CONTENTS
Contents of 41(2) 2013 - acharya ng ranga agricultural university
Contents of 41(2) 2013 - acharya ng ranga agricultural university
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
BRAHMA et al<br />
Table 1. Details of treatments imposed<br />
Treatment<br />
Combination of treatments<br />
T 1<br />
T 2<br />
T 3<br />
T 4<br />
T 5<br />
T 6<br />
T 7<br />
T 8<br />
T 9<br />
T 10<br />
T 11<br />
T 12<br />
H 1 D 1 (100% Flowering stage + Sun drying)<br />
H 1 D 2 (100% Flowering stage + Shade drying)<br />
H 1 D 3 (100% Flowering stage + Oven drying)<br />
H 2 D 1 (Fruiting stage + Sun drying)<br />
H 2 D 2 (Fruiting stage + Shade drying)<br />
H 2 D 3 (Fruiting stage + Oven drying)<br />
H 3 D 1 (Mature green berry stage + Sun drying)<br />
H 3 D 2 (Mature green berry stage + Shade drying)<br />
H 3 D 3 (Mature green berry stage + Oven drying)<br />
H 4 D 1 (Berry ripening stage + Sun drying)<br />
H 4 D 2 (Berry ripening stage + Shade drying)<br />
H 4 D 3 (Berry ripening stage + Oven drying)<br />
Table 2. Effect of harvesting stages and drying methods on alkaloid content in main crop (dry) (kg/ha)<br />
of makoi Solanum nigrum L.<br />
Treatment D 1 D 2 D 3 Mean<br />
H 1 2.25 5.90 3.95 4.03<br />
H 2 8.93 25.04 16.46 16.81<br />
H 3 44.88 53.95 48.05 48.96<br />
H 4 14.44 35.98 23.82 24.74<br />
Mean 17.62 30.21 23.07 23.63<br />
F-test SEm CD@5%<br />
H * 0.52 1.55<br />
D * 0.45 1.34<br />
H×D * 0.91 2.68<br />
The perusal of data presented in Table 3<br />
indicates that of alkaloid yield in ratoon crop as<br />
influenced by harvesting stages and drying methods<br />
followed same trend as in the main crop.<br />
Makoi crop harvested at 100% flowering stage that<br />
gave lowest alkaloid yield (1.93kg ha -1 ) has differed<br />
significantly with the crop harvested at mature green<br />
berry stage that registered maximum alkaloid yield<br />
142