Timothy Lee, J <strong>Vaccines</strong> Vaccin <strong>2013</strong>, 4:5http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2157-7560.S1.0163 rd International Conference on<strong>Vaccines</strong> & VaccinationJuly 29-31, <strong>2013</strong> Embassy Suites Las Vegas, NV, USAChallenges and exciting solutions to downstream bioprocessing operations for themanufacturing of therapeutic vaccine candidatesTimothy LeeLatham Biopharm, USAThe cultivation and fermentation processing using fed-batch fermentation or perfusion is rather inexpensive in deliveringhigh yields of target proteins. However, the downstream processing for the recovery and purification of the proteins canbe challenging. This presentation summarizes the systematic methodology for the clarification of bacterial and viral vaccineproteins. The methodology pertains to the clarification of vaccine proteins that are extracellular (i.e. viral or bacterial product)or intracellular (i.e. bacterial soluble protein or inclusion body). The methodology was established based on data related toprocess economics, recovery and purity of the clarified material prior to downstream column purification. Based on the analysis,we have found that the initial step of clarification after fermentation should be centrifugation. This centrifugation step servesto separate the protein of interest from cells, if the product of interest is extracellular, or to concentrate the cells to an opticaldensity for homogenization, if the product of interest is intracellular. In the case of an extracellular protein, a final ultrafiltrationstep is usually performed to concentrate and condition the product before column purification. In the case of proteins thatare intracellularly expressed, the clarification of soluble protein is best recovered, after homogenization, using microfiltrationfollowed by a final ultrafiltration step to concentrate and condition the protein prior to column chromatography. The clarificationof inclusion body is best recovered and purified using centrifugation where the centrifugation helps facilitate better separation ofthe denser inclusion body particles from the lighter cellular debris. In addition, other methods such as a direct capture step (i.e.modified suspended bed chromatography) were economical in proteins as it reduced additional downstream columns due to itsselectivity. Other membrane technologies (Q, HIC, His) are discussed in their ability to reduce column chromatography stepsdownstream for improve recovery, purity and cost.BiographyTimothy Lee received his Ph.D. in Biochemical Engineering. The area of research was focused on the mechanical and catalytic stability of immobilizedenzymes. He then did a post-doctoral fellowship at Sanofi pasteur, Canada, where he was involved in the optimization of primary recovery processesfor bacterial systems, mainly focusing on micro-fi ltration, centrifugal and chromatographic separations. As a senior development scientist withinsanofi pasteur, He has played a key role in the development of different bacterial media, fermentation and purifi cation optimization and scale-upas well as the transfer of processes to Industrial operations for manufacturing and externally to CMOs. He has also published many patents andscientifi c papers and has presented extensively, globally, over the last several years, outlining the work performed in the industry. As a director ofbulk manufacturing and operations, he was involved extensively in cGMP commercial manufacturing, facility qualifi cation, process validation andcontinuous improvement initiatives for the global organization utilizing lean six sigma training for the biopharmaceutical industry. He is currently aSenior Scientifi c Consultant for Latham Biopharm <strong>Group</strong> specializing in CMC and winning of government contracts and continues to interact withvendors to fi nd new technologies to improve and simplify the industrial operation for the manufacture of vaccines.tlee@lathambiopharm.com, timswlee@gmail.comJ <strong>Vaccines</strong> Vaccin <strong>2013</strong>ISSN: 2157-7560, JVV an open access journal<strong>Vaccines</strong>-<strong>2013</strong>July 29-31, <strong>2013</strong>Volume 4 Issue 5Page 86
