07.12.2012 Views

Distance Education in Transition - Master of Distance Education ...

Distance Education in Transition - Master of Distance Education ...

Distance Education in Transition - Master of Distance Education ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

New Learn<strong>in</strong>g Spaces<br />

scenes from fairs, circuses and variety theatres. It took some time before the new<br />

technology was used for film's own dramaturgy (e.g. exterior shots, takes, mov<strong>in</strong>g<br />

cameras, close-ups, detailed shots, cutt<strong>in</strong>g, montages, animation, cartoons, blue box),<br />

and before film-makers departed from the traditional pattern <strong>of</strong> stage representations<br />

and arrived at completely new solutions. The enormous difference between a theatrical<br />

performance bound by time and place, and a film, which is bound by neither time nor<br />

place, took some time to be recognised. There will probably be a similar development <strong>in</strong><br />

the pedagogy <strong>of</strong> the digitised learn<strong>in</strong>g environment. In a similar way, this may open up<br />

new dimensions to a system <strong>of</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g liberated from the bonds <strong>of</strong> place<br />

and time. Innovative forms <strong>of</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> virtual learn<strong>in</strong>g spaces may be a result <strong>of</strong> this<br />

development.<br />

However, before this happens, we must become aware <strong>of</strong> the enormous difference<br />

between real and virtual learn<strong>in</strong>g spaces.<br />

Summary<br />

We have seen that there is a vast difference between traditional and real learn<strong>in</strong>g spaces<br />

and virtual learn<strong>in</strong>g spaces. This is important because it helps us to understand why it<br />

might be beneficial and even necessary to <strong>in</strong>novate learn<strong>in</strong>g processes drastically when<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g the net. Careful adaptations will not be enough.<br />

Another consideration can re<strong>in</strong>force this assertion. Traditional or real learn<strong>in</strong>g spaces as,<br />

for <strong>in</strong>stance, lecture halls, sem<strong>in</strong>ar rooms, classes <strong>in</strong> colleges or schools are part <strong>of</strong> our<br />

everyday experience. All <strong>of</strong> us are <strong>in</strong>tensively familiar with them as we are products <strong>of</strong><br />

what happened <strong>in</strong> these learn<strong>in</strong>g spaces. But have we ever thought about the ma<strong>in</strong> and<br />

fundamental function <strong>of</strong> these traditional technical learn<strong>in</strong>g environments? Basically,<br />

they were planned, designed and built for accomplish<strong>in</strong>g one ma<strong>in</strong> purpose: to provide for<br />

convenient locations where students and pr<strong>of</strong>essors can meet face-to-face, assemble, live<br />

and learn together. Convocatio (call<strong>in</strong>g together and assembl<strong>in</strong>g) was the fundamental<br />

organisational pr<strong>in</strong>ciple <strong>of</strong> the medieval university as well as <strong>of</strong> all campus universities<br />

today (cf. Hall, 1996a, p. 7). The reason for this was that at this time teach<strong>in</strong>g was and still<br />

is today basically an oral process. There was no other way for oral <strong>in</strong>struction than<br />

com<strong>in</strong>g together <strong>in</strong> order to speak and listen to each other. The real learn<strong>in</strong>g spaces<br />

represent the technology <strong>of</strong> traditional teach<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g. The size and proportions <strong>of</strong><br />

rooms were adapted to the requirements <strong>of</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> formats <strong>of</strong> oral teach<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

These traditional learn<strong>in</strong>g spaces have specific and important properties: learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

activities have to be fixed with regard to time and location. These spaces protect from<br />

outside disturbances, facilitate the form<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> groups, make possible experiences <strong>of</strong><br />

togetherness, feel<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> belong<strong>in</strong>g, and the common aspiration after and the common<br />

quest for knowledge. Furthermore, there is an <strong>in</strong>teraction between real learn<strong>in</strong>g spaces<br />

and the students. Students absorb their <strong>in</strong>centives, not only through their eyes but<br />

through all their senses. This <strong>in</strong>duces feel<strong>in</strong>gs, associations and attitudes. Even more,<br />

somehow they also <strong>in</strong>fluence form and contents <strong>of</strong> their <strong>in</strong>teractions.<br />

Small wonder that these real spaces created the preconditions for very specific strategies,<br />

techniques, procedures <strong>of</strong> teach<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g have been developed. We should be<br />

aware <strong>of</strong> the fact that these strategies have developed <strong>in</strong> a long historical process which<br />

reaches back to its sacred orig<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> archaic times. And we should realise that all<br />

83

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!