21.09.2015 Views

CONTENTS

Contents of 41(2) 2013 - acharya ng ranga agricultural university

Contents of 41(2) 2013 - acharya ng ranga agricultural university

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

J.Res. ANGRAU 41(2) 68-73, 2013<br />

EFFECT OF FRONT LINE DEMONSTRATIONS AND TRAININGS ON KNOWLEDGE<br />

AND ADOPTION OF INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES BY<br />

CHICKPEA FARMERS OF PRAKASAM DISTRICT OF ANDHRA PRADESH<br />

O. SARADA and G. V. SUNEEL KUMAR<br />

Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Acharya N.G. Ranga Agricultural University, Darsi – 523 247<br />

Date of Receipt : 21.01.2013 Date of Acceptance : 05.03.2013<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

The study was conducted in Prakasam District of Andhra Pradesh during 2012. The investigation included<br />

50 chickpea farmers from two adopted villages of Krishi Vigyan Kendra who have participated in trainings and Front<br />

Line Demonstrations on Integrated Pest Management practices and 50 other chickpea farmers who have not<br />

undergone trainings and FLDs on IPM from a non-adopted village. More than fifty per cent of beneficiary chickpea<br />

farmers had medium level of knowledge and adoption with respect to Integrated Pest Management practices,<br />

followed by 32.00 and 36.00 per cent of beneficiary farmers under high category respectively. Whereas 40.00 and<br />

48.00 per cent of the non-beneficiary farmers were in low knowledge and adoption categories, respectively. A large<br />

majority of beneficiary chickpea farmers were fully adopting summer ploughing (100.00%), need based plant<br />

protection measures (86.00%), growing of trap crop (78.00%), disease resistant cultivars (62.00%), seed treatment<br />

(56.00%) and partially adopting spraying of neem formulations and erecting bird perches. The major constraints<br />

faced by beneficiary farmers in adoption of recommended Integrated Pest Management practices of chickpea are<br />

non-availability of disease resistant cultivars (98.00%), inputs like bacterial pesticides, pheromone traps (94.00%)<br />

and complex and labor intensive practices of neem seed kernel extract and poison bait preparation (72.00%) etc.<br />

Chickpea is the third most important grain<br />

legume that accounts for nearly 40 per cent of the<br />

total pulse production in India. In India, it is grown in<br />

5.65 mha producing 4.15 m. ton annually with<br />

productivity of 740 Kg ha -1 . In Andhra Pradesh, it is<br />

grown in an area of 5.29 lakh ha with annual<br />

production of 6.28 lakh tons and productivity of 842<br />

Kg ha -1 (Ministry of Agriculture, 2009). Prakasam<br />

district of Andhra Pradesh has highest acreage (0.95<br />

lakh ha.) under chick pea and is rapidly increasing<br />

for the last three or four years by replacing tobacco<br />

and other commercial crops in view of their eroding<br />

profitability when compared to chick pea. In order to<br />

get highest yields from the crop, farmers are using<br />

chemical inputs indiscriminately which has led to pest<br />

resistance and environmental pollution.<br />

The use of pesticides that are used by farmers<br />

to improve production and productivity are beset with<br />

conflicting interests between the farmers on one hand<br />

and society on the other. Even though social<br />

considerations would warrant the use of target<br />

specific pesticides which degrade expeditiously in<br />

the environment, the farmers use those pesticides<br />

that are easily available, cheap and simple to use.<br />

In this context, Front Line Demonstrations<br />

(FLDs) and trainings on recommended Integrated Pest<br />

Management (IPM) practices in chickpea were being<br />

implemented by Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK), Darsi<br />

in its adopted villages of Prakasam district for three<br />

years from 2009 to 2011 with the twin objectives of<br />

minimizing environmental pollution and maximizing<br />

the cost benefit ratio. With this background in view,<br />

to know the effect of FLDs and trainings on knowledge<br />

and adoption levels of farmers, this particular study<br />

was taken up with the following specific objectives.<br />

To assess the overall knowledge and adoption<br />

levels of beneficiary and non-beneficiary chickpea<br />

farmers with respect to recommended IPM practices<br />

in chickpea.<br />

To assess the component wise knowledge and<br />

adoption levels of beneficiary and non-beneficiary<br />

chickpea farmers with respect to recommended IPM<br />

practices in chickpea.<br />

email: saradasuneel@gmail.com<br />

68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!