strong>al move. My suggesti<strong>on</strong> is that <strong>the</strong> publishers quit addingsupplemental items that look free, call it a new editi<strong>on</strong> and raise <strong>the</strong> price. Nor should <strong>the</strong>y add a page in <strong>the</strong> indexarea, call it a new editi<strong>on</strong> and raise <strong>the</strong> price. I've compared editi<strong>on</strong>s and know that this is happening. If <strong>the</strong>re isn'tany new educati<strong>on</strong>al informati<strong>on</strong> added to <strong>the</strong> book, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>re shouldn't be new editi<strong>on</strong>s published. Technicalbooks probably are changing every 2 to 3 years, but history, geography, and like classes d<strong>on</strong>'t change that much.Especially classes covering eras <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> past. History is just what it says, history. If it didn't happen back <strong>the</strong>n, howin <strong>the</strong> world can a new editi<strong>on</strong> be made with more informati<strong>on</strong> about a history already printed.Just my thoughts.• Why not force instituti<strong>on</strong>s to buy back from <strong>the</strong>ir own students first before <strong>the</strong>y turn to wholesalers for <strong>the</strong>ir usedbook supply?Total Resp<strong>on</strong>ses: 8-126-
REFERENCE LISTAssociati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> American Publishers. 2005. Publishers Refute PIRG Asserti<strong>on</strong>s, ShowFlawed Data Used by Group to Make Claims. New York.Board <strong>of</strong> Governors for Higher Educati<strong>on</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Higher Educati<strong>on</strong> State <strong>of</strong>C<strong>on</strong>necticut. 2005. Special Act No. 04 – 3: An Act C<strong>on</strong>cerning Student <strong>Textbook</strong>Purchasing Policies. Hartford, C<strong>on</strong>necticut.CALPIRG. 2005. Rip<strong>of</strong>f 101: 2 nd Editi<strong>on</strong>: How <strong>the</strong> Publishing Industry’s PracticesNeedlessly Drive Up <strong>Textbook</strong> Costs. Washingt<strong>on</strong> D.C.Chaker, Anne Marie. September 28, 2006. Efforts Mount To Cut Costs Of <strong>Textbook</strong>s.The Wall Street Journal Online.College Board. 2006. Trends in College Pricing. New York, New York.Commissi<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> Government Forecasting and Accountability. February 2000. Internet Taxati<strong>on</strong>Issues and Impact. Springfield, Illinois.Hershman, Richard. 2006. Legislative Updates – <strong>Textbook</strong> Affordability. Nati<strong>on</strong>alAssociati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> College Stores. Oberlin, Ohio.Illinois Board <strong>of</strong> Higher Educati<strong>on</strong>, Student Advisory Committee. August 2005. <strong>Textbook</strong> AffordabilityRecommendati<strong>on</strong>s. Illinois.Koch, James V. 2006. An Ec<strong>on</strong>omic Analysis Of <strong>Textbook</strong> Pricing and <strong>Textbook</strong> Markets,Presented to <strong>the</strong> Advisory Committee <strong>on</strong> Student Financial Assistance.Washingt<strong>on</strong> D.C.Nati<strong>on</strong>al Associati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> College Stores. 2006. Legislative Update – <strong>Textbook</strong>Affordability 2006. Oberlin, Ohio.Nati<strong>on</strong>al Associati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> College Stores. 2006. NACS’ 2006 College Store IndustryFinancial <str<strong>on</strong>g>Report</str<strong>on</strong>g>. Oberlin, Ohio.Nati<strong>on</strong>al Associati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> College Stores. 2006. <strong>Textbook</strong> <strong>Rental</strong> Compendium. Oberlin,Ohio.Nati<strong>on</strong>al Retail Federati<strong>on</strong>. 2006. Back to College. Washingt<strong>on</strong>, D.C.Powers, Elia. September 20, 2006. “<strong>Textbook</strong>s, Barrier and Aid Forms.” Inside HigherEducati<strong>on</strong>.Reese, Mike. 2006. Hed<strong>on</strong>ic Quality Adjustment Methods for College <strong>Textbook</strong>s in <strong>the</strong>U.S. CPI. U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Labor, Bureau <strong>of</strong> Labor Statistics. Washingt<strong>on</strong>,D.C.Schroeder, Patricia S. September 19, 2006. Testim<strong>on</strong>y On Behalf Of The Associati<strong>on</strong> OfAmerican Publishers. Presented to <strong>the</strong> Advisory Committee <strong>on</strong> Student Financial-127-
- Page 1 and 2:
A Report on the Fe
- Page 3 and 4:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................
