30.09.2015 Views

UNCLE TOM'S CABIN

1iw97FV

1iw97FV

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the<br />

" he<br />

_<br />

102 KEY TO <strong>UNCLE</strong> TOM S <strong>CABIN</strong>.<br />

him, Iiisknees a few inches from the floor,and his on the testimony of a house-servant, the nature of<br />

head thrown forward<br />

"<br />

body warm and supwhich<br />

does not appear to have been inquired into<br />

.ple(orrelaxed),but life was extinct.<br />

by the court ! Not a word is said which authorizes<br />

"<br />

It was provedby the surgeons who made a postmortem<br />

the belief that any careful examination<br />

examination before the coroner's inquestwas made, as it respectstheir guilt.Lewis and<br />

that the death was caused by strangulation by Reuben were assumed, on loose evidence, without<br />

hanging; and other eminent surgeons were examined<br />

deliberate investigation, to be guilty; and then,<br />

to show, from the appearance of the brain without allowingthem to attemptto show their<br />

and its blood-vessels after death (asexhibited at evidence,they were whipped, until a confession<br />

the post-mortemexamination), that the subjectof guiltwas extorted by bodilypain.<br />

could not have fainted before strangulation. Is this Virginia justice 1<br />

"<br />

After the evidence was finished on both sides, Lewis was punished with " a broad leathern<br />

the jury from their box, and of their<br />

" own motion, strap,''' was punishedseverely :" this we<br />

without a word from counsel on either side,informed<br />

do not need to be told. A " broad leathern strap"<br />

the court that they had agreed upon their isAvelladaptedto severity of punishment. " Nor<br />

verdict. The counsel assented to itsbeing thus was it pretended,"the account says, "in any<br />

received,and a verdict of " not guilty " was immediately<br />

quarter,that this punishmentimplicated either<br />

rendered. The attorneyfor the commonwealth<br />

his lifeor his health." This is false ; it was expressly<br />

then informed the court that all the<br />

stated in the newspaper accounts at the<br />

evidence for the prosecutionhad been laid before time,and such was the generalimpression in the<br />

the jury; and as no new evidence could be offered neighborhoodțhat the punishment did very severely<br />

on the trialof Stephen D. Castleman,he submitted<br />

implicate his life. But more of.fchis anon.<br />

to the court the proprietyof entering a Lewis was left. A chain was fastened around<br />

nolleprosequi Ṭhe<br />

judgerepliedthat the case had his neck,so as not to choke him, and secured to<br />

been fully and fairly laid before the juryupon the the joistabove,leaving a slack of about a foot and<br />

evidence ; that the court was not only satisfied a half. Remaining in an uprightposition, he was<br />

with the verdict,but,if any other had been rendered,<br />

secure againststrangulation, but he could neither<br />

it must have been set aside ; and that if no sitnor kneel ; and should he faint,he would be<br />

further evidence was to be adduced on the trial of choked to death. The account says that they<br />

Stephen, the attorneyfor the commonwealth fastened him thus for the<br />

purpose of securing<br />

would exercise a<br />

proper discretionin entering a him. If this had been the sole object,it could<br />

nolleprosequias to him, and the court would have been<br />

approve<br />

accomplishedby safer and less cruel<br />

its being done. A nolle prosequiwas entered<br />

methods, as<br />

every reader must know. This mode<br />

accordingly, and both gentlemendischarged. of securing him was intended probablyto intimidate<br />

"<br />

It maybe added that two dayswere consumed him, and,at the same time, afforded some<br />

in exhibiting the evidence,and that the trial was gratification to the vindictive feeling which controlled<br />

by a jury of Clarke County. Both the parties the actors in this foul transaction. The<br />

had been on bail from the time of their arrest,and man whom they left to watch Lewis said that,<br />

were continued on bail whilst the trial was depending."<br />

after remaining there about half an hour, he went<br />

home ; and Lewis was then alive. The Castlemans<br />

say that,after punishingReuben, theyreturned,<br />

Let us admit that the evidence does not prove havingbeen absent not more than half an<br />

the legal crime of homicide : what candid man hour, and they found him hangingby the neck,<br />

can doubt, after reading this ex parte version of it, dead. We direct attention to this partof the<br />

that the slave died in consequence of the punishment<br />

testimony, to show how loose the statements were<br />

inflicted upon him ?<br />

which went to make<br />

up the evidence.<br />

In criminal prosecutionsthe federal constitution<br />

Why was Lewis chained at all,and a man left<br />

guarantees to the accused the righ to a "<br />

public<br />

to watch him ? To secure him," say the Castlemans.<br />

Is it customary to chain slaves in this<br />

trial by an impartialjury; the rightto be<br />

informed of the nature and cause of the accusation<br />

manner, and set a watch over them, after severe<br />

; to be confronted with the witnesses againstpunishment țo prevent their running away ? If<br />

him ; to have compulsoryprocess for obtaining the punishment of Lewis had not been unusual,<br />

witness in his favor ; and to have the assistance and if he had not been threatened with another<br />

of counsel ; guaranteesnecessary<br />

to secure innocence<br />

infliction on their return, there would have been<br />

"<br />

againsthastyor vindictivejudgment, absolutely<br />

no necessityfor chaining him.<br />

necessary to preventinjustice. Grant that The testimony of the man leftto watch<br />

they were not intended represents<br />

forslaves ; every master of him as desperate, apparently, with painand<br />

a slave must feel that they are still morallybinding<br />

fright. "Lewis asked for a box to stand on:"<br />

upon him. He is the sole judge; he alone why ? Was he not suffering from painand exhaustion,<br />

determines the offence, the proofrequisiteto establish<br />

and did he not wish to rest himself,<br />

it,and the amount of the punishment. without danger of slow strangulation 1 Again :<br />

The slave then has a peculiar claim upon him for he asked for " something he could jump off from ;"<br />

justice Ẉhen "<br />

chargedwith a crime, common after the Castlemans left,he expressed a fear<br />

humanityrequiresthat he should be informed of when they came back that he would be whipped<br />

it țhat he should be confronted with the witnesses again; and said, if he had a knife, and could get<br />

againsthim, that he should be permitted to show one hand loose,he would cut his throat."<br />

evidence in favor of his innocence.<br />

The punishment that could drive him to such<br />

But how was poor Lewis treated 1 The son of desperation must have been horrible.<br />

Castleman said he had discovered who stole the How longthey were absent we know not, for<br />

money ; and it was forthwith " determined that the testimony this pointis contradictory.<br />

the offenders should be punished at once,<br />

and before<br />

They found him hangingby the neck, dead, " his<br />

Ikeyshould know of the discovery that had been feet thrown behind him,his knees a few inches<br />

made." Punished without a hearing ! Punished from the floor,and his head thrown forward,""

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!