21.01.2016 Views

The Litvinenko Inquiry

JIEp7Zyr

JIEp7Zyr

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Part 3 | Chapters 1 to 5 | Alexander <strong>Litvinenko</strong><br />

You have shown yourself to be unworthy of your office, to be unworthy of the trust<br />

of civilised men and women.<br />

You may succeed in silencing one man but the howl of protest from around the<br />

world will reverberate, Mr Putin, in your ears for the rest of your life. May God<br />

forgive you for what you have done, not only to me but to beloved Russia and its<br />

people.”<br />

<strong>The</strong> statement was signed in manuscript by Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>, and dated<br />

21 November 2006.<br />

3.144 Doubts have been expressed as to the authenticity of this statement, or at least as<br />

to the extent to which it represented Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>’s views. I therefore took detailed<br />

evidence on this subject. <strong>The</strong> key witnesses, who all gave oral evidence, were George<br />

Menzies, who was Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>’s solicitor, 180 Mr Goldfarb, 181 Marina <strong>Litvinenko</strong> 182 and<br />

Lord Bell. 183<br />

3.145 My conclusions regarding the so called deathbed statement are as follows:<br />

a. <strong>The</strong> witnesses were agreed that the idea of the statement did not originate from<br />

Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>. Mr Menzies recalled the idea being suggested to him by a press<br />

consultant (not Lord Bell); Mr Goldfarb thought that the idea had emerged,<br />

“between me and George Menzies and Sasha”<br />

b. Mr Goldfarb emphasised that the idea had emerged “naturally” because<br />

Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> “was so adamant in trying to get across the message that the<br />

Kremlin and Putin poisoned him”. This is certainly consistent with other evidence<br />

that I have heard about Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>’s thinking at this time<br />

c. Marina <strong>Litvinenko</strong> was opposed to the idea of the statement because, as with the<br />

photograph, she still believed that Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> would survive – she said that<br />

preparing the statement was like giving up<br />

d. Mr Menzies drafted the statement. <strong>The</strong> draft was prepared in English; there was<br />

never a Russian version. Mr Menzies dictated the statement and had it typed by<br />

his secretary. He had not discussed the statement in terms with Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong><br />

at that point, but he had visited him in hospital and discussed the possible<br />

causes of his illness, and the content of the draft statement reflected Mr Menzies’<br />

understanding of Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>’s state of mind<br />

e. Mr Menzies and Mr Goldfarb initially took the statement to Lord Bell. He was<br />

against the idea of the statement because he felt it read like a deathbed statement,<br />

and he still hoped that Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> would recover<br />

f. Mr Goldfarb and Mr Menzies took the statement to UCH on 21 November. <strong>The</strong>y<br />

showed it to Marina <strong>Litvinenko</strong>, who approved it and agreed that it should be<br />

shown to Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong><br />

g. All three then went into Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong>’s room. Mr Goldfarb read the statement<br />

to him in Russian. Mr <strong>Litvinenko</strong> then asked for a pen and signed the statement<br />

180<br />

Menzies 6/6-17<br />

181<br />

Goldfarb 5/148-155<br />

182<br />

Marina <strong>Litvinenko</strong> 4/67-69<br />

183<br />

Bell 6/23-25<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!