- Page 4: The designation of geographical ent
- Page 9: Chapter 1: IntroductionJan Robinson
- Page 12 and 13: limited, subsistence levels of expl
- Page 14: NTRs for spawning aggregations usin
- Page 17 and 18: al. 2003). Verification may include
- Page 19 and 20: a fraction of spawning sites are pr
- Page 21 and 22: Chapter 3: Targeted fishing of the
- Page 23 and 24: verifying spawning aggregations, we
- Page 25 and 26: ecorded from inshore close to the c
- Page 27 and 28: (a)(b)Fig. 3. Spatial patterns ofca
- Page 30 and 31: pooled sizes of the three spawning
- Page 32 and 33: found S. sutor contributed up to 44
- Page 34 and 35: 2011b). However, observations of fi
- Page 36 and 37: MethodsTo identify seasonal and lun
- Page 38 and 39: n=199Females GSI (mean ± SE)2.521.
- Page 40 and 41: The estimate of size at maturity in
- Page 42 and 43: This study was designed to verify S
- Page 44 and 45: were selected. Fish selected for ta
- Page 46 and 47: The number of traps increased on th
- Page 48 and 49: Of the 9 tagged fish detected by re
- Page 50 and 51: Fig. 7. Diel patterns ofdetection f
- Page 52 and 53: Spawning aggregation site fidelity
- Page 54 and 55: Chapter 6: Shoemaker spinefoot rabb
- Page 56 and 57:
anterior of the anus and below the
- Page 58 and 59:
A high percentage (80.8%) of depart
- Page 60 and 61:
arrivals and departures at these tw
- Page 62 and 63:
are typically applied for reef fish
- Page 64 and 65:
(a)(b)(c)Chapter 3, Figure 3. Spati
- Page 66 and 67:
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)Chapter 7, Table
- Page 68 and 69:
Chapter 12, Fig. 1 Fraction of fema
- Page 70 and 71:
Plates 8. Selected photographs from
- Page 72 and 73:
MethodsStudy sitesThe study area wa
- Page 74 and 75:
which shelved gently ( ca. 25 o ) t
- Page 76 and 77:
Fig. 4. Lunar periodicity in number
- Page 78 and 79:
Behaviour and appearanceDescription
- Page 80 and 81:
eported aggregations forming betwee
- Page 82 and 83:
The sizes of E. fuscoguttatus aggre
- Page 84 and 85:
Materials and methodsStudy area and
- Page 86 and 87:
TL. All fish tagged were considered
- Page 88 and 89:
Lunar timing of arrivals and depart
- Page 90 and 91:
Fig. 8. The presence and absence of
- Page 92 and 93:
aggregation fishing. This critical
- Page 94 and 95:
Chapter 9: Persistence of grouper (
- Page 96 and 97:
ResultsBetween 2003 and 2006, the c
- Page 98 and 99:
Fig. 2. Mean (± standard error, SE
- Page 100 and 101:
A few species (e.g. Epinephelus gut
- Page 102 and 103:
(a)(b)Fig. 1. Map of (a) study site
- Page 104 and 105:
Fig. 2. Number of E. lanceolatus ob
- Page 106 and 107:
was having any impact on the popula
- Page 108 and 109:
A spawning aggregation is said to o
- Page 110 and 111:
Chapter 11: Evaluation of an indica
- Page 112 and 113:
Table 1 Aggregation fisheries asses
- Page 114 and 115:
the lists of Jennings et al. (1999)
- Page 116 and 117:
with the more vulnerable labrids an
- Page 118 and 119:
The remaining serranid populations
- Page 120 and 121:
Spawning aggregation behaviour is c
- Page 122 and 123:
tiger grouper, Mycteroperca tigris:
- Page 124 and 125:
of protecting the normal residence
- Page 126 and 127:
• Since grouper males are afforde
- Page 128 and 129:
Fig. 2 Yield-per-recruit normalized
- Page 130 and 131:
The approaches identified above are
- Page 132 and 133:
during full moon periods. Siganus s
- Page 134 and 135:
model, many parameter estimates are
- Page 136 and 137:
ReferencesAbunge C (2011) Managing
- Page 138 and 139:
Cox DR (1972) Regression models and
- Page 140 and 141:
Grüss A, Kaplan DM, Hart DR (2011b
- Page 142 and 143:
Kaunda-Arara B, Rose GA (2004a) Eff
- Page 144:
Newcomer RT, Taylor DH, Guttman SI
- Page 147 and 148:
Sancho G, Petersen CW, Lobel PS (20
- Page 149 and 150:
Appendix 1. QuestionnaireMASMA SPAW
- Page 151 and 152:
8. Spawning aggregation knowledgeUs
- Page 153 and 154:
Example items KSh Furthest site Clo
- Page 155 and 156:
Appendix II. Experimental testing o
- Page 157 and 158:
Clove oil concentrationAt a concent
- Page 159 and 160:
Appendix III. Application of acoust
- Page 161 and 162:
153