13.07.2015 Views

A Report on the Feasibility of Textbook Rental - IBHE

A Report on the Feasibility of Textbook Rental - IBHE

A Report on the Feasibility of Textbook Rental - IBHE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

pricing model (see page 12).(www.immagic.com/eLibrary/ARCHIVES/GENERAL/IMM/I061215F.pdf)Pricing• For clarity, it is important to differentiate “new” vs. “used” textbook sales and pricing. Publishersand authors receive revenue <strong>on</strong>ly from <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>e time sale <strong>of</strong> new textbooks and course materials.All m<strong>on</strong>ey from <strong>the</strong> subsequent sale <strong>of</strong> used textbooks goes to <strong>the</strong> book wholesalers, bookstoresand <strong>on</strong>line sellers. Publishers’ risks are much higher than resellers – publishing is a competitivemarket and <strong>the</strong>re is no guarantee that faculty will adopt <strong>the</strong> materials developed by a publisher –and publishers must recoup <strong>the</strong>ir entire investment in a single sale. Bookstores have a guaranteedmarket for <strong>the</strong> course materials <strong>the</strong>y order because <strong>the</strong>y order <strong>on</strong>ly those materials that havealready been adopted by faculty. And, if <strong>the</strong> bookstores order too many new course materials<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> bookstores can return <strong>the</strong>m to <strong>the</strong> publisher. These statements are not intended todiminish <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> bookstores but to ensure understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> risk and return factorswithin <strong>the</strong> market.• Page 13, para. 1, line 1 – “…factors impact NEW textbook prices…”• Page 14, para. <strong>on</strong>e, line 6 “…75 cents <strong>of</strong> every NEW textbook dollar…”• The chart shown <strong>on</strong> page 14 should be labeled NEW textbook dollar distributi<strong>on</strong>. AAP alsosuggests that <strong>IBHE</strong> include <strong>the</strong> figure attached in Appendix B, which visually represents <strong>the</strong> salescycle for college textbooks.Bundling• Page 15, para. 1 – “…limits <strong>the</strong> ability to purchase used course materials and sell back all coursematerials in <strong>the</strong> bundled package.” – Some packaged items are designed for reuse, such as CDsthat accompany art texts and s<strong>of</strong>tware that is included with ec<strong>on</strong>omics texts. O<strong>the</strong>r materials,such as graded <strong>on</strong>line homework and <strong>on</strong>line tutoring, are purchased as c<strong>on</strong>sumable products foruse for a specific period <strong>of</strong> time, such as <strong>on</strong>e, two or three semesters. Publishers do sell productssuch as access codes and workbooks a la carte so that bookstores can sell <strong>the</strong>m with usedtextbooks.• Page 15, para. 2 – “CALPIRG…reports bundled textbooks and course materials account for half<strong>of</strong> all textbook sales.” – AAP sales data directly c<strong>on</strong>tradicts CalPIRG’s asserti<strong>on</strong> about bundledtextbooks. CalPIRG’s “study” was based <strong>on</strong> 50 textbooks – five each from 10 differentbookstores – out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> more than 262,000 titles currently <strong>on</strong> sale. According to AAP data, asreported by <strong>the</strong> six major textbook publishers for 2004-05, <strong>on</strong>ly 37% <strong>of</strong> all net print product salesare packaged products. See Appendix C.• Page 15, para. 3 – “CALPIRG reports that students did not have <strong>the</strong> opti<strong>on</strong> to purchase unbundledmaterials for 55 percent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bundled textbooks studied in <strong>the</strong>ir survey.” Again, CalPIRG’sasserti<strong>on</strong> is based <strong>on</strong> 50 textbooks and <strong>on</strong>e can assume that <strong>the</strong> bookstores visited did not <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>the</strong> packaged materials a la carte because <strong>the</strong>y were not adopted or ordered in that fashi<strong>on</strong>.• Page 15, para. 3 – “An Illinois community college reports it was seldom <strong>of</strong>fered a choice frompublishers to order bundled items separately.” – If a faculty member or department adopted atextbook package because it better ensured that students obtained all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> necessary coursematerials <strong>the</strong>n publishers would abide by that adopti<strong>on</strong>. However, publishers do generally <strong>of</strong>fersupplemental materials that can be used in c<strong>on</strong>juncti<strong>on</strong> with used books.New Editi<strong>on</strong>s• Page 16, para. 1 – “New editi<strong>on</strong> adopti<strong>on</strong>s increase student costs because new textbooks are morecostly than used textbooks.” – As a blanket statement this is incorrect. New editi<strong>on</strong>s adopti<strong>on</strong>s d<strong>on</strong>ot automatically increase student costs. A faculty member could choose a new editi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> a-76-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!