21.09.2015 Views

CONTENTS

Contents of 41(2) 2013 - acharya ng ranga agricultural university

Contents of 41(2) 2013 - acharya ng ranga agricultural university

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MATHURA et al<br />

Where U N<br />

and U 0<br />

are total plant N uptake<br />

(kgha -1 ) in the above ground biomass at a certain<br />

level of fertilizer application [F (kg ha -1 )] and in the<br />

control treatment, respectively.<br />

The mean uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus<br />

and potassium by was 64.91, 22.34 and 38.1 kg<br />

ha -1 , respectively (Table 1). Nutrient (NPK) uptake<br />

was influenced by different cultivars. Variety V 2<br />

(NIDW 295) and V 3<br />

(UAS 415) registered similar<br />

nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake but<br />

significantly higher in comparison to other varieties<br />

viz., V 1<br />

(Sonalika), V 4<br />

(NIAW 917) and V 5<br />

(DWR 162)<br />

owing higher yield. Among the latter varieties V 1<br />

had<br />

performed well in terms of nutrient (NPK) uptake over<br />

V 4<br />

and V 5<br />

, which were on par. Variation in NPK uptake<br />

among varieties differing in their genetic makeup was<br />

Table 1. Nutrient (NPK) uptake (kg ha -1 ) of wheat as influenced by varieties and nitrogen levels at<br />

harvest<br />

Cultivars<br />

Treatments<br />

Seed yield<br />

(kg ha -1 )<br />

Total NPK uptake (grain +Straw)<br />

N P K<br />

V 1 – Sonalika 2569.7 55.36 9.74 30.01<br />

V 2 – NIDW 295 3169.5 73.91 11.24 37.02<br />

V 3 – UAS 415 3091.1 70.28 11.11 36.04<br />

V 4 – NIAW 917 2374.3 43.98 8.50 26.86<br />

V 5 – DWR 162 2447.0 47.85 8.51 28.67<br />

SEd±<br />

141.4<br />

2.17<br />

0.45<br />

0.93<br />

CD at 5%<br />

326.2<br />

5.01<br />

1.03<br />

2.15<br />

Nitrogen Levels<br />

N 0 – 0 kg N ha -1 1645.7 24.13 5.52 18.29<br />

N 80 – 80 kg N ha -1 2734.6 54.57 9.77 31.60<br />

N 120 – 120 kg N ha -1 2930.7 63.98 10.63 34.55<br />

N 160 – 160 kg N ha -1 3168.6 74.49 11.26 36.99<br />

N 200 – 200 kg N ha -1 3172.3 74.72 11.32 37.16<br />

SEd ±<br />

76.8<br />

1.52<br />

0.25<br />

0.86<br />

CD at 5%<br />

155.3<br />

3.08<br />

0.51<br />

1.74<br />

Interaction effect (V x N)<br />

Sub at same level of main treatment<br />

SEd±<br />

171.7<br />

3.41<br />

0.56<br />

1.93<br />

CD at 5%<br />

NS<br />

NS<br />

NS<br />

NS<br />

Main treatment at same or different levels of sub treatment<br />

SEd±<br />

208.8<br />

3.74<br />

0.67<br />

1.96<br />

CD at 5%<br />

NS<br />

NS<br />

NS<br />

NS<br />

General mean 2730.3 64.91 22.34 38.10<br />

132

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!