Graham Clarke, J <strong>Vaccines</strong> Vaccin <strong>2013</strong>, 4:5http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2157-7560.S1.0163 rd International Conference on<strong>Vaccines</strong> & VaccinationJuly 29-31, <strong>2013</strong> Embassy Suites Las Vegas, NV, USADevelopment of a broad spectrum vaccine against invasive meningococcal diseaseGraham ClarkeImmunoBiology Ltd (“ImmBio”), UKNeisseria meningitidis is the major causative agent of invasive meningococcal disease. With very fast progression leading tohigh mortality and morbidity rates, therapeutic intervention can be too slow. Consequently prevention is highly desirable,especially in the high risk infant and adolescent groups. The wide strain variation has been a major challenge for vaccine design.Current polysaccharide conjugate vaccines are serogroup specific. Within the B serogroup, there are a number of serosubtypesand the use of the pathogen’s B polysaccharide is inefficient, due to its occurrence in human brain tissue.ImmBio, a vaccine developer based in Cambridge UK, is developing a new class of vaccines. The technology, termedImmBioVax, in essence mimics ex vivo the innate responses’ impact on the target pathogen. This generates a multi-proteinvaccine. It is self targeting and does not require the addition of an adjuvant, as these functions are performed by constitutiveproteins.The candidate vaccine against invasive meningococcal disease, named MenBioVax, generates strong bactericidal antibodyresponses (SBA) across all the B serosubtypes tested, unlike other candidates, as well as across other serogroups, including A, C,W and Y. Thus it has the potential to both extend protection across B and replace other vaccines, in a single product.Given the clinical and regulatory importance of having a well controlled, consistent and scalable production process,ImmBio has developed a range of steps and assays to establish an appropriate process, ahead of initiating human clinical studies,which will be presented.BiographyGraham Clarke has a master’s degree in Biophysics from King’s College, London and an MBA. Working fi rst in “big Pharma” then as a partner inthe Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Practice of PA Consulting, he returned to industry as VP, Strategic Product Management, SmithKline Beecham,then Head of Executive Decision Support, GSK R&D and most recently VP, Strategy & Business Development, GE Healthcare Biosciences.Graham joined the Board of ImmunoBiology as a non-executive director soon after its formation and was subsequently appointed as its CEO in 2006.graham.clarke@immbio.comJ <strong>Vaccines</strong> Vaccin <strong>2013</strong>ISSN: 2157-7560, JVV an open access journal<strong>Vaccines</strong>-<strong>2013</strong>July 29-31, <strong>2013</strong>Volume 4 Issue 5Page 87
- Page 1 and 2:
111 th OMICS Group ConferenceJuly 2
- Page 3 and 4:
Medical SciencesISSNAddiction Resea
- Page 5 and 6:
Impact Factors (IF) and Index Coper
- Page 7 and 8:
111 th OMICS Group Conference3 rd I
- Page 9 and 10:
Journal of Clinical & Cellular Immu
- Page 11 and 12:
111 th OMICS Group Conference3 rd I
- Page 13 and 14:
111 th OMICS Group Conference3 rd I
- Page 15 and 16:
Clinical Microbiology-2013OMICS Gro
- Page 17 and 18:
Immunology Summit-2013OMICS Group i
- Page 19 and 20:
Probiotics-2013OMICS Group is organ
- Page 21 and 22:
