Table XLI: Comparison betwe<strong>en</strong> Sonian Forest and Meerdaal Forest.Sonian Forest (deer)Meerdaal Forest (pig)Family # specim<strong>en</strong>s # species # specim<strong>en</strong>s # speciesBuprestidae - - 1 1Cantharidae - - 1 1Carabidae 22 4 1 1Cerambycidae - - 3 3Chrysomelidae - - 3 1Cleridae 1 1 9 4Curculionidae - - 4 3Dermestidae - - 8 2Elateridae - - 14 7Geotrupidae 122 1 4 1Histeridae 33 3 44 6Melyridae - - 2 2Nitidulidae - - 15 3Ptiliidae - - 1 1Scarabaeidae - - 6 3Scraptiidae - - 6 3Silphidae 37 7 66 8Staphylinidae 9 6 13 5T<strong>en</strong>ebrionidae - - 4 2TOTAL 224 22 205 57Notably more Geotrupes specim<strong>en</strong>s have be<strong>en</strong> recorded in the Sonian Forest.However, wh<strong>en</strong> recorded that much in the Sonian Forest, one should expectthem to also be pres<strong>en</strong>t in large numbers in the Meerdaal Forest, since theytypically feed on decomposing organic matter.Also noteworthy is the differ<strong>en</strong>ce in specim<strong>en</strong>s of carabids: 22 in the SonianForest against only 1 in the Meerdaal Forest.However, in the Meerdaal Forest only the Coleoptera with for<strong>en</strong>sic applicabilitywere collected: many Carabus violaceus and Geotrupes species wereobserved but not collected (YVES BRAET, pers. comm., 2011). Therefore, th<strong>en</strong>umber of specim<strong>en</strong>s collected in each forest cannot be compared since theprotocols were differ<strong>en</strong>t. It is suggested to replicate this research, focusing onthe following issues:(1) A single protocol should be used in both the Sonian Forest and MeerdaalForest;(2) Three plots should be studied in each forest, with all plots in the samevegetation type: a plot with deer cadaver, a plot with pig cadaver and acontrol plot;(3) Regarding the influ<strong>en</strong>ce during the weather (cfr. 4.1. WEATHER), allobservations should be done in the same season, under similar weatherconditions (temperature, humidity), at the same time in the course of aday.Adapting Table XLI following Table XII (in 1.1. FORENSIC ENTOMOLOGY) results in atable only comprising carrion beetles, thus with for<strong>en</strong>sic applicability:P a g e | 73
Table XLII: Comparison of carrion beetle families betwe<strong>en</strong> Sonian Forest and MeerdaalForest.Sonian Forest (deer)Meerdaal Forest (pig)Family # specim<strong>en</strong>s # species # specim<strong>en</strong>s # speciesCleridae 1 1 9 4Dermestidae - - 8 2Histeridae 33 3 44 6Nitidulidae - - 15 3Scarabaeidae - - 6 3Silphidae 37 7 66 8Staphylinidae 9 6 13 5TOTAL 80 17 161 31No Trogidae have be<strong>en</strong> recorded, although those beetles have be<strong>en</strong>described as being frequ<strong>en</strong>tly pres<strong>en</strong>t in the proximity of cadavers. DUCHATELET (1986) estimates the number of Western European species on twelve.Four species are pres<strong>en</strong>t in Belgium, only one of which in the locality of Brussels(TROUKENS, 2007).Since all Coleoptera with for<strong>en</strong>sic significance were collected in both theSonian Forest and Meerdaal Forest, it is no problem to compare the results ofthe two forests with each other. One should not forget, however, that thereare also other factors to be tak<strong>en</strong> into account: soil, forest composition,season, temperature, humidity, ...Reducing the original table of Coleoptera emphasizes ev<strong>en</strong> more thediffer<strong>en</strong>ces betwe<strong>en</strong> the two collecting areas. Half of the families with for<strong>en</strong>sicimportance pres<strong>en</strong>t in the Meerdaal Forest have not be<strong>en</strong> recorded at all inthe Sonian Forest.A very important factor determining insect succession is the geographicalregion where the cadaver is found (ASISTM, 2009). Both the Sonian Forest andthe Meerdaal Forest are remnants of the anci<strong>en</strong>t Silva Carbonaria. However,the soil in the Sonian Forest has some