David E. Anderson, J <strong>Vaccines</strong> Vaccin <strong>2013</strong>, 4:5http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2157-7560.S1.0163 rd International Conference on<strong>Vaccines</strong> & VaccinationJuly 29-31, <strong>2013</strong> Embassy Suites Las Vegas, NV, USAPotent neutralizing antibodies against CMV infection of both fibroblast and epithelial cellinfection induced using a multivalent eVLP vaccine candidateDavid E. AndersonVBI <strong>Vaccines</strong>, USABackground: A prophylactic vaccine to prevent congenital transmission of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the highest public healthvaccine priority for which a vaccine is currently lacking. Several lines of evidence demonstrate that neutralizing antibodies againstCMV confer significant efficacy, of which gB is a major target. However, one shortcoming of past vaccines that targeted only thegB glycoprotein was a failure to induce high titer neutralizing antibody responses that could prevent infection of epithelial cells;live attenuated and adjuvanted recombinant gB vaccines tested in clinical trials induced titers approximately 20-fold below levelsassociated with natural immunity.Methods: Using an enveloped virus-like-particle (eVLP) technology in which particles are produced in vitro after expressionof MLV Gag protein, we have developed a multivalent vaccine that targets the gB protein as well as the gH protein, part of apentameric complex associated with epithelial cell entry. The eVLPs can be produced in a variety of mammalian cell types, withcurrent production in a GMP-suitable CHO cell line.Results: Electron microscopy (negative staining and immunogold surface labeling) after tangential flow filtration and anionexchange chromatography has confirmed particle structure after purification and surface antigen localization, with antigendensity quantified by ELISA. Immunization of balb/c mice with recombinant gB or the same dose of gB presented in eVLPsdemonstrates much stronger (~10X) neutralizing antibody responses induced with the eVLPs, which is associated with a strongTh1 response. Immunization of rabbits with our clinical candidate, comprised of gB and gH eVLPs absorbed to alum, hasdemonstrated significant neutralizing antibody responses within 2 weeks of the first immunization; titers 2 weeks after the secondimmunization are greater or comparable to that of natural immunity in fibroblast and epithelial cells, respectively.Conclusions: Combined use of eVLP delivery and CMV antigens in addition to gB represents a potent and safe approach to CMVvaccine development.BiographyDavid E. Anderson is a co-founder of VBI <strong>Vaccines</strong>, a vaccine development company dedicated to innovative formulation, development & delivery ofvaccines that expand coverage and enhance protection in both established and emerging markets. He currently serves as Vice President, Research,and is actively involved in management of preclinical research efforts and for building and protecting VBI’s intellectual property. Prior to joining VBI,He served as a consultant to the company while directing academic research as an Assistant Professor at Harvard Medical School. At Harvard, hedeveloped a multi-disciplinary research program focused on elucidating mechanisms by which infl ammation is regulated within the central nervoussystem, with relevance to a variety of human neurodegenerative diseases, including brain tumors, multiple sclerosis, and Alzheimer’s disease. Heis a highly published investigator, appearing as primary author on studies appearing in the most prestigious scientifi c journals, including Nature andScience. He has been invited to give lectures at international conferences in the United States and abroad. He completed his undergraduate studiesat the University of California, Davis and received a Ph.D. in Immunology from Harvard University.danderson@variationbiotech.comJ <strong>Vaccines</strong> Vaccin <strong>2013</strong>ISSN: 2157-7560, JVV an open access journal<strong>Vaccines</strong>-<strong>2013</strong>July 29-31, <strong>2013</strong>Volume 4 Issue 5Page 68