- Page 5 and 6:
Estimated Textbook Rental Cost Per
- Page 7 and 8:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYGrowing apprehensi
- Page 9 and 10:
• Faculty members, administrators
- Page 11 and 12:
ConclusionTextbook rental programs
- Page 13 and 14:
INTRODUCTIONAcross the nation, the
- Page 15 and 16:
increase in tuition and fees (7 per
- Page 17 and 18:
Source: Government Accountability O
- Page 19 and 20:
The IBHE’s 2006 survey found that
- Page 21 and 22:
ookstores, 17 percent to friends/re
- Page 23 and 24:
1. provide the option of purchasing
- Page 25 and 26:
Student fees are collected:• as p
- Page 27 and 28:
CURRENT ILLINOIS TEXTBOOK RENTAL PR
- Page 29 and 30:
MethodologyCOSTS AND FEASIBILITY OF
- Page 31 and 32:
Submitted cost data are presented b
- Page 33 and 34:
PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES - TEXTBOOK RENT
- Page 35 and 36:
Under a textbook rental program, ea
- Page 37 and 38:
FundingSR 692 directs the IBHE and
- Page 39 and 40:
have a separate series so that if a
- Page 41 and 42:
Impact on Tax Revenue.Property Tax.
- Page 43 and 44:
Textbook Selection. While acknowled
- Page 45 and 46:
According to the Student Monitor, i
- Page 47 and 48:
of the exact custom book. This alte
- Page 49 and 50:
Current Status of Voluntary Faculty
- Page 51 and 52:
APPENDICES-51-
- Page 53 and 54:
09400SR0692 Enrolled - 2 - LRB094 2
- Page 55 and 56:
APPENDIX BTextbook Study Timeline -
- Page 57 and 58:
Funding:1. Please provide an itemiz
- Page 59 and 60:
Textbook Survey - Third Party Books
- Page 61 and 62:
Estimated Annual Cost - Community C
- Page 63 and 64:
Estimated Annual Costs - Public Uni
- Page 65 and 66:
Estimated Textbook Rental Cost Per
- Page 67 and 68:
Kentucky. House Resolution 9 would
- Page 69 and 70:
Washington. House Bill 3034 would p
- Page 71 and 72:
materials to bookstores at wholesal
- Page 73 and 74:
ook wholesalers, stands this issue
- Page 75 and 76: items sold in a package and 2) facu
- Page 77 and 78: different printed text, an e-book o
- Page 79 and 80: • Page 20, #5 - Education of stud
- Page 81 and 82: -81-
- Page 83 and 84: -83-
- Page 85 and 86: -85-
- Page 87 and 88: -87-
- Page 89 and 90: -89-
- Page 91 and 92: -91-
- Page 93 and 94: -93-
- Page 95 and 96: -95-
- Page 97 and 98: -97-
- Page 99 and 100: -99-
- Page 101 and 102: -101-
- Page 103 and 104: Attn: Nicole Krneta Rogers-103-
- Page 105 and 106: Spring 2007: ISBN 0-618-75386-9 Rai
- Page 107 and 108: -107-
- Page 109 and 110: universities and the largest univer
- Page 111 and 112: separately and be stuck with any co
- Page 113 and 114: From: Wilcockson, Mark [mailto:M-Wi
- Page 115 and 116: supports informed decision making.
- Page 117 and 118: -117-
- Page 119 and 120: From: Brad O'Brien [mailto:bobrien@
- Page 121 and 122: more used books benefits both the b
- Page 123 and 124: From: Devi Prasad V.Potluri [mailto
- Page 125: Comments submitted on IBHE website: