CONTENTS
Contents of 41(2) 2013 - acharya ng ranga agricultural university
Contents of 41(2) 2013 - acharya ng ranga agricultural university
- No tags were found...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
INDIAN BREAD MAKING TOOLS - CONSUMER EVALUATION AND DESIGN MODIFICATION<br />
Under subject aspect both the Quantitative<br />
and Qualitative measurements like anthropometry,<br />
palm length, palm width, grip diameter, palm index,<br />
grip strength, elbow angles, time of operation<br />
evaluation of user was done. Six willing respondents<br />
were selected for ergonomic evaluation.<br />
Anthropometry<br />
Table 3. Average anthropometric measurements of respondents (N=6)<br />
Dimensions<br />
Measurements<br />
Right hand<br />
Left hand<br />
Palm length (cm) 20.0 19.8<br />
Palm width (cm) 11.4 11.4<br />
Inner grip diameter(cm) 4.8 4.4<br />
Anthropometric measurements that were<br />
studied- palm length, palm width and inner grip<br />
diameter of the sample, and length and width of the<br />
tools. An anthropometer was used to measure the<br />
dimensions i.e., anthropometry of the human body.<br />
Table 3 shows a very minimal variation in palm length.<br />
Palm Index<br />
Table 4. Average Palm Index of the respondents (%) (N=6)<br />
Rolling pin and rolling<br />
board<br />
Right hand<br />
Left hand<br />
Model 1 14.2 14.1<br />
Model 2 18.5 18.8<br />
Model 3 8.2 6.0<br />
Model 4 18.8 17.5<br />
The contact area of the hand with the handle<br />
of the rolling pin is important, the greater the contact<br />
area the better will be the grip. To measure it, the<br />
working area of the handle was painted with lamp<br />
black color and the subjects were asked to hold the<br />
rolling pin as they generally hold them naturally in<br />
the kitchen. An impression of the painted palm was<br />
taken on a plain white paper. Outlines of the painted<br />
area were marked and measured. The equipment<br />
used to conduct the experiment was sliding calipers<br />
and measuring tape. It is evident from the data in<br />
table – 4, that while using model 2 and model 4 rolling<br />
pins the force is distributed to larger area of the palm<br />
compared to other models, increasing the efficiency<br />
of model 3 compared to other models as when grip<br />
force required is distributed to a large pressure<br />
bearing area on the finger and palm to increase the<br />
work efficiency. The result is in accordance with the<br />
study by Hedge and Poncers, (1995) who revealed<br />
that grip force required should get distributed to as<br />
large pressure bearing area on the finger and palm<br />
as possible to increase the work efficiency.<br />
103