Saroj Basak, J <strong>Vaccines</strong> Vaccin <strong>2013</strong>, 4:5http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2157-7560.S1.0163 rd International Conference on<strong>Vaccines</strong> & VaccinationJuly 29-31, <strong>2013</strong> Embassy Suites Las Vegas, NV, USAIntratumoral heterogeneity and identification of tumor initiating cells (tic) for cancervaccinationSaroj BasakUniversity of California, USACancer vaccination strategies require vaccination against cancer antigens that are expressed on tumor cells. However, withthe recognition that most cancer consists of heterogeneous tumor cells that expresses different markers and antigens duringcancer progression it has become imperative to identify the tumor cells that are responsible for cancer initiation and progressionand target these cells for effective vaccination against cancer. These cells are also known as Tumor Initiating Cells (TIC) or CancerStem Cells (CSC) and our laboratory is involved in identifying these cells and developing immunotherapy strategy against themfor cancer vaccination.Our studies with advance stage lung cancer bio-specimens from Malignant Pleural Effusion (MPE) patients have indicatedthat tumor cell heterogeneity exists in terms of cell surface markers expression (CD44, CD166, cMET, MDR1, uPAR) andmolecular markers associated with TIC/CSC (BMI-1, hTERT, EZH2, OCT-4). These primary tumor cells express the CD44surface marker on most of the tumor cells (75-95%). However, the intensity of CD44 surface marker expression varies andcells can be identified and sorted as high CD44 (CD44 hi) and low CD44 (CD44 lo) expressing cells. The CD44 hicells are moreefficient in forming soft agar colonies (1.5-2.5 times), are more tumorigenic in NOD/SCID (IL-2 null) mice and express high levelof specific TIC/CSC molecular markers than CD44 locells. The CD44 hicells have significantly lower miR-34a than CD44 locellsand introduction of miR-34a resulted in 80-95% reduction of soft agar colonies. The cells were also evaluated for adenoviral entryreceptors (CAR, avb3, avb5) for consideration of targeted gene-therapy. Remarkably, over 80% of the CD44 cells co-express CARand av5, but not av3. These cells undergo apoptosis by UV radiation and can also be efficiently loaded on human dendritic cells(DC) for efficient delivery to the immune system.BiographySaroj Basak is involved with vaccination research and translational cancer therapy at UCLA. His research works involve development ofimmunotherapy and gene therapy strategies against cancer using viral vectors (adenovirus, helper-dependent adenovirus, lentivirus) and dendriticcells mediated immunotherapy. He has numerous publications and has received several grants for improvement of vaccination strategies for cancer.He is an expert in pre clinical studies; animal model development using primary cancer cells, dendritic cells mediated vaccination and therapy.Currently his laboratory is involved with identifying and characterizing cancer initiating cells and development of targeted therapy and vaccinationstrategies against these cells. His laboratory is also involved in evaluating the effect of biologics and natural products in overcoming drug resistancein cancer.sbasak@mednet.ucla.eduJ <strong>Vaccines</strong> Vaccin <strong>2013</strong>ISSN: 2157-7560, JVV an open access journal<strong>Vaccines</strong>-<strong>2013</strong>July 29-31, <strong>2013</strong>Volume 4 Issue 5Page 69
- Page 1 and 2:
111 th OMICS Group ConferenceJuly 2
- Page 3 and 4:
Medical SciencesISSNAddiction Resea
- Page 5 and 6:
Impact Factors (IF) and Index Coper
- Page 7 and 8:
111 th OMICS Group Conference3 rd I
- Page 9 and 10:
Journal of Clinical & Cellular Immu
- Page 11 and 12:
111 th OMICS Group Conference3 rd I
- Page 13 and 14:
111 th OMICS Group Conference3 rd I
- Page 15 and 16:
Clinical Microbiology-2013OMICS Gro
- Page 17 and 18: Immunology Summit-2013OMICS Group i
- Page 19 and 20: Probiotics-2013OMICS Group is organ
- Page 21 and 22: Virology-2013OMICS Group is organiz
- Page 23 and 24: 111 th OMICS Group Conference3 rd I
- Page 25 and 26: Because of heightened awareness of
- Page 27 and 28: 111 th OMICS Group Conference3 rd I
- Page 29 and 30: 111 th OMICS Group Conference3 rd I
- Page 31 and 32: 111 th OMICS Group Conference3 rd I
- Page 33 and 34: Ara Hovanessian, J Vaccines Vaccin
- Page 35 and 36: Nikolai Petrovsky, J Vaccines Vacci
- Page 37 and 38: 111 th OMICS Group Conference3 rd I
- Page 39 and 40: Robert E. Sievers et al., J Vaccine
- Page 41 and 42: Xiao-Qing Wei, J Vaccines Vaccin 20
- Page 43 and 44: Campbell Bunce, J Vaccines Vaccin 2
- Page 45 and 46: Hong Xin, J Vaccines Vaccin 2013, 4
- Page 47 and 48: Diane Longo et al., J Vaccines Vacc
- Page 49 and 50: Track 33: Novel Approaches in Desig
- Page 51 and 52: Takashi Kei Kishimoto, J Vaccines V
- Page 53 and 54: Benjamin Petsch, J Vaccines Vaccin
- Page 55 and 56: A. Bennett Jenson et al., J Vaccine
- Page 57 and 58: Milan Raska et al., J Vaccines Vacc
- Page 59 and 60: Muhammad Ali A. Shah et al., J Vacc
- Page 61 and 62: Track 44: Vaccines against Infectio
- Page 63 and 64: Haval Shirwan, J Vaccines Vaccin 20
- Page 65 and 66: Rainer Fischer, J Vaccines Vaccin 2
- Page 67: Alwyn Rapose, J Vaccines Vaccin 201
- Page 71 and 72: Gisela Gonzalez, J Vaccines Vaccin
- Page 73 and 74: Young Research ForumSession ChairPe
- Page 75 and 76: Humberto Hernandez et al., J Vaccin
- Page 77 and 78: Nisha Nair et al., J Vaccines Vacci
- Page 79 and 80: Leow Yee et al., J Vaccines Vaccin
- Page 81 and 82: Kaissar Tabynov et al., J Vaccines
- Page 83 and 84: Teena Mohan et al., J Vaccines Vacc
- Page 85 and 86: Track 5 & 95: Manufacturing, Produc
- Page 87 and 88: Graham Clarke, J Vaccines Vaccin 20
- Page 89 and 90: Obradovic Zarema et al., J Vaccines
- Page 91 and 92: Abdur Razzaque Sarker et al., J Vac
- Page 93 and 94: Omer Qutaiba B. Al-lela et al., J V
- Page 95 and 96: 111 th OMICS Group Conference3 rd I
- Page 97 and 98: Regina Heidenreich et al., J Vaccin
- Page 99 and 100: Leow Y et al., J Vaccines Vaccin 20
- Page 101 and 102: Zafer Kurugol et al., J Vaccines Va
- Page 103 and 104: Ates Kara et al., J Vaccines Vaccin
- Page 105 and 106: Yurong Tan et al., J Vaccines Vacci
- Page 107 and 108: Deryabin P.N. et al., J Vaccines Va
- Page 109 and 110: Xiao-Yong Fan et al., J Vaccines Va
- Page 111 and 112: Byung Chul Kim et al., J Vaccines V
- Page 113 and 114: STS. Chitradevi et al., J Vaccines
- Page 115 and 116: Yan Liang et al., J Vaccines Vaccin
- Page 117 and 118: 111 th OMICS Group Conference3 rd I
- Page 119 and 120:
Afshineh Latifynia et al., J Vaccin
- Page 121 and 122:
Hemanta Koley et al., J Vaccines Va
- Page 123 and 124:
Aleksandar Masic et al., J Vaccines
- Page 125 and 126:
Hassen Mamo, J Vaccines Vaccin 2013
- Page 127 and 128:
Oladipo Aina et al., J Vaccines Vac
- Page 129 and 130:
Aiswariya Chidambaram, J Vaccines V
- Page 131 and 132:
Birhanu Hurisa et al., J Vaccines V
- Page 133 and 134:
Ghaffarifar F et al., J Vaccines Va
- Page 135 and 136:
Mathan Periasamy et al., J Vaccines
- Page 137 and 138:
Rania Abdel Hay, J Vaccines Vaccin
- Page 139 and 140:
Samuel Teshome, J Vaccines Vaccin 2
- Page 141 and 142:
111 th OMICS Group Conference3 rd I
- Page 143 and 144:
Birhanu Hurisa et al., J Vaccines V
- Page 145 and 146:
Dhrubajyoti Nag, J Vaccines Vaccin
- Page 147 and 148:
Belachew Etana et al., J Vaccines V
- Page 149 and 150:
Fatemeh Ghaffarifar et al., J Vacci
- Page 151 and 152:
Moustafa A.F. Abbas et al., J Vacci
- Page 153 and 154:
Prerna Chaudhary, J Vaccines Vaccin
- Page 155 and 156:
Sandeepkumar R. Chauhan et al., J V
- Page 157 and 158:
Veronica Rainone et al., J Vaccines
- Page 159 and 160:
Page 159
- Page 161 and 162:
Previous111 th OMICS Group Conferen
- Page 163 and 164:
PreviousWorld Congress and Expo onB