07.12.2012 Views

Distance Education in Transition - Master of Distance Education ...

Distance Education in Transition - Master of Distance Education ...

Distance Education in Transition - Master of Distance Education ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Pedagogical Model for Us<strong>in</strong>g Virtual Learn<strong>in</strong>g Spaces<br />

The “electronic noticeboard” (bullet<strong>in</strong> board, news group) is a freely accessible discussion<br />

forum. All users can publish their <strong>in</strong>formation here, or question, comment on or criticise<br />

other <strong>in</strong>formation published here. Students can also request and download the discussion<br />

contributions and articles posted here and process them <strong>in</strong> the context <strong>of</strong> their learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

process. This special form <strong>of</strong> communication should not be regarded as be<strong>in</strong>g casual or<br />

even trivial. Students who have specialised <strong>in</strong> a certa<strong>in</strong> area can exchange <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

here with students <strong>of</strong> the same subjects <strong>in</strong> other universities. Specialists have already<br />

formed knowledge-build<strong>in</strong>g communities with this facility, even <strong>in</strong> research. The electronic<br />

noticeboard is becom<strong>in</strong>g a "ma<strong>in</strong> source <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional growth" (Collis, 1996, p. 67).<br />

“Computer conferences” provide a framework for longer discussions on def<strong>in</strong>ed aspects <strong>of</strong><br />

the learn<strong>in</strong>g object. Participants can ask for the floor at any time and make a contribution,<br />

comment on other contributions, or make a contribution based on their own experiences.<br />

These discussions are particularly <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g, but also difficult if members <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sem<strong>in</strong>ar group argue from the basis <strong>of</strong> different cultural contexts (cf. Bernath & Rub<strong>in</strong>,<br />

1999; Bernath, 2000).<br />

With all these forms <strong>of</strong> academic communication, and this is obvious, students rema<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>visible because <strong>of</strong> the unique nature <strong>of</strong> the virtual learn<strong>in</strong>g space. Their learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

behaviour is expressed only <strong>in</strong> the methods <strong>of</strong> their written participation. For this reason<br />

they have to be <strong>in</strong>troduced with the help <strong>of</strong> photos and biographical sketches so that all<br />

participants can see what the others look like. In this way a structure is provided for the<br />

<strong>in</strong>itially diffuse learn<strong>in</strong>g space. Two <strong>in</strong>troduction levels are created: firstly, communication<br />

takes place with people who become clearer and clearer, whether they are <strong>in</strong> Kobe,<br />

Melbourne, Manila, Dubrovnik, Oldenburg, Vancouver or Mexico City; and secondly, the<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence <strong>of</strong> the metaphor "sem<strong>in</strong>ar" leads to participants imag<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g themselves together <strong>in</strong><br />

one room, and their a-synchronous contributions are converted <strong>in</strong>to synchronous<br />

contributions, whereby, <strong>in</strong> the same way as <strong>in</strong> a face-to-face sem<strong>in</strong>ar, participants th<strong>in</strong>k<br />

they can differentiate between others who are particularly dom<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g, eager, reflective,<br />

careful, timid, self-conscious and silent.<br />

At the same time, the virtual learn<strong>in</strong>g space is structured by means <strong>of</strong> specific social<br />

arrangements. In face-to-face teach<strong>in</strong>g, the social structure <strong>of</strong> the learn<strong>in</strong>g group is<br />

traditionally relatively stable, thanks to the l<strong>in</strong>k between place and time, and to difficulties<br />

<strong>in</strong> chang<strong>in</strong>g it, but <strong>in</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Internet it can be changed easily and frequently.<br />

Consequently, several constellations are possible <strong>in</strong> the virtual learn<strong>in</strong>g space which<br />

Morten Flate Paulsen (1997, p. 121) has identified and designated as follows:<br />

� one person communicates with another person (paradigm: e-mail),<br />

� one person communicates with several others (paradigm: noticeboard),<br />

� several persons communicate with several persons (paradigm: virtual conference).<br />

The decisive question which the educationalist has to pose here is, how do learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

processes develop if communicative actions <strong>of</strong> the type shown here are available easily<br />

and at short notice, consecutively and simultaneously, and <strong>in</strong> quick succession. This<br />

gives rise to other questions. Which learn<strong>in</strong>g functions are compatible with the three<br />

social configurations and their correspond<strong>in</strong>g learn<strong>in</strong>g activities? Will teachers and<br />

students be able to handle these three forms <strong>of</strong> communication confidently? Will<br />

97

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!