13.07.2015 Views

LABOULBENIALES - Agentschap voor Natuur en Bos

LABOULBENIALES - Agentschap voor Natuur en Bos

LABOULBENIALES - Agentschap voor Natuur en Bos

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1. <strong>LABOULBENIALES</strong>1.1. DEFINITION OF <strong>LABOULBENIALES</strong>Laboulb<strong>en</strong>iales include over 2000 species in 141 g<strong>en</strong>era (SANTAMARIA, 1998; KIRKet al., 2001; WEIR & BLACKWELL, 2005) of obligate, ectoparasitic fungi, which liveassociated with arthropods, mostly true insects. Laboulb<strong>en</strong>iales have nomycelium; their thalli are small and of determinate growth, bearing antheridiaand perithecia on a receptacle with app<strong>en</strong>dages (TAVARES, 1985). Only sexualstages are known. Laboulb<strong>en</strong>iales are host-specific (THAXTER, 1896; SCHELOSKE,1969; TAVARES, 1985; MAJEWSKI, 1994; DE KESEL, 1996, 1997).The knowledge on Laboulb<strong>en</strong>iales is rather rec<strong>en</strong>t and has increased slowly.Large parts of their biodiversity are still unknown and many questions stillunresolved.1.2. HISTORICAL BACKGROUNDIn the 1840s, two Fr<strong>en</strong>ch <strong>en</strong>tomologists, Joseph Alexandre Laboulbéne andAuguste Rouget, did the earliest observations on Laboulb<strong>en</strong>iales resulting in afirst publication on the Laboulb<strong>en</strong>iales (ROUGET, 1850, ref. in TAVARES, 1985). Atfirst, the structures on Brachinus (Coleoptera, Carabidae) were thought to besupernumerary ant<strong>en</strong>nal segm<strong>en</strong>ts. ROUGET (1850, ref. in TAVARES, 1985)suggested that they were living organisms. The recognition as fungi came in1852 and the g<strong>en</strong>us Laboulb<strong>en</strong>ia was raised within the Pyr<strong>en</strong>omycetes – anext<strong>en</strong>sive group of Ascomycetes (ROBIN, 1853). Later on, specim<strong>en</strong>s onwingless dipteran parasites of bats were still mistak<strong>en</strong>ly described asArthrorhynchus, an acanthocephalan worm, by KOLENATI (1857).MAYR (1853) thought that the „hairlike structures‟ on Nebria (Coleoptera,Carabidae) were chitinous. Suggesting that they were outgrowths of theinsect‟s integum<strong>en</strong>t, he noticed differ<strong>en</strong>ces betwe<strong>en</strong> those structures onyounger and older beetles. On older individuals, there was always a variableswelling on the hair, whereas no such swelling was pres<strong>en</strong>t on the hair ofyounger beetles.PEYRITSCH (1871) made ext<strong>en</strong>sive observations on the structure anddevelopm<strong>en</strong>t of the housefly Laboulb<strong>en</strong>ia (L. muscae Peyr.). PEYRITSCH (1871)redescribed Arthrorhynchus as Laboulb<strong>en</strong>ia nycteribiae Peyr. He laterestablished the family Laboulb<strong>en</strong>iaceae in the Ascomycetes (PEYRITSCH, 1873)and laid a solid foundation for our understanding of the biology ofLaboulb<strong>en</strong>iales (PEYRITSCH, 1875), based on observations of laboratory coloniesof houseflies and studies of Laboulb<strong>en</strong>iales in the field.A systematic study of the Laboulb<strong>en</strong>iaceae was begun by Roland Thaxter in1890, wh<strong>en</strong> he published his first in a series of papers describing hundreds ofnew species. In 1896, THAXTER‟S first monographic volume on theLaboulb<strong>en</strong>iaceae appeared. It was particularly a summary upon all previouswork (TAVARES, 1985). The monograph of Thaxter – five volumes, published in1896, 1908, 1924, 1926 and 1931 – constituted the basis for later studies of thegroup. Unfortunately Thaxter died only one year after the publication of theP a g e | 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!