21.01.2016 Views

The Litvinenko Inquiry

JIEp7Zyr

JIEp7Zyr

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Litvinenko</strong> <strong>Inquiry</strong><br />

Chapter 7: Russian State responsibility – the<br />

source of the polonium 210<br />

9.46 It is self evident that the isotope polonium 210 is a very rare substance. I also heard<br />

evidence that the isotope is difficult to produce and dangerous to handle. Moreover,<br />

whilst polonium 210 is routinely manufactured and sold commercially, it is only publicly<br />

available in minute quantities that are embedded within sealed containers.<br />

9.47 Since polonium 210 is such a rare and specialised commodity, the question arises as<br />

to whether evidence relating to the polonium 210 that was used to kill Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong><br />

might assist in establishing responsibility for his death. Can the source of the polonium<br />

210 be traced? If so, what inferences can be drawn?<br />

9.48 I received valuable evidence on these issues from Professor Norman Dombey.<br />

Professor Dombey was Professor of <strong>The</strong>oretical Physics at the University of Sussex<br />

from 1989 until his retirement in 2003, and since that time has been Emeritus Professor.<br />

He has extensive experience in the field of nuclear physics. He also has a level of<br />

practical knowledge, in part through his international contacts, about the production of<br />

polonium 210 in Russia. In August 2007 Professor Dombey wrote a review of Death<br />

of a Dissident in the London Review of Books. 10 Following that, he was commissioned<br />

by Alex Goldfarb to prepare an expert report for the purposes of the claim brought by<br />

Marina <strong>Litvinenko</strong> before the European Court of Human Rights. That report was dated<br />

12 November 2007. 11 Professor Dombey thereafter provided a supplementary report<br />

for the purposes of this <strong>Inquiry</strong>, 12 and also attended to give oral evidence. 13<br />

9.49 A certain amount of the evidence relating to the possible source of the polonium 210<br />

was uncontroversial.<br />

9.50 It is not in any doubt that polonium 210 is, and was, throughout the relevant period,<br />

manufactured in Russia for commercial purposes. Professor Dombey assisted me by<br />

providing detailed evidence about this industry. 14 He explained that the programme<br />

of polonium 210 production in Russia uses facilities at two former closed cities, both<br />

of which were initially established in connection with the manufacture of nuclear<br />

weapons. It was his understanding that all Russian production of polonium 210 came<br />

from this programme. 15<br />

9.51 <strong>The</strong> process by which large scale production of polonium 210 is undertaken was<br />

described in evidence by both Professor Dombey and witness A1.<br />

9.52 Put shortly, a target of bismuth 209, which is a stable isotope, is inserted into a reactor<br />

where it is bombarded with neutrons. During the bombardment, bismuth 209 atoms<br />

capture neutrons and thereby become bismuth 210 atoms. Bismuth 210 is an unstable<br />

isotope, which decays by emitting a beta particle, so that one of its neutrons changes<br />

into a proton. That converts the bismuth 210 atom into a polonium 210 atom. When<br />

the target is removed from the reactor, a process has to be undertaken to isolate<br />

10<br />

INQ006067 (pages 7-8)<br />

11<br />

INQ006067<br />

12<br />

INQ020031<br />

13<br />

Dombey 23/5-56<br />

14<br />

Dombey 23/13-39<br />

15<br />

Dombey 23/22<br />

216

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!