“But now let’s assume <strong>the</strong> first semester students sell <strong>the</strong>ir textbooks back to <strong>the</strong> bookstore at <strong>the</strong>end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> semester. The bookstore may buy <strong>the</strong>m for $20 and sell <strong>the</strong>m as used books for $70each. The textbook publisher sells <strong>on</strong>ly 250 copies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> text, but still has <strong>the</strong> fixed costs <strong>of</strong>$50,000. It must now spread this $50,000 over <strong>on</strong>ly 250 texts. Thus, just <strong>the</strong> fixed cost price <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> text has jumped to $200. Even selling it at cost to <strong>the</strong> bookstore means <strong>the</strong> bookstore will sellit to <strong>the</strong> student at $267. This assumes a c<strong>on</strong>servative 25% markup by <strong>the</strong> bookstore.“Now we can see what is happening. The expansi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> used textbook market has c<strong>on</strong>tributedsignificantly to <strong>the</strong> increase in <strong>the</strong> price <strong>of</strong> new textbooks. While students think <strong>the</strong>y are “saving”m<strong>on</strong>ey by selling <strong>the</strong>ir texts and/or buying used texts <strong>the</strong>y are, in fact, making <strong>the</strong> problemworse.”This is not a matter <strong>of</strong> pointing fingers but <strong>of</strong> perspective. Follett is a used book dealer and makes greaterpr<strong>of</strong>its <strong>on</strong> used books than <strong>on</strong> new books and, as would be expected, supports practices that increase <strong>the</strong>sale <strong>of</strong> used books. Publishers have fixed costs that can be recovered solely through <strong>the</strong> sale <strong>of</strong> newcourse materials so, <strong>of</strong> course, <strong>the</strong>y are supportive <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sale <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir new products.LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVES ON TEXTBOOK COSTSC<strong>on</strong>necticut• Page 19, para. 1 – The recap <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> C<strong>on</strong>necticut law is incorrect. House Bill 5527 requirespublishers to make <strong>the</strong> wholesale price <strong>of</strong> products available to faculty. Publishers cannotprovide <strong>the</strong> price <strong>of</strong> course materials at <strong>the</strong> bookstore, as bookstores markup publisher productsdifferently.Virginia• Page 20, para. 1 – The law does not say “employees…may not benefit financially from <strong>the</strong>selecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> required textbooks.” It stipulates that “No employee at a Virginia public college oruniversity shall demand or receive any payment, loan, subscripti<strong>on</strong>, advance, deposit <strong>of</strong> m<strong>on</strong>ey,services or anything, present or promised, as an inducement for requiring students to purchase aspecific textbook required for coursework or instructi<strong>on</strong>; with <strong>the</strong> excepti<strong>on</strong> that <strong>the</strong> employeemay receive (i) sample copies, instructor's copies, or instructi<strong>on</strong>al material, not to be sold; and(ii) royalties or o<strong>the</strong>r compensati<strong>on</strong> from sales <strong>of</strong> textbooks that include such instructor's ownwriting or work. Please note <strong>the</strong> stipulati<strong>on</strong> that sample texts are not to be sold. The sale <strong>of</strong>samples is an insidious process that increases <strong>the</strong> price <strong>of</strong> textbooks.• Page 20, #2, – The law does not say that textbooks must be made available separately from o<strong>the</strong>rmaterials. The Virginia guidelines state, “If <strong>the</strong> faculty member does not intend to use each itemin <strong>the</strong> bundled package, he shall notify <strong>the</strong> bookstore, and <strong>the</strong> bookstore shall order <strong>the</strong>individualized items when <strong>the</strong>ir procurement is cost effective for both instituti<strong>on</strong>s and studentsand such items are made available by <strong>the</strong> publisher.”• Page 20, #5 – House Bill 1478 does not require sample copies be available. