21.01.2016 Views

The Litvinenko Inquiry

JIEp7Zyr

JIEp7Zyr

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Litvinenko</strong> <strong>Inquiry</strong><br />

Chapter 7: Events in Hamburg 28 October –<br />

1 November<br />

6.190 Before turning to the group trip to London that commenced on 31 October, I propose<br />

briefly to consider the evidence relating to Mr Kovtun’s stay in Hamburg that<br />

immediately preceded it.<br />

6.191 As DI Mascall explained in the course of his oral testimony to the <strong>Inquiry</strong>, 173 the<br />

evidence relating to this part of the narrative consists largely of the fruits of an<br />

investigation conducted by the German authorities in the aftermath of Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>’s<br />

death. That investigation was commenced in late 2006 after the Metropolitan Police<br />

Service alerted their German colleagues to the details that they had uncovered as to<br />

Mr Kovtun’s visit to Hamburg. <strong>The</strong> German police subsequently shared the evidence<br />

that they had obtained with the British police.<br />

6.192 One piece of the evidence that emerged from the German investigation is potentially<br />

of considerable significance. It concerns a conversation that one of the German<br />

witnesses, known to us as witness D3, says that he had with Mr Kovtun on the evening<br />

of 30 October 2006. As we shall see, the German and British investigating teams<br />

reached different conclusions as to the reliability of this evidence. <strong>The</strong> German police<br />

thought that D3 was lying. <strong>The</strong> British police thought that he might well be telling the<br />

truth. As DI Mascall stated, one explanation for this difference of views lay in the fact<br />

that the German police only had access to the relatively limited evidence that they<br />

themselves had obtained, whereas the British police could place D3’s account in<br />

the context of all the other information that they had gathered in the course of their<br />

investigation. 174<br />

6.193 For the purposes of this <strong>Inquiry</strong>, the question of the weight to be placed on D3’s<br />

evidence is of course a matter for me.<br />

Outline of events<br />

6.194 <strong>The</strong> core events of this episode emerged clearly from the evidence and are, I think,<br />

uncontroversial. <strong>The</strong>y may be summarised as follows:<br />

a. On the morning of Saturday 28 October – the same morning that Mr Lugovoy<br />

was returning to Moscow from London – Mr Kovtun took an Aeroflot flight from<br />

Moscow to Hamburg 175<br />

b. Mr Kovtun was collected from Hamburg airport by his ex-wife Marina Wall, her<br />

partner Radoslaw Pietras and her children. He then returned with them to their<br />

flat and stayed there that night 176<br />

173<br />

Mascall 30/24-38<br />

174<br />

Mascall 30/29-30; 30/36-37<br />

175<br />

Mascall 24/2<br />

176<br />

Jolly 32/60 note that many of the dates given by Marina Wall during her interviews were one day out.<br />

148

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!