Virology-2013OMICS Group is organiz
- Page 23 and 24:
111 th OMICS Group Conference3 rd I
- Page 25 and 26:
Because of heightened awareness of
- Page 27 and 28:
111 th OMICS Group Conference3 rd I
- Page 29 and 30:
111 th OMICS Group Conference3 rd I
- Page 31 and 32:
111 th OMICS Group Conference3 rd I
- Page 33 and 34:
Ara Hovanessian, J Vaccines Vaccin
- Page 35 and 36: Nikolai Petrovsky, J Vaccines Vacci
- Page 37 and 38: 111 th OMICS Group Conference3 rd I
- Page 39 and 40: Robert E. Sievers et al., J Vaccine
- Page 41 and 42: Xiao-Qing Wei, J Vaccines Vaccin 20
- Page 43 and 44: Campbell Bunce, J Vaccines Vaccin 2
- Page 45 and 46: Hong Xin, J Vaccines Vaccin 2013, 4
- Page 47 and 48: Diane Longo et al., J Vaccines Vacc
- Page 49 and 50: Track 33: Novel Approaches in Desig
- Page 51 and 52: Takashi Kei Kishimoto, J Vaccines V
- Page 53 and 54: Benjamin Petsch, J Vaccines Vaccin
- Page 55 and 56: A. Bennett Jenson et al., J Vaccine
- Page 57 and 58: Milan Raska et al., J Vaccines Vacc
- Page 59 and 60: Muhammad Ali A. Shah et al., J Vacc
- Page 61 and 62: Track 44: Vaccines against Infectio
- Page 63 and 64: Haval Shirwan, J Vaccines Vaccin 20
- Page 65 and 66: Rainer Fischer, J Vaccines Vaccin 2
- Page 67 and 68: Alwyn Rapose, J Vaccines Vaccin 201
- Page 69 and 70: Saroj Basak, J Vaccines Vaccin 2013
- Page 71 and 72: Gisela Gonzalez, J Vaccines Vaccin
- Page 73 and 74: Young Research ForumSession ChairPe
- Page 75 and 76: Humberto Hernandez et al., J Vaccin
- Page 77 and 78: Nisha Nair et al., J Vaccines Vacci
- Page 79 and 80: Leow Yee et al., J Vaccines Vaccin
- Page 81 and 82: Kaissar Tabynov et al., J Vaccines
- Page 83 and 84: Teena Mohan et al., J Vaccines Vacc
- Page 85: Track 5 & 95: Manufacturing, Produc
- Page 89 and 90: Obradovic Zarema et al., J Vaccines
- Page 91 and 92: Abdur Razzaque Sarker et al., J Vac
- Page 93 and 94: Omer Qutaiba B. Al-lela et al., J V
- Page 95 and 96: 111 th OMICS Group Conference3 rd I
- Page 97 and 98: Regina Heidenreich et al., J Vaccin
- Page 99 and 100: Leow Y et al., J Vaccines Vaccin 20
- Page 101 and 102: Zafer Kurugol et al., J Vaccines Va
- Page 103 and 104: Ates Kara et al., J Vaccines Vaccin
- Page 105 and 106: Yurong Tan et al., J Vaccines Vacci
- Page 107 and 108: Deryabin P.N. et al., J Vaccines Va
- Page 109 and 110: Xiao-Yong Fan et al., J Vaccines Va
- Page 111 and 112: Byung Chul Kim et al., J Vaccines V
- Page 113 and 114: STS. Chitradevi et al., J Vaccines
- Page 115 and 116: Yan Liang et al., J Vaccines Vaccin
- Page 117 and 118: 111 th OMICS Group Conference3 rd I
- Page 119 and 120: Afshineh Latifynia et al., J Vaccin
- Page 121 and 122: Hemanta Koley et al., J Vaccines Va
- Page 123 and 124: Aleksandar Masic et al., J Vaccines
- Page 125 and 126: Hassen Mamo, J Vaccines Vaccin 2013
- Page 127 and 128: Oladipo Aina et al., J Vaccines Vac
- Page 129 and 130: Aiswariya Chidambaram, J Vaccines V
- Page 131 and 132: Birhanu Hurisa et al., J Vaccines V
- Page 133 and 134: Ghaffarifar F et al., J Vaccines Va
- Page 135 and 136: Mathan Periasamy et al., J Vaccines
- Page 137 and 138:
Rania Abdel Hay, J Vaccines Vaccin
- Page 139 and 140:
Samuel Teshome, J Vaccines Vaccin 2
- Page 141 and 142:
111 th OMICS Group Conference3 rd I
- Page 143 and 144:
Birhanu Hurisa et al., J Vaccines V
- Page 145 and 146:
Dhrubajyoti Nag, J Vaccines Vaccin
- Page 147 and 148:
Belachew Etana et al., J Vaccines V
- Page 149 and 150:
Fatemeh Ghaffarifar et al., J Vacci
- Page 151 and 152:
Moustafa A.F. Abbas et al., J Vacci
- Page 153 and 154:
Prerna Chaudhary, J Vaccines Vaccin
- Page 155 and 156:
Sandeepkumar R. Chauhan et al., J V
- Page 157 and 158:
Veronica Rainone et al., J Vaccines
- Page 159 and 160:
Page 159
- Page 161 and 162:
Previous111 th OMICS Group Conferen
- Page 163 and 164:
PreviousWorld Congress and Expo onB