13.07.2015 Views

Bush__The_Essential_Physics_for_Medical_Imaging - Biomedical ...

Bush__The_Essential_Physics_for_Medical_Imaging - Biomedical ...

Bush__The_Essential_Physics_for_Medical_Imaging - Biomedical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

isks. <strong>The</strong> International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) estimates therisk of fatal cancer <strong>for</strong> exposures to adults of working age to be 4 X 10- 2 deaths per Sv(4 X 10-4 per rem). This translates to 1 cancer death per 2,500 people receiving aneffective dose of 10 mSv (1 rem). Because of the linear, no-threshold assumption usedin risk estimates, risk is presumed to be proportional to the effective dose. For example,there would be a 1 in 25,000 chance that a fatal cancer would result from an effectivedose of 1 mSv (0.1 rem), or a 1 in 500 chance of a fatal cancer from an effectivedose of 50 mSv (5 rem). <strong>The</strong> ICRP estimates the risk to be two or three times higher<strong>for</strong> infants and children, and substantially lower <strong>for</strong> adults older than 50 years of age(see later discussion of radiation-induced cancer risk, Chapter 25.6).In addition to understanding the risk per unit effective dose, a working knowledgeof the typical dose levels or effective doses <strong>for</strong> various common radiologic proceduresis useful. Table 24-3 is a compilation of typical organ doses and effective doses <strong>for</strong> avariety of diagnostic imaging procedures. Table 24-4 contains results from a study ofpatient radiation doses resulting from interventional radiologic procedures.TABLE 24·4. RANGE OF FLUOROSCOPY SCREENING TIME, FLUOROSCOPY ANDRADIOGRAPHY DOSE·AREA PRODUCT VALUES, AND MEAN EFFECTIVE DOSEFOR SELECTED INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURESDose-area product (Gy-cm 2 )" MeanFluoroscopyeffectiveInterventional screening doseprocedures time (min) Fluoroscopy Radiography (mSv)"DiagnosticAV fistula angiography 1.4-3.8 0.3-36.3 0.8-26.2 0.2Upper extremity angiography 3.6-8.1 2.5-29.8 3.9-60.2 0.3Lower extremity angiography 1.8-21.7 1.0-82.2 0.2-1.42 0.8Nephrostography 0.9-24.7 0.1-72.9 0.0-14.2 2.4Carotid angiography 2.6-21.0 2.6-79.8 4.7-63.7 4.9Transjugular hepatic biopsy 2.8-18.7 5.5-95.3 0.0-25.4 5.5Renal angiography 2.9-7.6 4.7-31.6 12.7-40.2 6.4Cerebral angiography 2.9-36.0 7.7-121 10.8-76.6 7.4Femoral angiography 1.8-17.2 1.0-44.6 0.2-91.8 7.5Thoracic angiography 0.6-114 2.2-167 9.2-115 11.9PTC 2.9-44.0 12.0-1.92 0.0-11.3 12.8CT arterial portography 2.3-25.8 17.1-231 0.0-56.5 12.9Abdominal angiography 1.8-27.1 13.0-102 5.4-227 18.9Hepatic angiography 3.6-41.8 22.8-168 16.2-149 21.7<strong>The</strong>rapeuticAV fistula angioplasty 4.8-57.9 0.2-96.3 0.9-45.1 0.3Biliary stent insertion/removal 0.6-26.3 3.1-137 0.0-18.7 6.9Nephrostomy 1.3-20.8 0.6-160 0.0-44.7 6.9Cerebral embolization 15.2-55.8 28.3-61.9 36.3-162 10.5Renal angioplasty 11.4-27.2 5.4-190 2.6-77.7 13.6Thoracic therapeutic procedures 4.2-35.0 4.5-182 10.9-168 16.3Other abdominal therapeutic 6.6-58.8 16.9-413 1.1-229 26.9procedures (excluding hepaticand renal)TIPS 21.7-100 212-897 61.4-234 83.9"1 Gy = 100 rads; 1 mSv = 100 mrem.Note: AV, arteriovenous; CT, computed tomography; PTC, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography;TIPS, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stunt.Adapted from McParland BJ: A study of patient radiation doses in interventional radiological procedures.Bf J Radio/1998;71:175-185.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!