07.12.2012 Views

Distance Education in Transition - Master of Distance Education ...

Distance Education in Transition - Master of Distance Education ...

Distance Education in Transition - Master of Distance Education ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Visions <strong>of</strong> Autonomous Learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

� have opportunities, and are compelled, to express their ideas, thoughts and<br />

knowledge verbally, partly even orally,<br />

� are obliged to communicate clearly and comprehensibly,<br />

� learn from other group members,<br />

� enjoy the feel<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> solv<strong>in</strong>g problems together,<br />

� are additionally motivated.<br />

A particularly attractive form <strong>of</strong> self-directed and self-responsible learn<strong>in</strong>g can be<br />

achieved if a knowledge build<strong>in</strong>g community (Scardamalia & Bereiter, 1992) can be<br />

established successfully <strong>in</strong> which several learners communicate via a central computer.<br />

Orig<strong>in</strong>ally these knowledge-build<strong>in</strong>g communities were developed <strong>in</strong> thriv<strong>in</strong>g scientific<br />

discipl<strong>in</strong>es, such as cellular microbiology. Here the researchers work jo<strong>in</strong>tly on the same<br />

subject and <strong>in</strong>form each other regularly about what they have experienced, discovered<br />

and worked out. At the same time they may criticise or praise <strong>in</strong>formation and texts they<br />

have received from other members <strong>of</strong> the community. In this way a virtual project group<br />

is created which produces new knowledge through jo<strong>in</strong>t discussions and <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

contributions. This model was also applied <strong>in</strong> schools. Its pedagogical advantages are<br />

obvious: not only are we faced here with an ambitious form <strong>of</strong> »autonomous learn<strong>in</strong>g«, but<br />

also with »partnership learn<strong>in</strong>g« and »group learn<strong>in</strong>g«, which strengthen the components <strong>of</strong><br />

»communicative learn<strong>in</strong>g«. Furthermore, new knowledge structures are developed here<br />

jo<strong>in</strong>tly, which can be <strong>in</strong>terpreted roughly <strong>in</strong> accordance with the radical constructivist<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g model (cf. Siebert, 1996, p. 16).<br />

A form <strong>of</strong> autonomous learn<strong>in</strong>g is be<strong>in</strong>g developed here which leaves expository teach<strong>in</strong>g<br />

and receptive learn<strong>in</strong>g far beh<strong>in</strong>d, replac<strong>in</strong>g them with <strong>in</strong>dependent achievements. The<br />

new learn<strong>in</strong>g behaviour manifests itself <strong>in</strong> the search for, and assessment and application<br />

<strong>of</strong>, suitable <strong>in</strong>formation and <strong>in</strong> careful (written!) communication and co-operation. The<br />

proximity to learn<strong>in</strong>g by do<strong>in</strong>g research and to academic work <strong>in</strong> general is remarkable.<br />

7.5. Distributed Problem-based Learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Problem solv<strong>in</strong>g is an acknowledged traditional goal <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>structional design. It is a process<br />

<strong>of</strong> recognis<strong>in</strong>g an obstacle or difficulty and <strong>of</strong> devis<strong>in</strong>g and test<strong>in</strong>g possible solutions.<br />

The pedagogical value <strong>of</strong> it is obvious when the learners generate new ideas, unique ways<br />

to solve the problem, contribute new ideas and identify new problems. This method is<br />

attractive as its high th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g levels can result <strong>in</strong> new learn<strong>in</strong>g. The traditional group<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g method dist<strong>in</strong>guishes eight stages: problem def<strong>in</strong>ition, analysis, generation <strong>of</strong><br />

alternatives, selection and synthesis <strong>of</strong> optimal solutions, controlled implementation,<br />

evaluation and revision.<br />

What happens to this process when it is performed by autonomous learners <strong>in</strong> “networked<br />

computer-supported collaborative learn<strong>in</strong>g environments (CSILE)”? Som Naidu (2003,<br />

p. 356), by referr<strong>in</strong>g to Evensen & Hmelo (2000), analysed this situation meticulously.<br />

He identified 15 stages. The ma<strong>in</strong> advantage <strong>of</strong> this scenario is that each learner comb<strong>in</strong>es<br />

rigorous self-study with collaborate learn<strong>in</strong>g. Each learner is <strong>in</strong>formed by the ideas,<br />

thoughts and approaches <strong>of</strong> each member <strong>of</strong> the virtual group. Naidu dist<strong>in</strong>guishes five<br />

pedagogical phases <strong>of</strong> this process:<br />

230

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!