21.01.2016 Views

The Litvinenko Inquiry

JIEp7Zyr

JIEp7Zyr

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Part 9 | Chapters 1 to 12 | Who directed the killing?<br />

Chapter 10: Russian State responsibility –<br />

events since Alexander <strong>Litvinenko</strong>’s<br />

death<br />

9.164 It is apparent that Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> was not mourned long in Russia, at least not by<br />

the government. Leading politicians made speeches attacking Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> and<br />

even implying that he had deserved his fate (some of which I have referred to in<br />

chapter 2 of Part 4 above). It has been suggested that British and German police<br />

investigating Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>’s death received less than full cooperation from their<br />

Russian counterparts. <strong>The</strong> Russian government refused a request made by the<br />

British government to extradite Mr Lugovoy and Mr Kovtun to face criminal charges.<br />

Mr Lugovoy has been lionised in Russia. He has become a member of the Duma, and<br />

indeed was awarded an honour by President Putin during the course of the <strong>Inquiry</strong>’s<br />

hearings.<br />

9.165 <strong>The</strong> question for present purposes is whether any of these matters amount to evidence<br />

that the Russian government was actually involved in Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>’s murder.<br />

Engagement with the criminal investigations<br />

Russian aircraft not made available for testing<br />

9.166 I have referred during the course of the narrative in Part 6 above to two occasions on<br />

which British and German police investigators respectively were not able to inspect<br />

Russian passenger aircraft that were of interest to their enquiries.<br />

9.167 One of those planes was that on which Mr Lugovoy and Mr Kovtun had flown from<br />

Moscow to London on 16 October 2006 – Transaero EI-DDK (see above at paragraph<br />

6.69). <strong>The</strong> other was the Aeroflot aircraft on which Mr Kovtun flew from Moscow to<br />

Hamburg on 28 October 2006 (see paragraph 6.199 above).<br />

9.168 I do not think that it would be safe to draw any inferences about responsibility for<br />

Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>’s death from these two incidents. <strong>The</strong>re is insufficient evidence to be<br />

clear as to exactly what happened. Moreover, the two aircraft were operated by two<br />

independent companies. Even on the assumption that the aircraft were deliberately<br />

replaced on the schedules to avoid them being tested, there is no evidence on which<br />

I can safely determine whether this was done at the instigation of the airlines to avoid<br />

delay and disruption, or at the instigation of the Russian government, perhaps for<br />

more sinister reasons.<br />

Metropolitan Police Service visit to Moscow, December 2006<br />

9.169 In December 2006, officers from the Metropolitan Police team investigating<br />

Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>’s death made a formal visit to Moscow to interview witnesses. I heard<br />

evidence from two officers who went on the trip to Moscow – Mr Tarpey 70 and<br />

Mr Slater. 71<br />

70<br />

Tarpey 22/25-90<br />

71<br />

Slater 22/91-118<br />

235

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!