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, it states,“provisi<strong>on</strong>s for <strong>the</strong> availability <strong>of</strong> required textbooks to students o<strong>the</strong>rwise unable to afford <strong>the</strong>cost.”Washingt<strong>on</strong>• Page 20, para 1 – “The five primary provisi<strong>on</strong>s…are.” -- For clarity, we suggest you change thisto read: “The five primary provisi<strong>on</strong>s, which apply <strong>on</strong>ly to bookstores, are:”• Page 20, #2 – This requirement is obsolete because differences between editi<strong>on</strong>s are already listedin <strong>the</strong> foreword <strong>of</strong> textbooks.-78-
• Page 20, #5 – Educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> students still remains paramount. No. 5 is applicable <strong>on</strong>ly when“educati<strong>on</strong>al c<strong>on</strong>tent is comparable.”TEXTBOOK RENTAL PROGRAMS<strong>Rental</strong> Program Benefits• Page 23, paragraph 1: “…rental programs are significant.” -- We suggest this be changed toread: “rental programs CAN BE significant.”Envir<strong>on</strong>mentally Resp<strong>on</strong>sible• Page 23 – <strong>Rental</strong> programs do not ensure that fewer copies <strong>of</strong> textbooks will be printed.Faculty C<strong>on</strong>cerns About Adopti<strong>on</strong> Periods• Page 24 – The use <strong>of</strong> supplementary materials should play a larger role in this assessment <strong>of</strong>rental programs. Eighty-six percent <strong>of</strong> faculty ei<strong>the</strong>r require or recommend that students usesupplementary materials, according to Zogby Internati<strong>on</strong>al’s poll <strong>of</strong> faculty in September 2006.The cost <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se materials should be factored into any estimated rental program costs.COST SAVING ALTERNATIVES TO TEXTBOOK RENTAL PROGRAMSBook Buy-Back Programs, page 39• Book buy-back programs can reduce <strong>the</strong> cost <strong>of</strong> textbooks for students in <strong>the</strong> near term. It isimportant to note that <strong>the</strong> fixed costs associated with textbook development must be spreadacross <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> products sold. With more used textbooks <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> market, fewer newtextbooks will be sold, which will eventually require publishers to raise <strong>the</strong> price <strong>of</strong> texts tocover costs and make a reas<strong>on</strong>able pr<strong>of</strong>it.• Bookstores typically markup used books around 50 percent and make a higher margin <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it<strong>on</strong> used books than <strong>on</strong> new books.• New editi<strong>on</strong>s do not automatically foreclose <strong>the</strong> ability <strong>of</strong> students to sell back textbooks. Asseen <strong>on</strong> MBS’ website, used book wholesalers will purchase old editi<strong>on</strong>s if faculty adopt <strong>the</strong>m.“Old editi<strong>on</strong>s, dropped adopti<strong>on</strong>s, and low-value titles d<strong>on</strong>'t have to be a nuisance duringbuyback time. If you're signed up for MBS Custom Buyback and we find late-breaking nati<strong>on</strong>aldemand for previously unlisted or "problem" titles, we'll price <strong>the</strong>m accordingly so you d<strong>on</strong>'thave to turn <strong>the</strong>m away.”Polices for Administrati<strong>on</strong> and Faculty MembersReserves, page 40• If libraries were forced to have all textbooks <strong>on</strong> reserve, <strong>the</strong> fiscal burden <strong>on</strong> instituti<strong>on</strong>s would beheavy. Libraries would be resp<strong>on</strong>sible for <strong>the</strong> storage, cataloguing and care <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se books,increasing staffing costs and storage needs. Librarians are typically opposed to any attempt tomandate <strong>the</strong>ir resp<strong>on</strong>sibility for textbooks.Public list, page 40• Publishers already make available a list <strong>of</strong> changes between editi<strong>on</strong>s, both <strong>on</strong>line and in <strong>the</strong>foreword <strong>of</strong> texts.Policies for PublishersComplimentary Copies, page 41• As stated above, publishers cannot be required to provide free sample copies.-79-