21.01.2016 Views

The Litvinenko Inquiry

JIEp7Zyr

JIEp7Zyr

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

6.21 – 6.24), in general terms I do not regard ‘negative’ evidence on this type of<br />

vehicle to be of any significance one way or the other.<br />

6.72 On their arrival in the terminal building that morning, Mr Lugovoy and Mr Kovtun were<br />

stopped and questioned by a policeman named Detective Constable (DC) Scott, who<br />

gave oral evidence at the <strong>Inquiry</strong>.<br />

6.73 DC Scott explained that he did not have any prior intelligence relating to either<br />

Mr Lugovoy or Mr Kovtun. He stopped them simply because he thought they might be<br />

of interest. 47 DC Scott’s file contained a photograph of the two men taken when they<br />

were stopped, timed at 11.34am. 48<br />

6.74 DC Scott examined the two men’s travel documentation and asked about the purpose<br />

of their trip to the UK. He said that Mr Kovtun did not appear to be able to speak<br />

English, but that Mr Lugovoy could and answered the questions on behalf of them<br />

both. <strong>The</strong> men said that they were travelling for business. <strong>The</strong>y gave a name that<br />

DC Scott wrote down as Mr ‘Shadray’, but which must have been a reference to<br />

Dr Shadrin. <strong>The</strong>y also gave a phone number which DC Scott called – it was the offices<br />

at 58 Grosvenor Street of Dr Shadrin’s two companies, Continental Petroleum Limited<br />

and ECO3 Capital Limited. DC Scott was told by someone there that Mr Lugovoy and<br />

Mr Kovtun were visiting ECO3 Capital.<br />

6.75 It appeared from his evidence that DC Scott was uneasy about Mr Lugovoy and<br />

Mr Kovtun. He explained that the two men:<br />

“were very evasive as to why they were coming to the UK… as I asked them<br />

questions, they weren’t coming out with the answers that I wanted to hear or<br />

expected to hear. <strong>The</strong>y were giving me very, very short answers, so there was no<br />

information in those answers.” 49<br />

6.76 Ultimately, however, once he had telephoned Dr Shadrin’s offices and completed his<br />

standard checks, DC Scott considered that he had no power to hold the two men any<br />

longer and therefore let them proceed.<br />

6.77 DC Scott estimated that the two men left him at about 11.50am. 50 It seems likely<br />

that they in fact left him a few minutes earlier, since the telephone schedule records<br />

Mr Lugovoy making calls on his mobile phone to Dr Shadrin and then to Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong><br />

at 11.45am and 11.46am respectively. 51<br />

6.78 As we shall see, later on the same day Mr Lugovoy and Mr Kovtun met Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong><br />

and together attended a meeting with Mr Reilly. It seems reasonable to assume that<br />

Mr Lugovoy’s brief call to Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> at 11.46 that morning was about that meeting,<br />

particularly since the records show that Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> called Mr Reilly a few minutes<br />

later. 52<br />

6.79 <strong>The</strong> meeting with Mr Reilly was to take place at 3.00pm. Prior to that, Mr Lugovoy<br />

and Mr Kovtun travelled into London and booked in at their hotel, the Best Western in<br />

Shaftesbury Avenue.<br />

47<br />

Scott 9/39<br />

48<br />

INQ013787 (page 4)<br />

49<br />

Scott 9/43-44<br />

50<br />

Scott 9/47<br />

51<br />

INQ017809 (page 58)<br />

52<br />

Reilly 10/83<br />

Part 6 | Chapters 1 to 8 | <strong>The</strong> polonium trail – events in October and November 2006<br />

123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!