typical characteristics.Soil evolution processes, dating from the time that the climate in these regionswas similar to that in Siberia or northern Canada nowadays, <strong>en</strong>ded some10.000 years ago, along with the <strong>en</strong>ding of the Weichselian glaciation. The soilin the Sonian Forest has never be<strong>en</strong> disturbed by man, resulting in apreservation of the unique soil features. These features include tongue-shapedspots at a depth of 30 to 120 cm. Soil studies have shown that these ferruginousspots are very old bursts, the soil in betwe<strong>en</strong> being very compact (DE MEYER &LANGOHR, 1984; SANDERS et al., 1985). This means that the root system of treescan only grow superficially, in the humus layer, having both physiological andphysical consequ<strong>en</strong>ces. All minerals and water available is absorbed by thetrees (physiological root competition). In addition, this superficial root carpetcauses a (physical) lack of space for the evolution of other root systems.The upper 30 cm of the soil in the Sonian Forest displays a dehydration andreduction of all biological processes. In the parts with beech forest, the uppersoil layer, consisting of decomposing leaves, is very thick, since beech leavesP a g e | 74
- Page 3:
LABOULBENIALESEXPLORING AND TESTING
- Page 7 and 8:
PART IVPRELIMINARY CHECKLIST OF LAB
- Page 9 and 10:
SAMENVATTINGINLEIDINGLaboulbeniales
- Page 11 and 12:
PART IGENERAL INTRODUCTIONTHESIS OU
- Page 13 and 14:
fifth volume, therefore the sixth v
- Page 16 and 17:
1.3.3. THE PERITHECI UMAscospores o
- Page 18 and 19:
The identity of appendages, togethe
- Page 20 and 21:
Figure IV: Position of Laboulbeniom
- Page 22 and 23:
LUMBSCH & HUHNDORF (2007) distingui
- Page 25 and 26: Substrate is the intermediate facto
- Page 27: CAVARA (1899, ref. in BENJAMIN, 197
- Page 35 and 36: 1. INTRODUCTION1.1. DIFFICULTIES FO
- Page 37 and 38: 2. MATERIALS & METHODS2.1. FUNGUS,
- Page 39 and 40: 2.2.6. PROTOCOL V: DIRECT PCROne th
- Page 41 and 42: P a g e | 38chance. Thus, the lower
- Page 43 and 44: coll1133 Laboulbenia collae IV 608l
- Page 45 and 46: Cladosporium (Ascomycota, Dothideom
- Page 47 and 48: 5. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONSMany a
- Page 49 and 50: 1. INTRODUCTION1.1. FORENSIC ENTOMO
- Page 51 and 52: Different groups of carrion beetles
- Page 53 and 54: The 1.319 ha Meerdaal Forest has be
- Page 55 and 56: 2.2. MEERDAAL FOREST(DA TA NA TI O
- Page 57 and 58: approximately 2.700 are found in Eu
- Page 59 and 60: Order ColeopteraSuborder PolyphagaI
- Page 61 and 62: Dermestidae 8 2 23 (3) / 22 (4)Elat
- Page 63 and 64: Table XXIV: Family Cerambycidae fro
- Page 65 and 66: Table XXVIII: Family Dermestidae fr
- Page 67 and 68: Adults prey on other flower-visitin
- Page 69 and 70: Table XXXV: Family Scarabaeidae fro
- Page 71 and 72: Creophilus Samouellemaxillosus (Lin
- Page 73 and 74: 4.3. LABOULBENIALES OF CARRION BEET
- Page 75: The knowledge about the preferences
- Page 79 and 80: 5. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONSNo spe
- Page 81 and 82: 1. INTRODUCTION1.1. NATURAL LANDSCA
- Page 83 and 84: In the 40s, Middelhoek studied and
- Page 85 and 86: 2. MATERIALS & METHODS2.1. HOSTS2.1
- Page 87 and 88: Screening of the insects was done w
- Page 89 and 90: 3. RESULTS3.1. PARASITE-HOST LISTA
- Page 91 and 92: Figure XV: Detail of thallus of Lab
- Page 93 and 94: isodiametric or slightly elongate,
- Page 95 and 96: occurs in the lower receptacle (cel
- Page 97 and 98: Discussion:Two species of the genus
- Page 99 and 100: anches (15-)34-38(-40) µm long, te
- Page 101 and 102: 5. CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONSIn The
- Page 103 and 104: P a g e | 100ADRIAENS, T. & GYSELS,
- Page 105 and 106: transmission, habitat preference an
- Page 107 and 108: STALPERS, J.A., VILGALYS, R., AIME,
- Page 109 and 110: MELIS, C., TEURLINGS, I. LINNELL, J
- Page 111 and 112: SCHILTHUIZEN, M. & VALLENDUUK, H. (