CONTENTS
Contents of 41(2) 2013 - acharya ng ranga agricultural university
Contents of 41(2) 2013 - acharya ng ranga agricultural university
- No tags were found...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PARASHURAM and JAYARAME<br />
Table 5. Proportional contribution of lines, testers and interaction of line x tester for various yield<br />
and yield contributing characters in Finger millet<br />
Characters<br />
Contribution of<br />
females (%)<br />
Contribution of<br />
males (%)<br />
Contribution of<br />
females (%) X<br />
male (%)<br />
Plant height 71.28 7.76 20.96<br />
Number of fingers per ear 78.96 6.75 14.29<br />
Number of productive tillers per plant 27.19 12.59 60.21<br />
Finger length 57.48 14.42 28.1<br />
Finger width 15.72 10.69 73.58<br />
Culm width 32.64 14.75 52.61<br />
Peduncle length 71.38 3.69 24.92<br />
Days to 50% flowering 30.93 20.6 48.48<br />
Days to maturity 59.04 22.5 18.46<br />
Straw yield per plant 54.48 19.35 26.17<br />
Yield per plant 64.17 13.58 22.25<br />
1000 seed weight 48.71 5.29 46.01<br />
Table 6. Estimates of variance components for yield and yield contributing characters in finger millet<br />
Characters 2 gca 2 sca 2 gca/ 2 sca<br />
Plant height 4.80 24.47 0.20 : 1<br />
Number of fingers per ear 0.06 0.11 0.53 : 1<br />
Number of productive tillers per plant 0.00 0.09 0.00: 1<br />
Finger length 0.04 0.29 0.12 : 1<br />
Finger width -0.00 0.01 -0.03 : 1<br />
Culm width 0.00 0.00 0.02 : 1<br />
Peduncle length 1.60 10.52 0.15 : 1<br />
Days to 50% flowering 0.03 0.86 0.04 : 1<br />
Days to maturity 0.17 0.20 0.84 : 1<br />
Straw yield per plant 7.67 55.82 0.14 : 1<br />
Yield per plant 2.68 14.65 0.18 : 1<br />
1000 seed weight 0.00 0.03 0.03 : 1<br />
best crosses since they possessed desirable per se<br />
performance and sca for plant height, number of<br />
productive tillers per plant, straw yield per plant and<br />
grain yield per plant (Table 4).<br />
For all the 12 characters studied, the<br />
contributions of females were considerably more<br />
compared to males to the variance for all the<br />
characters (Table 5). With respect to estimates of<br />
variance components, the variance due to specific<br />
combining ability effects was more for all the traits<br />
than variance due to general combining ability effects<br />
but none of the characters were exceeded unity<br />
66